532 results for “General Electric”, page 27 of 27
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 19, 2018 · in the opinion
Vitale v. Burnham, LLC (2018)
…App. 438, 451 (2010) (citations and quotations omitted). "Mere general allegations of conclusory assertions will not suffice." Id. (citations omitted). Additionally, "a mere scintilla of evidence in support of the non-moving party's claim is…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · August 24, 2018 · in the opinion
Goodrich v. John Crane, Inc. (2018)
…not relevant evidence of the "state of the art." JCI argues that evidence of the Navy's knowledge is a "critical component" of the general knowledge and state of the art literature concerning asbestos health hazards…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Feuerman v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2014)
…All seven of the plaintiffs in proposed joint trial Group One are alleged to have been exposed, in general, to asbestos at commercial and residential job sites in and around the New York City area while…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · January 30, 2018 · in the opinion
MacCormack v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2018)
…App. Ct. 1987) (reasoning that a worsening of a condition did not justify a subsequent new action as "\[t\]he general rule is, of course, that a plaintiff is entitled to one recovery in a personal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 18, 2021 · in the opinion
Cox v. Foster Wheeler (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2021)
…6); 3) incorrectly interpreting "the narrow exception to maritime law's general rule that an equipment manufacturer is not liable for an injury caused by a third-party product used with its equipment" (id. at 7…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · October 28, 2011 · in the opinion
Howard v. AW Chesterton Co. (2011)
…articles in an attempt to support their claims that respirable fibers were present. However much of this information is irrelevant to this case in general and ACE specifically. The simple fact remains that \[Appellants'\] attempt to…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 17, 2009 · in the opinion
Clemmer v. Thorpe Insulation Company (2009)
…s and its trucks were present at the LBNS almost daily. Ay acknowledged that the federal government's General Services Administration (GSA) was the larger supplier; but Thorpe was the predominant supplier among the outside companies…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · September 9, 2010 · in the opinion
Kurns v. AW Chesterton Inc. (2010)
…of LIA preemption. In Napier, the Court held that "the power delegated to the \[Interstate Commerce\] Commission\[\[4\]\] by the Boiler Inspection Act as amended is a general one. It extends to the design, the construction…
-
Court case · Missouri Supreme Court · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion
Hegger v. Valley Farm Dairy Co. (2020)
…2012) (holding the term "injury" in the Act encompassed occupational diseases). The general assembly amended the workers' compensation law in 2013 to provide the exclusive remedy for occupational diseases caused by toxic exposure in the workplace…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · October 3, 2014 · in the opinion
May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)
…2d at 1369 ("\[t\]he rationale underpinning the general rule of strict liability is that it logically and fairly places the loss caused by a defective product on those who create the risk and reap the…
-
Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · October 29, 2019 · in the opinion
Davis v. John Crane, Inc. (2019)
…F.2d 1480, 1481 (11th Cir. 1985). This rule coincides with the general requirement that a plaintiff establish proximate causation as a necessary element of a tort claim. See id. at 610 (2), 548 S.E…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 29, 2016 · in the opinion
Rhodes v. McIC, Inc. (2016)
…Spartan Motors Chassis, Inc., 519 F.3d 192, 199 (4th Cir. 2008) (language in general removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a), "is deliberately parallel to the requirements for notice pleading found in Rule 8…