547 results for “General Electric”, page 21 of 28
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 18, 2014 · in the opinion
Landry v. Columbia Casualty Company (2014)
…a voluntary act of Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs correctly argue that the general rule is that "other paper" does not render a case removable unless it is generated by the voluntary act of a plaintiff. Plaintiffs' argument fails…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · November 23, 2020 · in the opinion
Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Co. (2020)
…and humidity at which welding rods were stored."\[38\] This evidence is sufficient to make a colorable showing that Avondale complied with the federal government's instructions. See Savoie v. Pennsylvania General Ins., No. 15-1220…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · August 25, 2010 · in the opinion
Falgoust v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2010)
…General provision," provides "\[t\]he requirement of authentication or identification as a condition precedent to admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims." \[9…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 2, 2009 · in the opinion
In re New York City Asbestos Litigation v. AC & S., Inc. (2009)
…Dalton was a plumber, Flynn was an iron worker, McNamara was a roofer, Troiano was a plumber/general contractor and Zeitler was a sailor/painter (see Comeford Aff. in Support of Consolidation OSC at ¶¶ 7-18…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · July 30, 1999 · in the opinion
Blanding v. Director, Owcp (1999)
…was timely filed" based on § 930(f) tolling provision). Respondents cite a single Board ruling to the contrary. See Speedy v. General Dynamics Corp., 15 BRBS 352, 355 (1983). However, we owe no deference to decisions…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 9, 2019 · in the opinion
Shaffer v. AW Chesterton Co. (2019)
…and loss of consortium. The complaint also set forth federal claims under the Jones Act and unseaworthiness under general maritime law against only some of the parties. The complaint was amended three times to add and…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 5, 1995 · in the opinion
Ripa v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)
…insufficient showing of notice of the many Saranac documents which the jury was led to believe were known to Owens-Corning which still marketed Kaylo with no warnings to the end users. As a general rule…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 31, 2011 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Aurora Pump Co. (2011)
…NASH ENGINEERING COMPANY; GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. (sued individually and as successor-in- interest to GARLOCK, INC. and US GASKET CO.); GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION; THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY; GOULDS PUMPS, INC.; HARDIE-TYNES, LLC. (sued…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 29, 2022 · in the opinion
Hotard v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2022)
…the evidence suggests that they nevertheless mandated asbestos-containing materials be used in the Vessels' construction without warning the general contractor or any subcontractors about the risks of asbestos or how to safely handle the substance…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 20, 2016 · in the opinion
Blow v. OneBEACON America Insurance Company (2016)
…or in the parish in which an action could be brought against either the insured or the insurer under the general rules of venue prescribed by Code of Civil Procedure Art. 42 only when: (a) The…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · June 11, 1984 · in the opinion
Hansen v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. (1984)
…Navy during the Korean conflict and that he was classified as a pipefitter, but that his job was more properly characterized as a general handyman. Most of the pipefitting work was done on shore by others…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 3, 2004 · in the opinion
Bartel v. John Crane, Inc. (2004)
…§§ 688, et seq., the General Admiralty and Maritime law, and traditional product liability law. ECF No. 1. Lindstrom claims that he contracted this disease as a result of his work-life exposures to asbestos and asbestos…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 9, 2009 · in the opinion
Bourque v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2009)
…Kuchler, Polk, Schell, etal., New Orleans, LA, for Defendants/Appellees, General Motors, Ford Motor Company. Court composed of JIMMIE C. PETERS, MARC T. AMY and MICHAEL G. SULLIVAN, Judges. AMY, Judge. Former employee and wife brought…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 25, 2018 · in the opinion
Rivera v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2018)
…and a retired Assistant Surgeon General of the United States to show Avondale knew no more than the government did about the dangers of asbestos at the time Avondale used asbestos-containing materials in its shipbuilding…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 31, 2014 · in the opinion
Williams v. Georgia-Pacific (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. VI), 2014)
…App. at 160. Baxley submitted as evidence testimony from Oliver E. Burch, former General Sales Manager for Georgia-Pacific's Gypsum Division, which was apparently given in a deposition for a separate lawsuit. Burch stated that…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 5, 1999 · in the opinion
Pittsburgh Corning Corp. v. Walters (1999)
…be raised at any point in the proceeding. A preliminary motion is, therefore, necessary to assure the application of the laws of another jurisdiction. General Chem. Corp. v. De La Lastra, 852 S.W.2d 916…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 25, 2023 · in the opinion
Lewis v. Washington State Department OF Labor and Industries (2023)
…1516, Counsel for Appellant(s). Robert W. Ferguson, Office of the Attorney General, 1125 Washington St Se, Po Box 40100, Olympia, WA, 98504-0100, Steve Vinyard, Attorney General's Office, Po Box 40121, Olympia, WA, 98504…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 5, 2000 · in the opinion
Brunet v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2000)
…should be held strictly liable for the injuries that Brunet sustained. The trial court did not err in awarding Brunet $250,000 in general damages. I do not believe that the award is beyond that which…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion
Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer (2013)
…more widely used terminology in Virginia as well as the terminology used by the circuit court in this case. \[3\] Although the General Assembly later established a discovery rule for asbestos-related diseases based on diagnosis…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 4, 2019 · in the opinion
Thomas-Fish v. Aetna Steel Products Corp. (2019)
…¶ 20) It is undisputed for purposes of the instant motion that Sonic Industries is not subject to general jurisdiction in the State of New Jersey. Sonic Industries is incorporated in California and maintains its principal place…