No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

736 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 26 of 37

  1. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · December 12, 1990 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Edwards (1990)

    …of accrual of a cause of action for latent disease, its confusion is a product of our inconsistency. We find our decisions in Ford Motor Co., Tabor Motor Co. and Staheli to be persuasive and controlling…

  2. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 19, 2008 · in the opinion

    Wright v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2008)

    …Corp., Chrysler Corp., Crane Co., Crane Packing, Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., Ford Motor Co., Foster Wheeler Corp., Garlock, Inc., General Electric Co., General Motors Corp., Goulds Pumps, Inc., Green Tweed & Co., Inc., Hopeman Brothers, Inc.…

  3. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · July 22, 2015 · in the opinion

    Baumgartner v. American Standard, Inc. (2015)

    …C. § 2315.21(B). Here, there is clearly a conflict as to the assessment of punitive damages. See e.g., Dodson v. Ford Motor Co., 2006 WL 2642199, at [\2] (R.I. Super. Sept. 5, 2006…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 28, 1988 · in the opinion

    Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1988)

    …See Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1163 (4th Cir.1986) ("permissible inferences must ... be within the range of reasonable probability") (quoting Ford Motor Co. v. McDavid, 259 F.2d 261, 266 (4th…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · December 9, 1986 · in the opinion

    In re Hawaii Federal Asbestos Cases (1986)

    …920(3). This imputed knowledge test is, therefore, clearly not inconsistent with strict products liability. See e.g. Wood v. Ford Motor Co., 71 Or.App. 87, 691 P.2d 495 (1984), rev. den., 298 Or…

  6. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · May 20, 1992 · in the opinion

    Baione v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1992)

    …1976). When a set of facts will support both a theory of common law negligence and strict liability, a plaintiff is entitled to proceed on either theory or both. Ford Motor Co. v. Hill, 404 So…

  7. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Knight (2015)

    …and consequently cannot have an error rate."); Anderson v. Ford Motor Co., 950 F.Supp.2d 1217, 1224-1225 (D.Utah 2013) ("every exposure" opinion excluded under Daubert as not testable and having no known error…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 9, 2009 · in the opinion

    Oxford v. Foster Wheeler LLC (2009)

    …instructions." (Hasson v. Ford Motor Co. (1977) 19 Cal.3d 530, 540 \[138 Cal.Rptr. 705, 564 P.2d 857\] (Hasson), overruled in part on other grounds in Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal…

  9. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of New Jersey · August 12, 2014 · in the opinion

    In re GI Holdings, Inc. (2014)

    …denied \_\_\_ U.S. \_\_\_, 132 S.Ct. 112, 181 L.Ed.2d 38 (2011); In re Ford Motor Co. Speed Control Deactivation Switch Prod. Liab. Lit., 664 F.Supp.2d 752, 763 n.2 (E.D.Mich…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · October 24, 2019 · in the opinion

    Evans v. John Crane, Inc. (2019)

    …expert must testify about matters requiring scientific, technical or specialized knowledge; and (3) the expert's testimony must assist the trier of fact." Pineda v. Ford Motor Co., 520 F.3d 237, 244 (3d Cir. 2008)…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 28, 2017 · in the opinion

    Sandoval v. American Appliance Manufacturing Corp. (2017)

    …adjudication on the Sandovals' claims. AAMC requested summary judgment on two grounds. Relying on the holding in Campbell v. Ford Motor Co. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 15, 34 (Campbell), which our Supreme Court recently disapproved…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Evans v. Imo Industries, Inc. (2019)

    …by Captain Moore in forming his opinion regarding Navy warning requirements do not have the requisite "fit" to assist the trier of fact. See Oddi v. Ford Motor Co., 234 F.3d 136, 145 (3d Cir…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 17, 2015 · in the opinion

    Melendrez v. Ameron International Corporation (2015)

    …one of the many factors to be taken into consideration by the trial judge" in deciding reasonableness of section 998 offer\].) We find Adams v. Ford Motor Co. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 1475 (Adams) instructive…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion

    Krik v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2017)

    …1992); United States v. Dixon, 413 F.3d 520, 524-25 (5th Cir. 2005); Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F.Supp.3d 841, 862 (E.D.N.C. 2015); Betz v. Pneumo Abex, LLC, 615…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 31, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bell v. Abb Group, Inc. (2015)

    …806 (7th Cir. 2013) (Daubert "remains the gold standard for evaluating the reliability of expert testimony."). The Seventh Circuit's Opinion in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2000) provides the…

  16. Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 29, 2015 · in the opinion

    Aubin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2015)

    …in section 402A of the Second Restatement. Id. at 155. In making this determination, the Fourth District relied on Force v. Ford Motor Co., 879 So. 2d 103, 106 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), which held that "\…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 6, 2021 · in the opinion

    Khosravan v. Chevron Corporation (2021)

    …offer, the judgment constitutes prima facie evidence showing the offer was reasonable and the offeror is eligible for costs as specified in section 998."'" (Adams v. Ford Motor Co. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 1475, 1484…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana · September 16, 2020 · in the opinion

    Hostetler v. Johnson Controls, Inc. (2020)

    …An inability to prove that a particular exposure is "safe" is not the same as proof that exposure at that level has a causal connection to adverse effects. Anderson v. Ford Motor Co., 950 F. Supp…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 25, 2021 · in the opinion

    In re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (2021)

    …case that J&J has the burden of proving that the attorney-client privilege and/or work-product doctrine applies. See, e.g., Johnson v. Ford Motor Co., C.A. No. 13-06529, 2015 WL 5193568…

  20. Court case · Georgia Supreme Court · July 5, 2016 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Knight (2016)

    …through use of expert testimony, a significant and sustained exposure in the plaintiff's history."). See also Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F.Supp.3d 841, 862 (E.D.N.C. 2015) (testimony inadmissible where…