No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

442 results for “General Electric”, page 21 of 23

  1. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · January 22, 2015 · in the opinion

    In re EI DU Pont DE Nemours and Company (2015)

    …a preponderance of the evidence or even affirmative evidence, because to require such would incorrectly shift the burden of proof. Clophus v. General Motors Corp., 769 S.W.2d 669, 670 (Tex. App.-Houston \[14th Dist.…

  2. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 22, 2016 · in the opinion

    Arpin v. Consol. Rail Corp. (2016)

    …626, 68 S.Ct. 296. Prior to the action, Callen had executed a general release relieving the railroad company from liability for personal injuries sustained in the occurrence. Id. at 626-627, 68 S.Ct. 296…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 16, 2017 · in the opinion

    Cunningham v. Aerco Intl. (2017)

    …generally that the law of different jurisdictions may apply, absent any analysis with respect to this issue, such general statement is an insufficient basis to deny consolidation. However, this determination does not preclude the parties from…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · October 28, 1981 · in the opinion

    Fearson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1981)

    …The defendants' first argument is that plaintiff's "survival" claim is time-barred under the law of the District of Columbia, which provides that the general period of limitations is three years. See D.C.Code …

  5. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 30, 1999 · in the opinion

    Porter Hayden Company v. Wyche (1999)

    …to the earliest diagnosis, from adenocarcinoma is 13.2 years." Although Porter Hayden seems to take issue in its reply brief with the use of general epidemiological testimony to draw inferences in specific cases, in Grimshaw…

  6. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · July 1, 2015 · in the opinion

    Payne v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2015)

    …a diesel locomotive, inside the cab or just in the general area." He acknowledged that "diesel fumes would go \[\] into the air in the general direction back toward the caboose, the cab of the engine and…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · April 27, 2022 · in the opinion

    Israel v. John Crane, Inc. (2022)

    …932 F.2d 413, 415 (5th Cir. 1991) (holding that a cause of action under general maritime law "accrues when a plaintiff has had a reasonable opportunity to discover his injury, its cause, and the link…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 2, 2013 · in the opinion

    Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Carter (2013)

    …the non manufacturer supplier to warn plaintiffs is different under some circumstances than the duty of a manufacturer. In general, the supplier-installer is not held to a standard as strict as imposed on the manufacturer.

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Co. (2022)

    …judgment is disfavored when issues of intent or state of mind are involved, plaintiffs fail to consider that this is a general rule. The rule does not preclude this Court from evaluating the merits of such…

  10. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · November 22, 2004 · in the opinion

    Gibson v. Workers'compensation Appeal Board (2004)

    …We note that, in general, questions concerning the admission and exclusion of evidence are within the sound discretion of the tribunal and are not to be reversed on appeal absent a finding of an abuse of…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Aquitato v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…

  12. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 10, 2018 · in the opinion

    Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2018)

    …affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. General Casualty Insurance Co. v. Lacey, 199…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 2, 2022 · in the opinion

    Adams v. Eagle, Inc. (2022)

    …in which, for example, one circuit held "\[w\]hen only minimal or very general requirements are set for the contractor by the United States the \[government contractor defense\] is inapplicable." \[127\] Accordingly, under Boyle, in this…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion

    Krik v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2017)

    …our holding in this case, we note that in general investigating a sitting juror is fraught with danger — such an investigation could be seen by the juror as intimidation or harassment. Such an investigation might lead…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 29, 2013 · in the opinion

    Jensen v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (2013)

    …Inc., 236 F.3d 1061, 1067 (9th Cir. 2001)(citing McCabe v. General Foods Corp., 811 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir. 1987)). The non-diverse defendant has been fraudulently joined if the plaintiff fails to…

  16. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 24, 2015 · in the opinion

    Best v. The William Powell Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)

    …engine, pumps, valves, steam traps, and turbines, and general cleanup. After he left the Navy, Best performed brake jobs on vehicles using asbestos-containing brakes. (NYSCEF 95). Defendants remaining in his action are Carrier Corporation, Goulds…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2002 · in the opinion

    McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc. (2002)

    …summary judgment was reversed on appeal. In Scheiding, a general contractor defendant supported its summary judgment motion with a declaration from counsel stating that the plaintiff did not mention the defendant in discovery. (Id. at p…

  18. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · May 10, 2017 · in the opinion

    Harris v. Deere & Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …them on machinery or sold them through the Deere network of independent dealers as Genuine John Deere parts." Plaintiff also submitted a document titled "Instruction and Parts List for John Deere General Purpose Tractor" from 1940…

  19. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 7, 2021 · in the opinion

    Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2021)

    …marks omitted.) Id. In contrast, a defendant who understands the general objectives of a conspiratorial scheme and agrees to do its part to further those objectives is liable as a conspirator. Id. ¶ 13 Because a conspiracy…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 22, 2017 · in the opinion

    Appleton v. Allied Signal (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…