542 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 22 of 28
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 26, 2022 · in the opinion
Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Co. (2022)
…1986); see also Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 2004-1589 (La. App. 1 Cir. 9/23/05), 923 So. 2d 118, writ denied sub nom. Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 2005-2318 (La. 3…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 20, 2007 · in the opinion
Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2007)
…negligence theory) unless the manufacturer had actual or constructive knowledge of the potential hazard. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1002-1003.) Unocal contends the notion of what constitutes a "hazard…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · May 27, 2014 · in the opinion
In re Placid Oil Co. (2014)
…Post at 159-60. We note, however, that Wright v. Owens Corning, 679 F.3d 101 (3d Cir.2012), raises doubts as to whether the Williamses actually had dischargeable claims. In that case, the Third Circuit…
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · February 13, 2019 · in the opinion
Keene v. Cna Holdings, LLC (2019)
…698 S.E.2d 835, 838 (Ct. App. 2010) ("Unfair prejudice means an undue tendency to suggest a decision on an improper basis." (quoting State v. Owens, 346 S.C. 637, 666, 552 S.E.2d…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 18, 2020 · in the opinion
Whitehead v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)
…plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 23, 2010 · in the opinion
Cowley v. Acands, Inc. (2010)
…consider it. \[5\] In oral argument, Plaintiff asserted that Pittsburgh Corning and Owens-Corning had the same motives as MCIC since these companies had a distributorship agreement with MCIC. (Transcript of Oral Argument at 7-8…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 24, 2023 · in the opinion
Hutchins v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2023)
…When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · October 26, 2020 · in the opinion
Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2020)
…179, 644 S.E.2d 724 (2007) (adopting the Lohrmann test for actionable exposure in South Carolina); Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th Cir. 1995) (applying the Lohrmann test in…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · January 23, 2002 · in the opinion
Hoerner v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2002)
…the following non-party defendants, each of whom settled with the Hoerners prior to trial, but were nevertheless found liable by the jury for Mr. Hoerner's asbestosis: Owens-Corning Corp., Pittsburg-Corning Corp., Flintkote, Uniroyal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · March 9, 2023 · in the opinion
Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)
…with maritime law, is that the plaintiff show "more than a casual or minimum contact with the product" to hold the defendant liable. Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prod., 69 F.3d 712, 716 …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · December 7, 2017 · in the opinion
Queen v. CBS Corporation (2017)
…at 1162-63. This is consistent with the requirements of North Carolina law. See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 n.2 (4th Cir. 1995) (finding Lohrmann consistent with North Carolina…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 20, 2019 · in the opinion
Matter of Fischer v. American Biltrite, Inc. (2019)
…benches which were very desirable, and they came with it. They were — it turns out that they were corrugated much like the shaping of Owens-Corning's fiberglass, but it was thicker, and they were used…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · March 23, 1984 · in the opinion
Adams v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)
…is AFFIRMED. \[1\] Evidence introduced at trial indicated that Adams was smoking as many as 15 cigars a day before he quit in 1974. \[2\] The settling defendants were: Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.; Armstrong Cork Co.…
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · September 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Burkhart v. HJ Heinz Co. (2014)
…insulation sent to the facility in Bowling Green, interrogatories filed in unrelated litigation in which Owens Corning Fiberglass Corporation admitted that this type of pipe insulation [\432] contained asbestos, an environmental report indicating that asbestos was…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · November 10, 2016 · in the opinion
French v. AW Chesterton Company (2016)
…conduct performed under color of federal office; and (4) defendant raises a colorable federal defense to plaintiff's claim. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3rd Cir. 1998) (citing Mesa v…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · October 18, 2001 · in the opinion
Jurich v. Garlock, Inc. (2001)
…whom an injured plaintiff otherwise could have sought recovery, his or her tort remedy is far from complete. This fact is highlighted by our supreme court's recent decision in Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. Cobb…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 24, 2009 · in the opinion
Cashman v. Pacific Scientific Company (2009)
…is no reasonable inference that he removed and replaced the original asbestos insulation. The estate also points to certain documents obtained during discovery from the Selas Corporation.\[16\] One document refers to Owens-Corning Kaylo 20…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)
…plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 15, 2017 · in the opinion
Saller v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. (2017)
…inter alia, upon a theory of design defect. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995.) Defective design may be established under two theories: (1) the consumer expectations test, which asks "whether…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 17, 2009 · in the opinion
Kirks v. General Electric Company (2009)
…a colorable federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d…