767 results for “General Electric”, page 24 of 39
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · January 23, 2002 · in the opinion
Hoerner v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2002)
…indicates that Employers Commercial Union Insurance Co. issued a primary commercial general liability policy to Eagle during each of the one-year periods when Home Insurance issued the excess policy. The personal injury limit for the…
-
Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · November 21, 1997 · in the opinion
Faulkner Const. v. Silicosis Fund (1997)
…or other dust disease posing such a general threat to the industry. Hence whenever an employer asserts that the limitation of \[the predecessor statute\] should be applied to the dust disease causing the disability for which…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 24, 2021 · in the opinion
Sabetian v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc. (2021)
…court issue a remittitur for the dollar equivalent of twice the statutory compensation amount (that is, full statutory compensation for Sabetian's loss of his right testicle, and full compensation for impairment of his general health).
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · February 13, 1998 · in the opinion
LaBounty v. Coughlin (1998)
…70] Vincent Leong, Assistant Attorney General of the State of New York (Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney General of the State of New York, Barbara G. Billet, Solicitor General, Thomas D. Hughes, Assistant Solicitor General, New York…
-
Court case · Alabama Supreme Court · December 13, 2002 · in the opinion
Southern Bakeries, Inc. v. Knipp (2002)
…Id. In connection with that payment, State Farm obtained from Spooner a "general release." Id. In subsequent discussions with State Farm's claims adjuster, Spooner learned for the first time that the document she had signed…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 8, 2010 · in the opinion
Peter & Elpis Constantinides v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2010)
…125-8). Defendant asserts that this is a general, speculative statement and is insufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact. While it is true that Plaintiffs' expert does not directly controvert Defendant's expert…
-
Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · June 7, 2011 · in the opinion
Nye v. Bayer Cropscience, Inc. (2011)
…plans of reorganization for Raybestos and Johns Manville had been confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court before Mrs. Nye filed her complaint.\[11\] As a general matter, confirmation of the plan of reorganization ends the automatic stay…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 16, 2006 · in the opinion
8th Jud Dist Asbestos Litig (2006)
…However, "a duty and the corresponding liability it imposes do not rise from mere foreseeability of the harm" (Hamilton at 235-236 \[no general duty of care in the marketing and distribution of handguns\]; see Eiseman…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 3, 2008 · in the opinion
Benard v. Eagle, Inc. (2008)
…exceptional circumstances, especially in light of the general speedy manner in which this Court handles applications for rehearing when this Court is notified of the urgency of the need for prompt action. In Centanni v. Ford…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 27, 2019 · in the opinion
Schildknegt v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2019)
…App.4th 246, 251-254 \[affirming summary judgment in favor of general contractor on ground plaintiff lacked evidence he was present when the general contractor's employees performed insulation work likely to release asbestos dust\]; Casey…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 31, 1995 · in the opinion
Lineaweaver v. Plant Insulation Co. (1995)
…914 F.2d 360, 372-373, 383.) Other cases dispense entirely with evidence of where a product was used by merely requiring proof that it was in general use at an industrial facility. Thus, Martin v…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · April 14, 1995 · in the opinion
Kirk v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1995)
…the petit jury venire. The Supreme Court announced a general rule that "\[t\]he denial or impairment of the right \[to exercise peremptory challenges\] is reversible error without a showing of prejudice." Swain, 380 U.S…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · September 10, 1973 · in the opinion
Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation (1973)
…of the same danger. This inconsistency in the jury's verdicts, although puzzling, need not detain us. It has long been the rule that consistency in general verdicts is not required. Dunn v. United States, 1932…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · May 7, 2021 · in the opinion
Spurlin v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…be contrary to the command for uniformity between rules governing the same injury, whether under the Jones Act or under the general maritime law. See id. There being no evidence that punitive damages were traditionally awarded…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 25, 1999 · in the opinion
Owens Corning v. Walatka (1999)
…For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the general rule imposing the burden on the plaintiff should be applied in this case against appellees. A. THE BURDEN TO ESTABLISH THAT THE STATUTORY CAP DOES NOT…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of the Virgin Islands · September 27, 1991 · in the opinion
Dunn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass (1991)
…no complaint or cross complaint shall specify the amount of damages but shall contain a prayer for general relief and shall state that the damages are within the jurisdictional limits of the court to which the…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 26, 1982 · in the opinion
Hardy v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1982)
…Borel, we conclude that Borel, while conclusive as to the general matter of a duty to warn on the part of manufacturers of asbestos-containing insulation products, is ultimately ambiguous as to certain key issues. As…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · September 22, 1989 · in the opinion
Roller v. Basic Const. Co. (1989)
…the time of occurrence of an "injury by accident" is ordinarily obvious. But the General Assembly, realizing that ascertainment of this critical point in time would present great difficulty in the case of the insidious onset…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · March 11, 2025 · in the opinion
Keller v. Exxonmobil Oil Corporation (2025)
…for the proposition that, "in a Jones Act case, the plaintiff is only required to prove general exposure to asbestos aboard the employer's vessel." (Docket entry no. 54 ("Pl. Kradin Mem.") at 8-10 (emphasis…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · December 2, 2004 · in the opinion
In re Combustion Engineering, Inc. (2004)
…Insurance Company, successor to Insurance Company of North America); Pacific Employers Insurance Company; Central National Insurance Company of Omaha (solely with respect to policies issued through its managing general agent, Cravens, Dargan & Company, Pacific Coast), Appellants…