No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

980 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 26 of 49

  1. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · June 2, 2017 · in the opinion

    Landreth v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2017)

    …causation where there are many possible sources of asbestos exposure, jurisdictions have fashioned different causation standards: "1) the California Supreme Court's \exposure-to-risk' test of Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 25, 2016 · in the opinion

    Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)

    …defendant "\on a regular basis, over some extended period of time, in proximity to where the \[plaintiff\] actually worked'" (quoting Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162-63 (4th Cir. 1986) (emphasis omitted…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion

    Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)

    …C. 2007). The South Carolina Supreme Court has adopted the "frequency, regularity and proximity test" set forth by the Fourth Circuit in Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156 (4th Cir. 1986). Henderson, 644…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · November 19, 2015 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. AC&S, Inc. (2015)

    …Paper Corporation; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Rapid American Corporation; Selby, Battersby & Co.; Uniroyal, Inc.; Waco Insulation, Inc.; Garlock, Inc.; and Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. ECF No. 1-1. \[3\] See also Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 16, 2014 · in the opinion

    Sherin v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. (2014)

    …evidence of exposure to the defendant's asbestos. See Reiter v. Pneumo Abex, LLC, 8 A.3d 725, 729 (Md. 2010); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia, 602 A.2d 1182, 1184 (Md. 1992). \[33\] This evidence…

  6. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · July 15, 2016 · in the opinion

    Mannahan v. Eaton Corporation (2016)

    …similar products at the same time periods and worksites. Not uncommonly, plaintiffs have been unable to prove direct exposure to a given defendant's product." Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 941 P.2d 1203, 1218 (Cal…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion

    Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)

    …C. 2007). The South Carolina Supreme Court has adopted the "frequency, regularity and proximity test" set forth by the Fourth Circuit in Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156 (4th Cir. 1986). Henderson, 644…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · September 16, 2020 · in the opinion

    Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2020)

    …a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" Id. (quoting Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162-63 (4th Cir…

  9. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 22, 2022 · in the opinion

    Budd v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2022)

    …on its design defect decision. Instead, the jury based its award on Budd's injuries, which relate to all three claims. See Mavroudis v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp., 86 Wash. App. 22, 36, 935 P.2d 684…

  10. Court case · California Supreme Court · December 1, 2016 · in the opinion

    Kesner v. Superior Court and Haver (2016)

    …. ."\]; accord, Alcaraz v. Vece (1997) 14 Cal.4th 1149, 1156.) In determining whether a premises owner owes a duty to persons on its property, we apply the Rowland factors. (See, e.g., Thai v. Stang (1989…

  11. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 11, 2023 · in the opinion

    Jordonek v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2023)

    …Inc.\[1\] In Richards, the Supreme Court wrote: Our starting point to answer the Ohio law question is the Fourth Circuit's decision in Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. In Lohrmann, the plaintiff argued that a…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · October 15, 2019 · in the opinion

    Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair (2019)

    …against Edelbrock Corporation are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED. \[1\] Edelbrock, LLC alleges it has been erroneously sued as Edelbrock Corporation. \[2\] Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156 (4th Cir. 1986).

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York · May 21, 1990

    Kreppein v. Owens-Illinois (In re New York Asbestos Litigation, 1990)

    The court granted Owens-Illinois' motion for reconsideration, held the widow's claims against it barred by collateral estoppel, and vacated the judgment as to it; it denied the JNOV, new trial and remittitur motions of…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · February 26, 1990

    Raney v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1990)

    …Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment of about $450,000 for the widow, Edna Raney, against Owens-Illinois, Celotex and Raymark, holding the evidence let the jury find the missing asbestos warnings were a proximate…

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · June 16, 2000

    Chrabas v. Owens-Illinois (Matter of Eighth Judicial District Asbestos Litigation, 2000)

    The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's order denying Owens-Illinois's motion to apply Florida law to loss allocation issues and directing that New York law apply, so the plaintiffs prevailed on the choice…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · June 6, 2017

    Pecher v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2017)

    The Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of the plaintiffs' claims against Weyerhaeuser and Owens-Illinois, and ordered plaintiffs' counsel to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Claims by employees whose asbestos…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 11, 2016

    Ney v. Owens-Illinois (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2016)

    …faith to block removal, so Owens-Illinois's late removal was timely and stood. Removal more than one year after commencement is allowed where the plaintiff acted in bad faith to prevent removal; joining a non…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · September 9, 2015

    Suoja v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2015)

    Denied Owens-Illinois's motion for summary judgment, which argued mootness, lack of standing and issue preclusion, so plaintiff Gary Suoja's claims continued; plaintiff's motion for leave to file a surreply was denied as…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 13, 2020

    Blystone v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2020)

    John R. Blystone and his wife sued many defendants, claiming he developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure. This order concerned only U.S. Steel, which employed him for two weeks in 1960. He testified that he worked eight-hour days in a…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 6, 2016

    Ney v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2016)

    …at Bethlehem Steel from 1948 to 1953. A co-worker named only Owens-Illinois's Kaylo pipe covering and Quigley's Insulag spray as asbestos products at that site. Plaintiff sought documents and a corporate witness…