532 results for “General Electric”, page 25 of 27
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · January 7, 2022 · in the opinion
Data v. Joy Global Underground Mining (2022)
…contained asbestos. Joy also argues that to the extent that Plaintiff alleges that he was exposed to asbestos by being in the general vicinity when others performed repairs with which he was not helping, there is…
-
Court case · Missouri Supreme Court · February 18, 2020 · in the opinion
Hegger v. Valley Farm Dairy Company (2020)
…2012) (holding the term "injury" in the Act encompassed occupational diseases). The general assembly amended the workers' compensation law in 2013 to provide the exclusive remedy for occupational diseases caused by toxic exposure in the workplace…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 6, 2023 · in the opinion
Roadarmel v. Curtiss-Wright Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2023)
…at 322. The Defendant does not identify which counts of the complaint should arguably be dismissed and refers only to general descriptions of them as "ancillary" or "incidental." (D.I. 26 at 14) In arguing for…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 24, 2020 · in the opinion
Linder v. AW Chesterton Co. (2020)
…of personal jurisdiction, arguing that it is a Georgia corporation with its principal place of business in Georgia and had no contacts with Illinois to subject it to the circuit court's general jurisdiction. As to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion
Evans v. Flowserve US Inc. (2017)
…must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 28, 2005 · in the opinion
Lindstrom v. AC Product Liability Trust (2005)
…a plaintiff is no longer required to show substantial exposure. The Stark opinion and general logic may suggest that, where an expert witness can testify unequivocally that a defendant's product was the source of the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 18, 2020 · in the opinion
Whitehead v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)
…he was "pretty sure" there were "some Anchor\[ \]" valves there. (See ECF No. 312-1 at 23.) As a general matter, Mr. Draughn testified that "if a valve needed replacing" a supervisor "could send \[a mechanic…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · November 19, 2012 · in the opinion
Stevens v. CBS Corporation (2012)
…that the "type of incident involved" have "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce," and that "the general character of the activity giving rise to the incident shows a substantial relationship to traditional maritime activity." Id…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · September 13, 2022 · in the opinion
Webb v. 3M Company (2022)
…Inc., 200 F.3d 335, 339 (5th Cir. 2000). But unlike the general removal statute, the Court must broadly construe the federal officer removal statute in favor of a federal forum. Williams v. Lockheed Martin Corp.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 30, 2023 · in the opinion
Ragusa v. Louisiana Guaranty Insurance Association (2023)
…Expert testimony is required to establish causation, and a court may admit specific-causation evidence only after the plaintiff has produced admissible evidence on general causation. Id. To show specific causation in a toxic tort case…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 21, 2017 · in the opinion
Tallman v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…by Mr. Tallman. (D.I. 97 at 5-7) Plaintiff's references to general block exposure do not assist the court in determining to which specific components Mr. Tallman was exposed. (See D.I. 91 at…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 24, 2019 · in the opinion
Stock v. Jenkins Bros. (IN the Matter of the Eighth Judicial District Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…with Jenkins valves' asbestos-containing components: "Q. Now what asbestos-containing products did you handle or use or replace, with respect to the Jenkins valves, the general types of products? A. Well, on that specific valve…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 11, 2001 · in the opinion
Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)
…that economic theories which attempt to extrapolate the "value" of human life from various studies of wages, costs, etc., have no place in the calculation of general damages. See also Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 24, 2008 · in the opinion
Cunningham v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2008)
…booster pumps, the bilge pumps, and fire and flushing pumps. Cunningham would have had technical manuals for such products available. In general, the manufacturers would provide their equipment to the shipyard, which would assemble, install, and…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · April 29, 2022 · in the opinion
Deem v. William Powell Co. (2022)
…1434 (1997), noted that "twice the Supreme Court has been presented with federal statute of limitations language materially identical to that in the general maritime statute of limitations, and twice the Supreme Court has held that…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 26, 2019 · in the opinion
Harris v. Triple A Machine Shop, Inc. (2019)
…room or in boilers may have contained asbestos, and even accepting that it was Triple A's general practice to remove such materials in ways generating respirable dust and fibers, Plaintiffs' discovery responses are devoid of…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 24, 2015 · in the opinion
Best v. The William Powell Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)
…engine, pumps, valves, steam traps, and turbines, and general cleanup. After he left the Navy, Best performed brake jobs on vehicles using asbestos-containing brakes. (NYSCEF 95). Defendants remaining in his action are Carrier Corporation, Goulds…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · July 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)
…concerning the character or quality of the chattel in question," and "does not apply to statements of opinion," "loose general praise," "sales talk," or "puffing." These requirements and limitations suggest that the misrepresentation must be affirmative…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · May 10, 2017 · in the opinion
Harris v. Deere & Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…them on machinery or sold them through the Deere network of independent dealers as Genuine John Deere parts." Plaintiff also submitted a document titled "Instruction and Parts List for John Deere General Purpose Tractor" from 1940…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 1, 2010 · in the opinion
Crane v. Linkus (2010)
…appellee's motion and entered judgment in the amount requested. Appellant noted an appeal to this Court. General Background Before addressing the causation issue in this case, it may be helpful to place it into context…