542 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 27 of 28
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 18, 2019 · in the opinion
ALBIN v. AJAX MAGNETHERMIC CORPORATION (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…using asbestos insulation. WILSON CHALCO: Deceased from Mesothelioma. Exposed from 1971-2006 from work as laborer and maintenance, and from working around others using asbestos containing products. Exposed to asbestos containing ovens, matrix boards, valves, pumps…
-
Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · August 26, 2020 · in the opinion
Golik v. CBS Corp. (2020)
…of premises owes to the servant of the independent contractor employed to perform work on his premises the duty to avoid endangering him by the owner's own negligence or affirmative act, but owes no duty…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 8, 2010 · in the opinion
Cashman v. Pacific Scientific Company (2010)
…2d at 248). While this appeal was pending, the Supreme Court held that a manufacturer owes no common law duty to warn of the hazards of asbestos insulation that it did not manufacture, sell, or supply…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · February 7, 2014 · in the opinion
Cabasug v. Crane Company (2014)
…third parties (often provided years later), and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in asbestos-containing replacement parts that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute. B. Maxim's Motion for Summary Judgment…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · April 13, 2005 · in the opinion
Flanders v. California Coastal Communities (2005)
…Holdings, Inc., are pitted against each other. Each denies that it owns the liabilities of M.W. Kellogg. The trial court concluded that the plaintiff had made a prima facie case of jurisdiction against California Coastal…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)
…e have no basis to conclude in this diversity case that the Tennessee Supreme Court would overrule its prior decisions holding that a manufacturer owes no duty of care to consumers of products made by others…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 2012 · in the opinion
Campbell v. Ford Motor Company (2012)
…harm. "A person that owns property is negligent if he or she fails to use reasonable care to keep the property in a reasonably safe condition. A person that owns property must use reasonable care to…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · May 8, 2015 · in the opinion
Abutahoun v. Dow Chemical Company (2015)
…Chapter 95. Instead, the chapter uses the phrase "property owner," which section 95.001(3) defines to mean "a person or entity that owns real property primarily used for commercial or business purposes." TEX. CIV. PRAC…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 18, 2011 · in the opinion
Fontes v. Interstate Brands Corporation (2011)
…days. As a maintenance man, Mr. Fontes removed and replaced steam line insulation twice a year on two ovens. According to Mr. Fontes, the insulation that was removed from the steam lines consisted of a grayish…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 7, 2022 · in the opinion
Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)
…corporate representative of Entergy New Orleans, Inc. ("Entergy"),\[20\] which owns and operates the Nine Mile Point plant. The deposition was taken as part of an asbestos case in Louisiana state court. In its reply memorandum…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 11, 2007 · in the opinion
Alcoa, Inc. v. Behringer (2007)
…Siegler, 899 S.W.2d 195, 197 (Tex.1995) ("The threshold inquiry in a negligence case is whether the defendant owes a legal duty to the plaintiff."). If there is no legal duty, liability for negligence…
-
Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · September 3, 2019 · in the opinion
Hinson v. Continental Tire the Americas (2019)
…were layered together and pressed in a tire-building machine..... The "green tires" were then transported to the curing department. There were 147 clam-shell-shaped curing presses/ovens in the curing department..... The curing process…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Georgia · December 27, 2013 · in the opinion
Cabasug v. Crane Company (2013)
…third parties (often provided years later), and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in asbestos-containing replacement parts that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute. B. Maxim's Motion for Summary Judgment…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · December 13, 2021 · in the opinion
Wright v. 3M Company (2021)
…landowner's premises. Id. The parties do not dispute Wright's status as an invitee. A landowner owes an invitee the duty of care set forth in the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343 (Am Law Inst.
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas · March 21, 2011 · in the opinion
In re Placid Oil Company (2011)
…that have been sued by the Post-Confirmation Tort Claimants. \[25\] Placid is now a subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum Corporation and remains an active corporation that owns oil and gas interests. See Defendants' Exhibit 1-C…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 10, 2015 · in the opinion
Jordan v. Thatcher Street, LLC (2015)
…06), 923 So.2d 627. A premises owner owes a duty to persons on its premises to exercise reasonable care for their safety and not expose them to unreasonable risks of injury or harm. Mundy v…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Christy v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…valves, generators, pumps, turbines, compressors, cranes, brakes, ovens, ladles, gloves and aprons. As a laborer installed wall board, used joint compound and worked with floor tiles. JOHN MARMARA: Living with lung cancer. Exposed from 1962-63…
-
Court case · Arizona Court of Appeals · April 17, 2012 · in the opinion
Pounders v. Enserch E & C, Inc. (2012)
…Beazer East, Inc., 219 Mich.App. 405, 557 N.W.2d 127, 132 (1996) (rejecting plaintiff's argument that entity that designed, manufactured, and installed coke ovens was a "supplier" for purposes of statute of repose).
-
Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 10, 2022 · in the opinion
Sinyard v. Georgia Power Company (2022)
…a \contractor' can be a statutory employer."). So, a company is not a statutory employer if it merely owns (or is in possession and control of) the premises where an employee is injured. Manning, 252 Ga…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2016 · in the opinion
Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2016)
…Jan. 12, 2015) (court order). \[12\] Owen v. Burlington N. Santa Fe R.R. Co., 153 Wash.2d 780, 787, 108 P.3d 1220 (2005). \[13\] Owen, 153 Wash.2d at 787, 108 P.3d 1220…