No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

547 results for “General Electric”, page 23 of 28

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 22, 2024 · in the opinion

    Gomez v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2024)

    …and failure to enact safety measures while this case, in addition to those claims, also involves claims for general negligence and strict liability. While Avondale is correct, Gomez's motion only seeks summary judgment as to…

  2. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 15, 2023 · in the opinion

    Del Vescovo v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)

    …Judge Rosemary Ledet, Judge Dale N. Atkins, Judge Nakisha Ervin-Knott. DALE N. ATKINS, Judge. This is a Jones Act and general maritime case. Appellants, Maria Assunta del\[1\] Vescovo, Giulia Nasini, Giuliano Nasini, and Maria…

  3. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · March 19, 1991 · in the opinion

    Threadgill v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1991)

    …carbon copy of an October 1, 1935 letter from Bridgeport, Connecticut (Raybestos headquarters), to Vandiver Brown, general counsel for Johns-Manville, indicates that the Rossiter letter was enclosed. The copy, while unsigned, contains the word "President…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · December 9, 1986 · in the opinion

    In re Hawaii Federal Asbestos Cases (1986)

    …Moreover the Hawaii Court of Appeals has held that the introduction of concepts of "unreasonableness" and "foreseeability" into products liability confuses the jury and equates strict liability with negligence. Boudreau v. General Elec. Co., 2 Haw…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · April 27, 2020 · in the opinion

    Mullinex v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)

    …§ 1333(1) and 46 U.S.C. § 30101 and the general admiralty and maritime law of the United States." ECF No. 1-4 ¶ 7. JCI does not seek to dismiss any particular claim in the Amended…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · May 7, 1992 · in the opinion

    Sealover v. Carey Canada (1992)

    …112 S.Ct. 1671, 118 L.Ed.2d 391 (New Rule 238 withstands constitutional challenges on due process and equal protection grounds.); Leonard v. General Motors Corp., Civil No. 88-2380, slip op. at 5 (E…

  7. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 16, 2011 · in the opinion

    Rome v. Asbestos Defendants (2011)

    …1961, Kahr Bearing Corporation acquired the Arnot Marine Division of Aetna Steel Products Corporation. Kahr Bearing Corporation was sold to General Acceptance Corporation in 1967. In 1969, General Acceptance Corporation sold Kahr Bearing Corporation to Sargent…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 26, 2018 · in the opinion

    Botta v. AERCO Int'l (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …1st Dept. 1984\]). Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D. 81, 38…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 1, 2019 · in the opinion

    Thomas-Fish v. Avborne Accessory Group, Inc. (2019)

    …11, 2009)). "\[T\]he warranty of merchantability simply means that the thing sold is reasonably fit for the general purpose for which it is manufactured and sold." Id. (internal quotations and emphasis omitted) (quoting Ferrari v…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 8, 2015 · in the opinion

    Vedros v. Northrop Grumman (2015)

    …who suffered the physical injury. See LA. CIV. CODE art. 2315.6. \[2\] For the same reasons announced in Comardelle v. Pennsylvania General Ins. Co., No. 13-6555, 2014 WL 5762841, at [\3] (E.D. La…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · November 30, 2020 · in the opinion

    Phelps v. CBS Corporation (2020)

    …Plaintiff may offer evidence to establish facts upon which Mr. Paskal relies, including video testimony from Grimes and general testimony from the Plaintiff's Naval Expert, Mr. Paskal's opinions cannot be excluded at this stage…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · May 1, 1981 · in the opinion

    Fusco v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. (1981)

    …1975) is not in point. In Kellum, the court determined that the United States in general was not subject to state statutes of limitations; however, nothing in the opinion indicates that a state statute of limitations…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Blouin v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2017)

    …¶ 11. Plaintiffs do not take issue with the foregoing general allegations. But given that their claims pertain to Avondale's failure to warn of the hazards of asbestos and failure to implement any of the known…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 21, 2021 · in the opinion

    Sanchez v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2021)

    …So.2d 695, 707 (La. App. 3 Cir. 1997) ("Loss of consortium is more than just a loss of general overall happiness, it also includes love and affection, society and companionship, sexual relations, the right of…

  15. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · October 15, 1987 · in the opinion

    Lockwood v. AC & S, Inc. (1987)

    …jury. The evidence before the jury included expert testimony on asbestos and the disease of asbestosis, the dangerousness of asbestos to individuals in general and to shipyard workers, and the effects of combining smoking with asbestosis…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 27, 2016 · in the opinion

    Dandridge v. Crane Co. (2016)

    …injuries, and consequently, less justification for a departure from the general rule under maritime law that "a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 10, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)

    …and simply restate the general rule that the corporate form may be disregarded in some instances.\[43\] As plaintiffs have not produced evidence supporting even a single factor that Louisiana courts look to when analyzing whether…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 5, 2009 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Bondex Int'l (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2009)

    …address the standards pertaining to relation back, and then proceed to apply those standards to the case before us. Relation Back in General Relation back is governed by Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c) which provides…

  19. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 16, 2017 · in the opinion

    Cunningham v. Aerco Intl. (2017)

    …generally that the law of different jurisdictions may apply, absent any analysis with respect to this issue, such general statement is an insufficient basis to deny consolidation. However, this determination does not preclude the parties from…

  20. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · November 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    Gibbs v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Drydock Company (2012)

    …hazard of life itself. It is difficult to imagine that the General Assembly intended to include it within the term "contract of hire," however broadly defined. For the purposes of this appeal, it is not necessary…