547 results for “General Electric”, page 26 of 28
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 26, 2019 · in the opinion
Harris v. Triple A Machine Shop, Inc. (2019)
…room or in boilers may have contained asbestos, and even accepting that it was Triple A's general practice to remove such materials in ways generating respirable dust and fibers, Plaintiffs' discovery responses are devoid of…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · February 27, 1992 · in the opinion
Stevenson v. Keene Corp. (1992)
…mid 1980's, concern over the insurance industry and tort litigation prompted many reports on both a national and state level. See United States Attorney General's Tort Policy Working Group, Report on the Causes, Extent…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · April 14, 2023 · in the opinion
Ollerton v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company (2023)
…further noting that the Joint Stipulation renders Defendant's Supplement to Notice of Removal moot). I. LEGAL STANDARD In general, "any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · August 5, 1985 · in the opinion
Rosenberg v. Celotex Corp. (1985)
…101, 108 N.E. 217 (1915), and Carrick v. Central General Hospital, 51 N.Y.2d 242, 434 N.Y.S.2d 130, 414 N.E.2d 632 (1980), in support of her argument that she…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 1, 2010 · in the opinion
Crane v. Linkus (2010)
…appellee's motion and entered judgment in the amount requested. Appellant noted an appeal to this Court. General Background Before addressing the causation issue in this case, it may be helpful to place it into context…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 8, 2020 · in the opinion
Hernandez v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2020)
…2002). The Court must consider if "the plaintiff has any law (statutory, jurisprudential, or arising from the general principles of fault) to support that the defendant owed him a duty." Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc.…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · February 24, 2020 · in the opinion
Latiolais v. Huntington Ingalls, Incorporated (2020)
…prosecution." This reading is also unpersuasive. To start, the canon against surplusage yields to context as it expresses courts' "general \reluctan\[ce\] to treat statutory terms as surplusage.'" Bd. of Trs. of Leland Stanford Junior Univ…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 21, 2009 · in the opinion
DiBenedetto v. Noble Drilling Company (2009)
…article 1671 mandates that a judgment dismissing a defendant, at plaintiff's request, prior to a general appearance by that defendant must be without prejudice. We disagree with CTS's interpretation of La. C.C.P…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 31, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos, 2021)
…To ensure reliability, the Court "assess\[es\] the \[expert's\] reasoning or methodology, using as appropriate such criteria as testability, publication in peer reviewed literature, and general acceptance." Id. at 564. III. DISCUSSION A. Motion to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 22, 2007 · in the opinion
Ballenger v. Agco Corporation (2007)
…S. 423 (1999), It is the general rule that an action may be removed from state court to federal court only if a federal district court would have original jurisdiction over the claim in suit. To…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · December 15, 1988 · in the opinion
Whatley v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1988)
…474 (5th Cir.1985); see Shipp v. General Motors Corp., 750 F.2d 418, 425 (5th Cir.1985) (Duncan placed the allocative burden of comparative causation on the defendant). Sufficiency of the Evidence Whatley contends that…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 13, 2022 · in the opinion
Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)
…judgment is disfavored when issues of intent or state of mind are involved, plaintiffs fail to consider that this is a general rule. The rule does not preclude this Court from evaluating the merits of such…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · October 5, 1981 · in the opinion
White v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1981)
…admiralty jurisdiction and rejected claims under the Extension of Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C. § 740, or the general maritime law, 28 U.S.C. § 1333, because the alleged injuries bore no reasonable relationship to traditional…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 3, 2024 · in the opinion
Hotard v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2024)
…F.2d 1078, 1081 (5th Cir. 1984) ("Long-established general principles of interpreting indemnity agreements require that indemnification for an indemnitee's own negligence be clearly and unequivocally expressed."); see also Donahue v. Republic Nat'l…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 6, 2014 · in the opinion
McMann v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2014)
…In this way, the statute "promotes litigating federal defenses in a federal forum so that \the operations of the general government \[are not\] arrested at the will of one of \[the states\]." Ruppel v. CBS Corp…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 27, 2023 · in the opinion
Ragusa v. Louisiana Guaranty Insurance Association (2023)
…2007)). So, although the Fifth Circuit has made clear that the "general rule" is to decline to exercise jurisdiction over state law claims after all federal claims are eliminated from a case, this rule is "neither…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Minton (2013)
…Scindia, 451 U.S. at 167. Exxon argues that there was no active involvement because its supervision did not extend beyond general oversight. Using the language of the court in Dow v. Oldendorff Carriers GMBH & Co.…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 3, 1982 · in the opinion
Staiano v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1982)
…Pa.R.App.P. 301(a). Appellants acknowledge the general rule that an issue not argued below may not be argued on appeal, but nevertheless assert that their argument is not waived. They say: [\293] The…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Jack v. Dco, LLC (2019)
…both companies. (Id.) C. The Jury's Verdict The court provided the jury a general verdict form on which the jury was asked whether Plaintiffs proved their strict liability design defect, strict liability failure-to-warn…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 20, 2013 · in the opinion
Botts v. US (2013)
…Id.) Mr. Eberhard states that, when employees worked with asbestos materials in "saw shacks," the shacks grew quite dusty, and employees often opened the door to allow dust to escape into the general atmosphere. (Eberhard Dec. ¶…