No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

547 results for “General Electric”, page 24 of 28

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · April 7, 2008 · in the opinion

    O'connell v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2008)

    …information. The Navy specifications for these manuals contained detailed direction as to the kinds of information to be included.... The Navy relied on its training and procedures regarding general shipboard safety hazards, such as asbestos. The…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 15, 2022 · in the opinion

    Stansbury v. McCARTY Corporation (2022)

    …which specifically caused the third party's damages. . . \[and\] personal liability \[is not\] imposed upon the employee simply because of his general administrative responsibility for some function of employment. Kling Realty Co., Inc. v. Chevron USA…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · April 10, 2015 · in the opinion

    Schaffer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2015)

    …cited in the Petition that creates a federal cause of action. Moreover, a case with a general maritime nature requesting common law remedies does not provide a ground for federal jurisdiction. Pierce v. Parker Towing Co.…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 29, 2020 · in the opinion

    Jackson v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2020)

    …25-8 at 1. Similarly, Blanchard was employed by Avondale for over forty years as a supervisor, general superintendent, assistant vice president, and vice president, during which time he "oversaw the construction of all vessels." R…

  5. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · November 25, 2002 · in the opinion

    Campbell v. Lockheed Shipbuilding Corp. (2002)

    …Under section 905(a), a general contractor such as Lockheed will be "deemed" the employer of a subcontractor's employee for the sake of a compensation claim, but "only if the subcontractor fails to secure the…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · April 27, 2022 · in the opinion

    Israel v. John Crane, Inc. (2022)

    …932 F.2d 413, 415 (5th Cir. 1991) (holding that a cause of action under general maritime law "accrues when a plaintiff has had a reasonable opportunity to discover his injury, its cause, and the link…

  7. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 29, 1990 · in the opinion

    Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos (1990)

    … 388 (1965), observing that the section had previously been adopted as a general principle in the duty to warn area by previous Maryland cases. Section 388 states as follows: Chattel Known to Be Dangerous for Intended…

  8. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 21, 1995 · in the opinion

    Jadlowski v. Owens Corning (1995)

    …decision to admit this evidence rested in the sound discretion of the trial court, and the judge's decision will not be disturbed unless manifestly unjust. Ratner v. General Motors Corp., 241 N.J. Super. 197…

  9. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Sprague v. Abb, Inc. (2021)

    …exposure to a toxin; (2) that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness, or "general causation"; and (3) that plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness, or "specific…

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · April 13, 1982 · in the opinion

    Director, Office OF Workers'comp. v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co. (1982)

    …Corp. The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia recently has held that the Director has standing to appeal because of his general administrative responsibility and his financial interest in the special fund…

  11. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · June 19, 1990 · in the opinion

    Novelli v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1990)

    …60, 515 A.2d 1350 (1986). The Craig court discussed the general purpose of delay damages, as follows: Rule 238 was promulgated as an exercise of this Court's rule-making authority. It was a bold…

  12. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 11, 2003 · in the opinion

    Faulkner v. McCarty Corp. (2003)

    …of law; the inquiry is whether the plaintiff has any law (statutory, jurisprudential, or arising from general principles of fault) to support the claim that the defendant owed him a duty. Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 98…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Co. (2022)

    …judgment is disfavored when issues of intent or state of mind are involved, plaintiffs fail to consider that this is a general rule. The rule does not preclude this Court from evaluating the merits of such…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 1, 2009 · in the opinion

    Walmach v. Wheeler (2009)

    …probability that in the absence of the error, a result more favorable to the appealing party would have been reached." (Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 548, 574.) We Do Not Reach the…

  15. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit · June 26, 1985 · in the opinion

    Shuman v. United States (1985)

    …at 2674, we believe that the Court's unanimous opinion in Varig Airlines signaled that a more uniform and linear approach was to be utilized henceforth. Accord General Public Utilities Corporation v. United States, 745 F…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · August 23, 2016 · in the opinion

    Unterberg v. ExxonMobil Oil Corp. (2016)

    …¶¶ 12-13.) Thus, pursuant to the Manual, MOSATnot Mobil Oil — "has general responsibility for the international marine transportation system of the company," including the Subject Vessels. (See Waxman Affr., Ex. 14, at 477.) Plaintiff has therefore…

  17. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Aquitato v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 24, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)

    …than $10,000. Plaintiffs have not suggested that any defendant contests that it met the monetary threshold for application of the Walsh-Healey Act, and proof of defendants' general financial condition, overall income, or sales is…

  19. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 9, 2007 · in the opinion

    Herring v. Texaco, Inc. (2007)

    …bar date order has preclusive effect, it would call into question the "right to maintain the action," which implicates an exception to the general rule that this court will decline to review arguments abandoned below. Id…

  20. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · November 30, 2012 · in the opinion

    Ruppel v. CBS Corporation (2012)

    …and agents," the removal statute promotes litigating federal defenses (like official immunity) in a federal forum so that "the operations of the general government \[are not\] arrested at the will of one of \[the states\]." Id.…