532 results for “General Electric”, page 26 of 27
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 24, 2009 · in the opinion
Cashman v. Pacific Scientific Company (2009)
…was presumptively a part of furnace insulation during the 1960s and 1970s. He testified, "My experience and the general understanding is that while there may have been Marigold ceramics, other options available, as there are today…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 31, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos, 2021)
…To ensure reliability, the Court "assess\[es\] the \[expert's\] reasoning or methodology, using as appropriate such criteria as testability, publication in peer reviewed literature, and general acceptance." Id. at 564. III. DISCUSSION A. Motion to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · July 21, 2017 · in the opinion
Haskins v. 3M Company (2017)
…tested; (2) has been subjected to peer review and publication; (3) has a known or potential rate of error; and (4) has attained general acceptance in the pertinent scientific community. See id. at 593-94. In…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 22, 2017 · in the opinion
Appleton v. Allied Signal (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · September 11, 2017 · in the opinion
MacCormack v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2017)
…911 (Mass. App. Ct. 1987) (reasoning that a worsening of a condition did not justify a subsequent new action as "\[t\]he general rule is, of course, that a plaintiff the "identity of issues" factor. 8…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 13, 2004 · in the opinion
Smalls v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. (2004)
…Trial, 12/4/01, at 32. Appellant argues that the opinion was inadmissible because it had no basis in fact nor general acceptance in the scientific community. We disagree. ¶ 11 Again, we observe that the admission…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 6, 2014 · in the opinion
McMann v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2014)
…In this way, the statute "promotes litigating federal defenses in a federal forum so that \the operations of the general government \[are not\] arrested at the will of one of \[the states\]." Ruppel v. CBS Corp…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · August 6, 2020 · in the opinion
Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig. v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2020)
…toxin, that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness (general causation) and that plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness (specific causation)" (Parker v Mobil Oil Corp., 7…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · January 21, 2016 · in the opinion
Holzworth v. Alfa Laval Inc. (2016)
…in causing the injury he suffered." See Lindstrom v. A-C Prod. Liab. Tr., 424 F.3d 488, 492 (6th Cir. 2005) (general maritime law); In re Joint E. & S. Dists. Asbestos Litig., No. 92 Civ…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 8, 2010 · in the opinion
Cashman v. Pacific Scientific Company (2010)
…potential importance or relevance of the missing evidence and (2) the culpability or fault of the adverse party. "After weighing these two general factors, the trial court uses its discretion to craft an appropriate sanction." Homeworks…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Jack v. Dco, LLC (2019)
…both companies. (Id.) C. The Jury's Verdict The court provided the jury a general verdict form on which the jury was asked whether Plaintiffs proved their strict liability design defect, strict liability failure-to-warn…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 7, 2019 · in the opinion
Rogers v. Asbestos Corp. Limited (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…2d 1116 (Del. Super. 1986). It is well-established that a plaintiff does not meet his burden of proof by simply placing the product at the general work site. Conway v. A.C.& S, C.A…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 16, 2007 · in the opinion
Aguirre v. Long IS. Rail RD. Co. (2007)
…motion, the LIRR primarily argues that the plaintiffs failed at trial to proffer legally sufficient evidence to support their claims of general and specific causation with respect to their alleged exposure to asbestos and unidentified dusts…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 17, 2018 · in the opinion
Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2018)
…and consortium. Id. \[25\] The Green court recognized a narrow exception to the general rule against recovery for premarital injuries in toxic exposure cases, where the injured spouse does not or cannot know of the injury…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 3, 2013 · in the opinion
Barawa v. Acker Drill Co. (2013)
…to warn against asbestos-containing products that were manufactured by third-party suppliers. While in general the court will not even consider arguments made for the first time in reply papers, Azzopardi v American Blower Corp.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)
…No. 828 684, Answers of Defendant John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. in Response to General Order No. 29 Interrogatories 6:4-18, 12:4-7). Defendant's gasket sheet materials were "various shades of grey, with Defendant…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · April 17, 2014 · in the opinion
Sclafani v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2014)
…Rptr. 456 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Consistent with this general rule, the California Supreme Court held in Rutherford that an asbestos personal injury plaintiff need not prove with certainty that the defendant's product…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 25, 2011 · in the opinion
Graham v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2011)
…is contemplated by it. Moreover, if defendant is concerned that plaintiffs counsel is on a general fishing expedition, then defendant's remedy is to screen and redact any information beyond the scope of plaintiffs request. Accordingly…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 31, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos, 2021)
…es\] the \[expert's\] reasoning or methodology, using as appropriate such criteria as testability, publication in peer reviewed literature, and general acceptance." Id. at 564. III. DISCUSSION Defendants contend that Captain Burger should not be allowed…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · September 27, 2023 · in the opinion
Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)
…officer removal statute, Leite, 749 F.3d at 1122 ("We recognize that defendants enjoy much broader removal rights under the federal officer removal statute than they do under the general removal statute\[.\]"); Durham, 445 F.3d…