No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

547 results for “General Electric”, page 25 of 28

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 30, 2022 · in the opinion

    Tabor v. William B. Reily & Co., Inc. (2022)

    …2021 removal of this action untimely. Defendant otherwise invokes the federal officer removal statute. That statute, unlike the general removal statute, must be liberally interpreted, but it is not limitless.\[26\] The removing party has the…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 4, 2022 · in the opinion

    Stansbury v. McCARTY Corporation (2022)

    …1165 (5th Cir. 1989). There, the Fifth Circuit found that "federal question jurisdiction can only be obtained for claims regarding the LHWCA under the general federal question provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1331." Id. Accordingly…

  3. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 5, 1995 · in the opinion

    Schiavo v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)

    …of the videotape. See State v. Wilson, 135 N.J. 4, 17, 637 A.2d 1237 (1994) and Balian v. General Motors, 121 N.J. Super. 118, 125, 296 A.2d 317 (App.Div. 1972), certif…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 11, 2015 · in the opinion

    Murat v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2015)

    …other grounds. \[4\] The evidence showed that Mr. Murat was in charge of Port Welding; Port Welding was the general contractor on each job; Port Welding supplied its own tools, but used the ship's gaskets…

  5. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · February 21, 2019 · in the opinion

    New York City Asbestos Litig (2019)

    …In Wicker, several plaintiffs sued their employer for asbestos-related injuries. The parties settled, and the plaintiffs each signed a general release. Thereafter, the plaintiffs filed another lawsuit. The plaintiffs in Wicker conceded that their earlier…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 2, 2022 · in the opinion

    Adams v. Eagle, Inc. (2022)

    …in which, for example, one circuit held "\[w\]hen only minimal or very general requirements are set for the contractor by the United States the \[government contractor defense\] is inapplicable." \[127\] Accordingly, under Boyle, in this…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 28, 2005 · in the opinion

    Lindstrom v. AC Product Liability Trust (2005)

    …a plaintiff is no longer required to show substantial exposure. The Stark opinion and general logic may suggest that, where an expert witness can testify unequivocally that a defendant's product was the source of the…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · November 19, 2012 · in the opinion

    Stevens v. CBS Corporation (2012)

    …that the "type of incident involved" have "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce," and that "the general character of the activity giving rise to the incident shows a substantial relationship to traditional maritime activity." Id…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · September 13, 2022 · in the opinion

    Webb v. 3M Company (2022)

    …Inc., 200 F.3d 335, 339 (5th Cir. 2000). But unlike the general removal statute, the Court must broadly construe the federal officer removal statute in favor of a federal forum. Williams v. Lockheed Martin Corp.…

  10. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · December 14, 2010 · in the opinion

    Macias v. Mine Safety Appliances Co. (2010)

    …Macias acknowledges that Simonetta and Braaten "did announce a general rule that manufacturers have no duty to warn of dangers of a product that the manufacturer did not make\[,\]" but he argues that "\[t\]he specific…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 4, 2024 · in the opinion

    Sentilles v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2024)

    …2) whether the theory has been subjected to peer review and publication; (3) the known or potential rate of error; and (4) the general acceptance of the methodology in the scientific community. Id. at 593-95…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 23, 2010 · in the opinion

    Cowley v. Acands, Inc. (2010)

    …deceased, former testimony is not excluded under the general rule disallowing the admission of hearsay.\[4\] Former testimony is \[t\]estimony given as a witness at another hearing of the same or a different proceeding, or…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 28, 2022 · in the opinion

    Falgout v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2022)

    …Lockheed Martin Corp., 990 F.3d 852, 859 (5th Cir. 2021) ("unlike the general removal statute, the federal officer removal statute is to be \broadly construed' in favor of a federal forum"). Nevertheless, it remains the…

  14. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 11, 2001 · in the opinion

    Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)

    …that economic theories which attempt to extrapolate the "value" of human life from various studies of wages, costs, etc., have no place in the calculation of general damages. See also Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 14, 2003 · in the opinion

    Cossman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2003)

    …28, 61 Cal.Rptr.2d 518.) Section 361 Requires Application of Indiana Law In general, whether a claim is barred by a statute of limitations "is a procedural matter governed by the law of the forum…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas · September 25, 2006 · in the opinion

    Jacobs v. Tapscott (2006)

    …defendants posit that, despite Hendrix's deposition testimony that he was not expressing an opinion on the general value of mesothelioma cases or on the Jacobs Litigation, in his supplemental letter he opines that no one…

  17. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 20, 2008 · in the opinion

    Thibodeaux v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2008)

    …trial, district court entered a judgment on the jury verdict for the vessel owner, but granted the widow's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) and awarded general and special damages. The vessel owner appealed…

  18. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · April 29, 2022 · in the opinion

    Deem v. William Powell Co. (2022)

    …1434 (1997), noted that "twice the Supreme Court has been presented with federal statute of limitations language materially identical to that in the general maritime statute of limitations, and twice the Supreme Court has held that…

  19. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 27, 2013 · in the opinion

    Logan v. AP Miller-Maersk, Inc. (2013)

    …the business of the acquired corporation; and continuity of management, personnel, physical location, assets and general business operation. . . Not all of these elements are necessary to find a de facto merger. Courts will look to whether…

  20. Court case · Massachusetts Appeals Court · December 11, 1997 · in the opinion

    Thayer v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation (1997)

    …Mass. App. Ct. 423, 427 (1981). See also Swartz v. General Motors Corp., 375 Mass. 628, 631 (1978) (privity a valid defense where sale and injury both occurred prior to 1973); Mansfield v. GAF Corp., 5…