No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

736 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 24 of 37

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2019 · in the opinion

    Rickert v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2019)

    …as set forth in Ford Motor Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America (1995) 35 Cal.App.4th 604 (Ford.) But as NFL explained, Ford's "seriously inconvenient" standard applies — if at all — only when the…

  2. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · June 23, 2020 · in the opinion

    Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson (2020)

    …App. W.D. 2000). The second is where an agency relationship is established between a parent corporation and its subsidiary. See State ex rel. Ford Motor Co. v. Bacon, 63 S.W.3d 641, 642 (Mo…

  3. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · March 23, 1998 · in the opinion

    McClain v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    …International Armament Corp., 17 F.3d 992, 995 (7th Cir.1994); Barron v. Ford Motor Co. of Can., 965 F.2d 195, 198-99 (7th Cir.1992). Owens-Corning bears "an onerous burden \because a reviewing…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 29, 2020 · in the opinion

    Estes v. Eaton Corporation (2020)

    …authority cited by Estes, where the trial court specifically mentioned and rejected plaintiff's expert testimony as "\completely lacking in probative force.' "(See Meiner v. Ford Motor Co. (1971) 17 Cal.App.3d 127, 134-135.…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 3, 1998 · in the opinion

    Scheiding v. General Motors Corp. (1998)

    …59 Cal.2d 57, 27 Cal.Rptr. 697, 377 P.2d 897, and Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256, 37 Cal.Rptr. 896, 391 P.2d 168.) Viad reasons, "Because we find…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 30, 2014 · in the opinion

    Barabin v. AstenJOHNSON, Inc. (2014)

    …must "seek the rule \[it\] believe\[s\] that Court would adhere to were it confronted with a similar situation." Commercial Union Ins. Co. v. Ford Motor Co., 640 F.2d 210, 212 (9th Cir. 1981) Yet…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · November 23, 2021 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Orton (2021)

    …underpinnings" and "correctness of the expert's conclusions" may affect any ultimate determination on the merits, but do not govern admissibility. See Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713, 718-19 (7th Cir. 2000)…

  8. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)

    …actual, product-specific causation in many asbestos cases, the courts have come to accept abstract assessments of increased risk as proxies for traditional substantial-factor causation. See Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 637 Pa. 625, 668…

  9. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · July 26, 1993 · in the opinion

    Coffman v. Keene Corp. (1993)

    …Industries, Inc. v. Balbos, 326 Md. 179, 604 A.2d 445, 468-69 (1992); Wolfe v. Ford Motor Co., 6 Mass. App. Ct. 346, 376 N.E.2d 143, 147 (1978); Grady v. American Optical Corp.…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 4, 2018 · in the opinion

    Barabin v. Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. (2018)

    …weight of the evidence, based upon false or perjurious evidence, or tainted by passion or prejudice. See Bear ex rel. Bloom v. Ford Motor Co., No. C05-0253EFS, 2008 WL 2230743, at [\8] (E.D. Wash…

  11. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · October 31, 1989 · in the opinion

    Falk v. Keene Corp. (1989)

    …is subject to liability for physical harm thereby caused to the ultimate user ..." This court adopted the strict liability theory of section 402A as to manufacturers in Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wn.2d 522…

  12. Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · April 5, 2023 · in the opinion

    Glenn v. 3M Co. (2023)

    …been anticipated by the manufacturer or seller...." Small, 329 S.C. at 466, 494 S.E.2d at 844. Fisher cites Branham v. Ford Motor Co., 390 S.C. 203, 210, 701 S.E.2d 5…

  13. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 19, 2018 · in the opinion

    Shulman v. Brenntag N. AM., Inc. (2018)

    …of fact exist as to whether JJBP used by Ms. Shulman was contaminated with asbestos and defective, or unsuited for its purpose (See Denny v. Ford Motor Co., 87 N.Y. 2d 248, 662 N.E…

  14. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · December 28, 2009 · in the opinion

    Honeywell International, Inc. v. Guilder (2009)

    …redact this portion of the letter for use at trial. See MCI Exp., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 832 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Next, we turn to the second issue concerning the exclusion…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2016 · in the opinion

    Moran v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation (2016)

    …and certain court of appeal decisions rendered in its wake: Chavez, supra, 207 Cal.App.4th 1283, Scott v. Ford Motor Co. (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 1492 (Scott), Collin, supra, 228 Cal.App.4th 582…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 18, 2009 · in the opinion

    O'neil v. Crane Co. (2009)

    …or raw material and therefore are in a better position to guarantee that the component or raw material is suitable for their particular applications." \[Citations.\]' (Springmeyer v. Ford Motor Co. \[(1998)\] 60 Cal.App.4th 1541…

  17. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 13, 2018 · in the opinion

    Garrido v. Johnson & Johnson (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …of fact exist as to whether JJBP used by Mrs. Garrido was contaminated with asbestos and defective, or unsuited for its purpose (See Denny v. Ford Motor Co., 87 N.Y. 2d 248, 662 N.E…

  18. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · February 20, 1990 · in the opinion

    Grispo v. Eagle-Picher Indus. (In re Joint E. & S. Dist. New York Asbestos Lit., 1990)

    …worth undertaking at this time, we proceed to consider it. As the military contractor defense exists to promote a federal interest in military procurement, see Sanner v. Ford Motor Co., 144 N.J.Super. 1, 9…

  19. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · December 23, 2009 · in the opinion

    Honeywell International, Inc. v. Guilder (2009)

    …redact this portion of the letter for use at trial. See MCI Exp., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 832 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Next, we turn to the second issue concerning the exclusion…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 10, 2007 · in the opinion

    Caradonna v. AW Chesterton Co., Inc. (2007)

    …New York, New York, Attention Timothy J. McHugh, Esq., Attorneys for Defendant General Motors Corporation. Landman Corsi Ballaine & Ford P.C., Newark, New Jersey, Attention Bhavna Changrani, Attorneys for Defendant LIRR and MTA. FREEDMAN, J. In…