No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

767 results for “General Electric”, page 23 of 39

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · January 18, 2000

    Barnes v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2000)

    …plant; Barton Brands Distillery; Anaconda Aluminum, Louisville; Brown & Williamson general laborer and maintenance machinist Anaconda Aluminum Louisville 1963-1973; maintenance worker Brown & Williamson 1973-1982; worker in the whiskey filtration department Barton Brands Distillery 1959-1990

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 4, 2009

    Hogston v. Allis-Chalmers Corp. (2009)

    …s asbestos product, but it must show probability rather than possibility. A distributor's general franchise territory, without evidence of deliveries to the plant and with direct evidence that another distributor supplied it, does not let…

  3. Court case · Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals · March 28, 2007

    Zinc Corp. OF America v. Reeder (2007)

    …s workers' compensation statute applies only to silicosis and asbestosis, not mesothelioma, so the general last-injurious-exposure rule applies, under which the last employer is liable without a minimum quantity of exposure. Causation; Expert Testimony…

  4. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · October 18, 2001

    Jurich v. Garlock, Inc. (2001)

    …not sellers of asbestos-containing products. The general ten-year repose period violates the open courts clause of Article I, Section 12 as applied to a latent asbestos disease where exposure began before the Act or…

  5. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · April 10, 2013

    Greer v. Ace Hardware Corporation (2013)

    …summary judgment, the plaintiff must produce evidence identifying a specific asbestos-containing product the defendant made or supplied and to which the plaintiff was exposed; general assertions that "some" products contained asbestos, or guesswork, are not…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 7, 2024

    Perkins v. United States (2024)

    …Navy asbestos directives were mandatory and followed preclude dismissal. Under Washington law, duty turns on foreseeability of a general field of danger, and disputed expert evidence on substantial-factor causation precludes summary judgment. Causation; Expert Testimony…

  7. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 1, 2021

    Lege v. Union Carbide Corporation (2021)

    …affirmed the judgment for the Leges, including the 51% fault allocation to Birla. A jury's allocation of fault and general damages is reviewed for manifest error or abuse of discretion, and exposure need not be…

  8. Court case · Missouri Supreme Court · September 10, 1991

    Hagen v. Celotex Corp. (1991)

    …A plaintiff must show through expert testimony that each defendant's product was a substantial factor in causing the harm. Evidence showing only asbestos exposure in general, or that a defendant's product may have contributed…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 11, 2007 · in the opinion

    Cadlo v. Metalclad Insulation Corporation (2007)

    …Cadlo's\] contraction of cancer, \[Maxlyn Cadlo\] would have continued her marital relationship with him for another 20 years." (See Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp. (1991) 230 Cal.App.3d 1125, 1152 \[briefs are reliable indications…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 6, 2020 · in the opinion

    Lopez v. McDERMOTT, Inc (2020)

    …inherent in the job. R. Doc. 449-2 at 19. In general, a premises owner has a duty to protect persons on the premises from the unreasonable risk of harm. Mundy v. Dep't of Health…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · October 19, 2014 · in the opinion

    Oneal v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2014)

    …Court must consider whether Oneal's claims are governed by federal admiralty law or by state law. In general, admiralty law applies to a tort action when the alleged tort occurred on navigable waters and the…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · March 22, 2001 · in the opinion

    Crawford v. Artuz (2001)

    …Naponoch, NY, Plaintiff Pro se. Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General of the State of New York by Michael J. Keane, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, New York City, for Defendants. OPINION CHIN, District Judge. Pro se plaintiffs Clifton…

  13. Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · February 29, 2012 · in the opinion

    Kurns v. Railroad Friction Products Corp. (2012)

    …Ante, at 1268. That is insufficient. Not every state law that "could be said to affect tangentially" matters within the regulated field is pre-empted. English v. General Elec. Co., 496 U.S. 72, 85, 110…

  14. Court case · Nebraska Supreme Court · June 26, 1981 · in the opinion

    Osteen v. AC & S., Inc. (1981)

    …which we are now accepting as the law of this State, be deemed unjust, the remedy lies with the General Assembly." Id. at 487. A reminder of the root purpose of workmen's compensation legislation appears…

  15. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · April 16, 2009 · in the opinion

    Nolan v. Weil-McLain (2009)

    …determining whether a plaintiff has satisfied the burden of proof at trial. We began by reciting the "general rule in civil cases" that a plaintiff bears the burden of producing evidence sufficient to establish each element…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · August 25, 2014 · in the opinion

    Bobo v. Tennessee Valley Authority (2014)

    …Mrs. Bobo's contraction of pleural mesothelioma from laundering her husband's work clothes, purportedly containing asbestos dust originating from his job duties at TVA's Browns Ferry Nuclear power general facility in Limestone County, Alabama…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Idaho · October 1, 2018 · in the opinion

    Stephens v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (2018)

    …to recover under this claim. Indeed, so much is indicated by the captions in Stephens' Complaint, describing their overarching general allegation: "Plaintiff Sustained Toxic Exposure to Asbestos From Union Pacific Locomotives." Compl. at p. 3, Dkt…

  18. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 28, 2017 · in the opinion

    American Home Assur. Co. v. Port Auth. of NY & NJ (2017)

    …American Home Assurance Company (American Home) seeks declaratory relief to determine its rights and obligations under a general liability insurance policy issued to defendant The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (the Port Authority…

  19. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · October 22, 2010 · in the opinion

    Robinson v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. (2010)

    …Constitution, which states: To guard against transgressions of the high powers herein delegated, we declare that everything in this "Bill of Rights" is excepted out of the general powers of government, and shall forever remain inviolate…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 1, 2010 · in the opinion

    Peter & Elpis Constantinides v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2010)

    …125-8). Defendant asserts that this is a general, speculative statement and is insufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact. While it is true that Plaintiffs' expert does not directly controvert Defendant's expert…