No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

736 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 27 of 37

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · May 27, 2016 · in the opinion

    Thurmon v. Georgia Pacific, LLC (2016)

    …component parts of its industrial valves. Both of these arguments fail. Georgia courts recognize a cause of action for injuries sustained on account of a manufacturer's negligent product design. See Ford Motor Co. v. Stubblefield…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 20, 2015 · in the opinion

    Neureuther v. Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC (2015)

    …gold standard for evaluating the reliability of expert testimony."). The Seventh Circuit's Opinion in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2000) provides the framework for analyzing Defendant's first argument…

  3. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion

    Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Minton (2013)

    …proceedings if he be so advised. \[1\] We have today rejected the substantial contributing factor analysis of proximate causation in cases tried under Virginia law when multiple sufficient causation is alleged. Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer…

  4. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · June 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2009)

    …86, 113 S.Ct. 2510, 125 L.Ed.2d 74 (1993). \[2\] Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wash.2d 522, 452 P.2d 729 (1969). \[3\] Seattle-First Nat'l Bank v. Tabert, 86 Wash…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 14, 2018 · in the opinion

    Rothlein v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …fact exist as to whether the JBP used by Mr. Rothlein was contaminated with asbestos and defective, or unsuited for its purpose (See Denny v. Ford Motor Co., 87 N.Y. 2d 248, 662 N.E…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · September 3, 2009 · in the opinion

    Fuller v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)

    …Duro Dyne Corp.; Essex Specialty Products, LLC; ExxonMobil Oil Corp.; Federal-Mogul Asbestos Personal Injury Trust as successor to Felt-Products Manufacturing Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Foster Wheeler Energy Corp.; Gardner Denver, Inc.; Gardner-Gibson, Inc.…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 18, 2015 · in the opinion

    Neureuther v. Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC (2015)

    …806 (7th Cir. 2013) (Daubert "remains the gold standard for evaluating the reliability of expert testimony."). The Seventh Circuit's Opinion in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2000) provides the…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · September 16, 2020 · in the opinion

    Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2020)

    …2018 WL 3819027, at [\16] (W.D. Wash. Aug. 10, 2018) (quoting Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1045 (Pa. 2016)). Nevertheless, as the court in Jack explained, "\[t\]hese \irrefutable scientific fact…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · February 10, 2015 · in the opinion

    Hendricks v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2015)

    …originally been filed in federal court. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a); see also Snow v. Ford Motor Co., 561 F.2d 787, 789 (9th Cir. 1977). As the removing party, Defendant bears the burden of…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 21, 2021 · in the opinion

    Benavidez v. Fluor Corp. (2021)

    …2) \legal cause.'" (Turley, at p. 979.) "\\[I\]f there has been no exposure, there is no causation.'" (Petitpas v. Ford Motor Co. (2017) 13 Cal.App.5th 261, 289; see Izell v. Union Carbide Corp…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 23, 2018 · in the opinion

    Williams v. the Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack OF California (2018)

    …which occurred "during the 1960's through the mid-1980's." \[17\] "A \shade tree mechanic' is someone who maintains and repairs his vehicles himself." (Adams v. Ford Motor Co. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 1475…

  12. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 3, 1996 · in the opinion

    Held v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (1996)

    …La.1990). This is true no matter how small the chances of the party opposing the motion to ultimately prevail appear to be. Dearie v. Ford Motor Co., 583 So.2d 28 (La. App. 5 Cir…

  13. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 15, 2019 · in the opinion

    Ament v. John Crane-Houdalille, Inc. (2019)

    …court not sustained objections to those questions below. The Aments further assert that "Dr. Frank's testimony and opinions were exactly what was permitted and approved in" Dixon v. Ford Motor Co., 433 Md. 137 (2013)…

  14. Court case · Maine Supreme Judicial Court · January 17, 1984 · in the opinion

    Austin v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. (1984)

    …second, that such assumption of the risk is a "form of contributory negligence." The first principle finds wide support in the authorities. See Henderson v. Ford Motor Co., 519 S.W.2d 87, 90 (Tex.1974)…

  15. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2012 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific v. Farrar (2012)

    …of other suppliers. Id. at 209 (footnote omitted). \[5\] We will briefly comment upon an additional matter. On June 29, 2012, this Court filed its opinion in Dixon v. Ford Motor Co., \_\_\_ Md. App. \_\_\_, No. 536…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · June 20, 2023 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Edward Orton, JR. Ceramic Foundation (2023)

    …5 Ill.2d 614, 126 N.E.2d 836, 840 (1955)). "A manufacturer has a nondelegable duty to design a reasonably safe product." Jablonski v. Ford Motor Co., 353 Ill.Dec. 327, 955 N.E.2d…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 1, 2021 · in the opinion

    Hulin v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2021)

    …testimony, fact or expert, to show that AmChem's asbestos products were a substantial factor in causing his lung cancer. Cf. Michel v. Ford Motor Co., No. 18-4738, 2019 WL 118007, at [\3] (E.D…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 31, 2009 · in the opinion

    Funk v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)

    …Inc.; Federal-Mogul Asbestos Personal Injury Trust as successor to Felt-Products Manufacturing Co.; Federal-Mogul Asbestos Personal Injury Trust as successor to the former Vellumoid Division of Federal-Mogul; Ford Motor Co.; Foseco, Inc.; Foster…

  19. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · October 15, 1987 · in the opinion

    Lockwood v. AC & S, Inc. (1987)

    …itself and the consumer's expectations. Davis, at 72. Thus, in Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wn.2d 208, 212-13, 683 P.2d 1097, 47 A.L.R.4th 609 (1984), we held that…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2013 · in the opinion

    Pfeifer v. John Crane, Inc. (2013)

    …of governmental safety regulations does not bar an award of punitive damages for egregious misconduct that they are ineffective in preventing. (Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co. (1981) 119 Cal.App.3d 757, 810 \[174 Cal.Rptr…