542 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 24 of 28
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · January 27, 2011 · in the opinion
Fisher v. Alliance Machine Co. (2011)
…employed there. Accordingly, we disagree that it qualifies as a written admission. {¶ 42} Fisher's estate also attached several invoices from Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, purporting to show that Clark distributed asbestos products, specifically, Kaylo pipe…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 14, 2015 · in the opinion
Ricci v. Cleaver-Brooks (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)
…that the moving defendant's predecessors worked on the site doing the type of work that plaintiff observed\]). In addition, issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · October 31, 2022 · in the opinion
Reulet v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)
…a). In making this assessment, the Court must view all evidence and make all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs and Avondale—the non-moving parties. Owens v. Circassia Pharms., Inc., 33 F…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 30, 2009 · in the opinion
In re Asbestos Litigation v. Adel Wiggins Group (2009)
…a colorable federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Coming Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 13, 2016 · in the opinion
Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…is key to a plaintiffs claim. Id. A claim for failure to warn may be based on a theory of negligence or strict liability. O'Flynn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, 759 So. 2d 526, 535 (Miss…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · March 28, 2005 · in the opinion
Nesbiet v. General Electric Co. (2005)
…Faulk v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.,\[59\] which involved a failure-to-warn claim arising from the plaintiffs' exposure to asbestos at a job site where the defendants manufactured various products for the federal government, the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · September 24, 2010 · in the opinion
Hagen v. Benjamin Foster Co. (2010)
…a colorable federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021 · in the opinion
Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)
…of such a nature as to raise a reasonable inference that \[s\]he inhaled asbestos fibers that emanated from it.'" Wilson, 807 A.2d at 923 (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 1999 Pa. Super…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · December 2, 2004 · in the opinion
Holdampf v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2004)
…the defendants' motions for summary judgment, and the defendants based their appellate argument on the Widera rationale that an employer owes no duty of care to non-employees for injuries occurring off-premises (id. at 752)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)
…proof, plaintiff cannot overcome Westinghouse's summary judgment motion based on alleged exposure to asbestos in electrical gear at Alabama River Pulp. See generally Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 595 So.2d 443, 457 (Ala.
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion
Faddish v. Buffalo Pumps (2012)
…Ferayorni v. Hyundai Motor Co., 711 So.2d 1167, 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), following Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 53 Cal.3d 987, 281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549, 558 (1991). Under…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 15, 2015 · in the opinion
Soto v. BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. (2015)
…that it was more likely than not that Medina was exposed to asbestos at ASARCO. Plaintiffs argue that Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650 \[33 Cal.Rptr.2d 702\] (Dumin)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · March 24, 2016
Holland v. Airco, Inc. (2016)
…and Goulds Pumps, ending the plaintiff's claims over Owen Holland's mesothelioma death. Under Alabama law a plaintiff must first prove exposure to an asbestos-containing product for which the defendant is responsible. Evidence that…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 14, 2006
Rettig v. Gen. Motors Corp. (2006)
…his employer knew of asbestos dangers. The Wellman rule, under which a premises owner owes no duty to an independent contractor's employees doing inherently dangerous work, applies only if the contractor or its employee knew…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · July 18, 2007
Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Company (2007)
…and sewer pipe in Pittsburgh. He later worked at the Anchor Hocking glass plant, where he was exposed to asbestos cement used to repair glass-annealing ovens (lehrs), to pipe covering, and to transite mill board…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · March 17, 2015
Calewarts v. CR Meyer & Sons Company (2015)
…worked from 1950 until 1991 for Milprint at its De Pere, Wisconsin plant, where steam pipes and press ovens were covered with white insulation. She alleged CR Meyer & Sons installed, repaired and removed the asbestos insulation…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 25, 2005
Rehm v. Navistar International (2005)
…said he was exposed to asbestos insulation on pipes, furnaces, ovens and machinery while tearing out and installing equipment, and it claimed the owners were liable as premises owners. The owners argued that Kentucky's workers'…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · July 11, 2000
Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corp. v. Faulk (2000)
…employer. The Fourth Circuit affirmed. It held that the last employer in which the worker was exposed to a potentially injurious stimulus owes the full award, and that substantial evidence supported the finding of exposure. It…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 4, 2004
Wajer v. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (2004)
…asbestos insulation and products nearby. The circuit court granted summary judgment to BGE, reasoning that a landowner owes no duty to an independent contractor's employees. The Court of Special Appeals affirmed. It held that several…
-
Court case · Indiana Supreme Court · June 28, 2005
Psi Energy, Inc. v. Roberts (2005)
…absent negligent selection, and a landowner ordinarily owes no liability to a contractor's employees for a condition the contractor was hired to address when the landowner has no superior knowledge. A general verdict stands if…