434 results for “General Electric”, page 22 of 22
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · March 30, 1992 · in the opinion
Borman v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1992)
…persons with a significant smoking history\] as compared with the non-smokers and ... the non-asbestos exposed folks in the general population? A Up to 12 — up to 12 to 15 times the group you compared…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · March 18, 1987 · in the opinion
Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. US (1987)
…a trail longer and broader than Judge Gignoux's. To understand the First Circuit's approach to the matter, it will be useful to refer briefly to the general structure of LHWCA. Complementing the Jones Act…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · September 21, 2017 · in the opinion
Filipek v. the Boeing Company (2017)
…NO. 23: Admit that Plaintiff Marlin Filipek was diagnosed with an asbestos- related disease prior to May 19, 2010. ANSWER: Plaintiffs incorporate by reference General Objections 1-8. Subject to and without waiving these objections, admit…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 26, 2020 · in the opinion
Weddle v. BP Amoco Chemical Company (2020)
…Accordingly, Claimant's position in the hearing before the IAB was affirmed on appeal. To determine what fee is reasonable, the Court considers the factors outlined by the Delaware Supreme Court in General Motors Corp. v…
-
Court case · Montana Workers' Comp. Court · July 1, 2009 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation (2009)
…a dryer tender and 6695 hours as a dryer stacker.\[19\] The dryer tender was responsible for the general day-to-day operation of the dryers.\[20\] The dryer stacker was responsible for operating the grading…
-
Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · September 8, 2011 · in the opinion
Kelley v. Union Carbide Corporation (2011)
…occupational injury claims. We disagree. "The meaning of the statute is determined by viewing the statute as a whole and in light of its general purpose." City of Lenoir City v. State ex rel. City of…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Common Pleas · January 12, 1987 · in the opinion
Lavelle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1987)
…developing cancer in the future. Ohio courts have not specifically addressed the issue presented here but the general policy of this state has been to permit recovery for reasonable apprehension of a potential harm flowing from…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 8, 1982 · in the opinion
White v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1982)
…However, an occupational disease is not an "injury" that is susceptible of such precise determination since occupational diseases in general are progressive diseases that develop over a long period of time. The symptoms of an occupational…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · January 30, 2018 · in the opinion
MacCormack v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2018)
…App. Ct. 1987) (reasoning that a worsening of a condition did not justify a subsequent new action as "\[t\]he general rule is, of course, that a plaintiff is entitled to one recovery in a personal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio · July 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Ridenour v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (2014)
…they waive any defense or bar to bringing such a suit. The State of Ohio, the Ohio Attorney General, the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, and all defendants in this action agree that the statute…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · November 28, 1978 · in the opinion
Daniels v. Combustion Engineering, Inc. (1978)
… and fifth, the legal existence of the first suit. "The general rules above laid down have been held applicable, notwithstanding the fact that one suit is at law and the other in equity. Because a deposition…
-
Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · September 21, 1992 · in the opinion
Thacker v. Unr Industries, Inc. (1992)
…44 Ill.2d at 405, 256 N.E.2d 6. As is the general rule in civil cases, the plaintiff has the burden of producing evidence sufficient to establish each element of his or her claim.
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 30, 2015 · in the opinion
Smith v. Illinois Central R. Co. (2015)
…silica. ¶ 12 Over defendant's objection, the trial court also allowed plaintiff to introduce a 1937 circular from the General Managers Association of Chicago, which purportedly went to all railroads operating in Illinois. The circular included…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · March 6, 1984 · in the opinion
Copeland v. Celotex Corp. (1984)
…This defect is the cause of the alleged injury, and in a very general sense its existence must constitute under the respective theories of recovery a breach of a duty, a breach of a warranty and…