No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

542 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 26 of 28

  1. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2017 · in the opinion

    Rublee v. Carrier Corporation (2017)

    …Jan. 12, 2015) (court order). \[12\] Owen v. Burlington N. Santa Fe R.R. Co., 153 Wn.2d 780, 787, 108 P.3d 1220 (2005). \[13\] Owen, 153 Wn.2d at 787. \[14\] Lybbert v. Grant…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 21, 2008 · in the opinion

    Early v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2008)

    …Grumman Aircraft Corp. From 1965 through 1993, he worked as a millwright, maintaining machinery, including presses, ovens, boilers, pumps, and valves. He worked in the boiler room and assisted in dismantling the boiler room, which he…

  3. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · December 27, 2017 · in the opinion

    Bechtel Corporation v. Batchelor (2017)

    …possession and control of all or part of the plant such that it owed Mr. Batchelor the same duty that a landowner owes an invitee under the law of premises liability. For the reasons explained below…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · September 9, 2010 · in the opinion

    Kurns v. AW Chesterton Inc. (2010)

    …Myers, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant. W. Thomas McGough, Jr. (argued), Robert H. Owen, Reed Smith LLP, Pittsburgh, PA, for Appellee Railroad Friction Products Corporation. Daniel Markewich (argued), Ellen G. Margolis, Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass, New York…

  5. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 3, 2019 · in the opinion

    Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2019)

    …permissible to inform a jury that a co-defendant to the asbestos lawsuit had been dismissed when a remaining defendant "opens the door" by introducing evidence relating to the earlier presence of that now-dismissed party…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · October 19, 2014 · in the opinion

    Oneal v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2014)

    …a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute"). This Court likewise is persuaded that…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · April 12, 2017 · in the opinion

    Carroll v. Abb, Inc. (2017)

    …metal defense provides that "a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." Spychalla v…

  8. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Knight (2015)

    …support a recovery if the negligence of both be a contributing cause, even though one owes to the person injured a higher degree of care, and even though there be differing degrees of negligence by each…

  9. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · January 28, 2004 · in the opinion

    Psi Energy, Inc. v. Roberts (2004)

    …N.E.2d 637, 639 (Ind.1991) ("A landowner owes the highest duty to an invitee: a duty to exercise reasonable care for his protection while he is on the landowner's premises."), reh'g denied…

  10. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 3, 2017 · in the opinion

    Woo v. General Electric Company (2017)

    …Under Restatement (Second) of Torts § 388, a manufacturer owes a duty to warn of hazards for the use of a product that are or should be known to a manufacturer. Simonetta, 165 Wn.2d at 348. …

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 19, 2018 · in the opinion

    Melancon v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2018)

    …F.3d at 173). Remand is proper when defendants can show only that the government owns the relevant vessels and fails to produce evidence that the government distributed safety procedures regarding use of asbestos. See Bartel…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 2018 · in the opinion

    Wittman v. Coty, Inc. (2018)

    …that a particular exposure or series of exposures was a \legal cause' of his injury, i.e., a substantial factor in bringing about the injury." (Rutherford v. Owen-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 982…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 18, 2003 · in the opinion

    Kinsman v. Unocal Corp. (2003)

    …to protect themselves against it, and \[¶\] (c) fails to exercise reasonable care to protect them against the danger." Thus, a landowner owes a duty to invitees to exercise reasonable care in maintaining the premises. (§ 343; see […

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 21, 2016 · in the opinion

    Battistoni v. ITW Food Equipment Group (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2016)

    …washers, saws, choppers, and ovens (id.). Plaintiff further avers that the repairs included gasket removal and replacement of Hobart brand steamers, including brushing and sanding, as well as seal replacement on pipes and insulation thereon (id…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 11, 2015 · in the opinion

    Murat v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2015)

    …1987) 845 F.2d 536, 541.) A vessel owner owes three duties of care to a ship repair contractor, commonly referred to as the "\"turnover duty," dealing with the condition of the ship when the owner…

  16. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 8, 2012 · in the opinion

    Adler v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2012)

    …Specifically, he alleges exposure to asbestos-containing boilers, furnaces, pumps, valves, steam traps, baker ovens, gaskets, and other items. Mr. Wexler was diagnosed with lung cancer on May 12, 2011. He is currently sixty-eight years…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    Conner v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2012)

    …now holds that, under maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute.

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Kansas · November 20, 2018 · in the opinion

    Little v. Budd Company (2018)

    …4) an electron micrograph of a human bronchiole (Slide 4); (5) a depiction of the end of an airway which opens into a gas exchange area (Slide 5); (6) a depiction of the epithelial cells that…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2009 · in the opinion

    Short v. Sequoia Ventures, Inc. (2009)

    …and accepted" doctrine, under which a builder or designer of a real property improvement owes no duty to a third party injured by a patent defect after the owner accepts the completed improvement. (See Jones v…

  20. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 22, 2006 · in the opinion

    Hudson v. Delmarva Power & Light Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation Hudson Trial Group, 2006)

    …the control of any part of the work, is subject to liability for physical harm to others for whose safety the employer owes a duty to exercise reasonable care, which is caused by his failure to…