No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

434 results for “General Electric”, page 21 of 22

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · July 21, 2010 · in the opinion

    Summers v. Certainteed Corp. (2010)

    …breath. In so finding, Dr. Gelfand noted that, while the obstructive lung condition due to smoking showed "some improvement," in general, the reduction in lung diffusion remained severe. See Report of Dr. Gelfand concerning Frederick Summers…

  2. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 29, 2002 · in the opinion

    Gatling v. Eaton Corp. (2002)

    …exertional intolerance, weakness, fatigue, and general malaise, as well was mental anguish. After trial, the jury returned a verdict against Appellants finding that Gatling did not have the claimed asbestos-related injury and did not have…

  3. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · February 13, 1986 · in the opinion

    Zupan v. Industrial Com. (1986)

    …term \Occupational Disease' means a disease arising out of and in the course of employment. Ordinary diseases of life to which the general public is exposed outside of the employment shall not be compensable \ \ \." (Ill. Rev…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 11, 1998 · in the opinion

    McCauley v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    …wages. \[4\] In Simmons, the supreme court noted a limited exception to the general rule that a plaintiff does not have a viable cause of action for asymptomatic pleural thickening. This exception recognizes that a plaintiff…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · September 11, 2017 · in the opinion

    MacCormack v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2017)

    …911 (Mass. App. Ct. 1987) (reasoning that a worsening of a condition did not justify a subsequent new action as "\[t\]he general rule is, of course, that a plaintiff the "identity of issues" factor. 8…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 13, 2004 · in the opinion

    Smalls v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. (2004)

    …Trial, 12/4/01, at 32. Appellant argues that the opinion was inadmissible because it had no basis in fact nor general acceptance in the scientific community. We disagree. ¶ 11 Again, we observe that the admission…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · October 5, 1981 · in the opinion

    White v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1981)

    …admiralty jurisdiction and rejected claims under the Extension of Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C. § 740, or the general maritime law, 28 U.S.C. § 1333, because the alleged injuries bore no reasonable relationship to traditional…

  8. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 9, 2001 · in the opinion

    Emery v. Owens-Corporation (2001)

    …suitable references to plaintiff's closing argument), we issue a precautionary warning that the general reference to "witnesses" in its admissibility assertion skirts the outer perimeter of Rule 2-12.4. \[9\] See La. Acts 1979…

  9. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 22, 1998 · in the opinion

    Rareshide v. Mobil Oil Corp. (1998)

    …attack. Dr. Gary Menszer, a board-certified cardiologist, admitted the claimant to East Jefferson General Hospital in August, 1995, following his heart attack. After performing a balloon angioplasty of the circumflex for this heart attack, Dr…

  10. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 3, 1982 · in the opinion

    Staiano v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1982)

    …Pa.R.App.P. 301(a). Appellants acknowledge the general rule that an issue not argued below may not be argued on appeal, but nevertheless assert that their argument is not waived. They say: [\293] The…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 16, 2007 · in the opinion

    Aguirre v. Long IS. Rail RD. Co. (2007)

    …motion, the LIRR primarily argues that the plaintiffs failed at trial to proffer legally sufficient evidence to support their claims of general and specific causation with respect to their alleged exposure to asbestos and unidentified dusts…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 30, 1994 · in the opinion

    Williamson v. Plant Insulation Co. (1994)

    …The proceedings here had not reached that stage when Wash Williamson died. (4) "The general rule is that \courts have inherent power to enter judgments nunc pro tunc so as to relate back to the time…

  13. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 15, 2009 · in the opinion

    Daley v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)

    …Note: Rule 1035.2 sets forth the general principle that a motion for summary judgment is based on an evidentiary record which entitles the moving party to judgment as a matter of law. The evidentiary record…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Nebraska · October 22, 2020 · in the opinion

    Butler v. Union Pacific R. Co. (2020)

    …cancer which does not presently exist but which may develop in the future. This release includes any future damages, general or specific, that BUTLER may incur in an attempt to alleviate or cure any illness, disease…

  15. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · December 7, 1983 · in the opinion

    Clay v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1983)

    …other issues remaining in relation to defendant Raybestos-Manhattan, the first issue pertains to the judge's instruction to the jury on the possible effect of a general 10-year statute of limitations, T.C.A…

  16. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 24, 1987 · in the opinion

    VaSalle v. Celotex Corp. (1987)

    …Defendants assert that plaintiff's causes of action accrued in 1972 when VaSalle discovered that he was suffering from asbestosis. • 1, 2 As a general rule, when a plaintiff suffers an obvious injury from a single…

  17. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · September 16, 1983 · in the opinion

    Thompson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1983)

    …Thompson can advance in support of his claim that Louisiana would adopt either if presented his case is a supposed general tendency or trend on the part of Louisiana courts to expand the liability of manufacturers…

  18. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · November 23, 1994 · in the opinion

    Adcock v. Brakegate, Ltd. (1994)

    …the theory of civil conspiracy. (Restatement (Second) of Torts § 876, Comment c on Clause (a) (1977).) A defendant who understands the general objectives of the conspiratorial scheme, accepts them, and agrees, either explicitly or implicitly to…

  19. Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · March 6, 2007 · in the opinion

    Jaqua v. Canadian Nat. RR, Inc. (2007)

    …575 (1942). In Callen, the plaintiff sued for injuries he sustained in a railroad accident after he signed a general release agreement that, in exchange for a cash payment, waived any claim for injuries he sustained…

  20. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 9, 1991 · in the opinion

    Thacker v. Unr Industries, Inc. (1991)

    …In a comprehensive opinion, this court discussed and applied a combination of the general substantial-factor test of causation and the "frequency, regularity and proximity test" and the "fiber-drift" theory which involved causation of asbestos…