No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

2,276 results for “General Electric”, page 28 of 114

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Melendrez v. Superior Court OF State OF California (2013)

    …subd. (b).) The reason for this waiver should be obvious. As a general matter, when an individual verifies discovery responses, further discovery can be directed to that individual to determine the sources for the initial responses…

  2. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · July 3, 2008 · in the opinion

    Louden v. AW Chesterton Co. (2008)

    …Halter & Griswold, LLP, 1400 Keybank Center, 800 Superior Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44114-2688, for Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co., Attorneys for Appellee. BEFORE: Cooney, P.J., Dyke, J., and Celebrezze, J. JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION COLLEEN CONWAY…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 3, 2014 · in the opinion

    Friedman v. AO Smith Wter Prod. Co. (2014)

    …defendant Appleton Electric LLC ("Appleton") moves pursuant to CPLR 3212 for summary judgment dismissing all claims and cross-claims asserted against it on the ground that there is no evidence that plaintiff Stanley Friedman was exposed…

  4. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 3, 2010 · in the opinion

    Dean v. Bur. OF Workers'comp. (2010)

    …Columbus, OH 43215, Kevin Reis, Assistant Attorney General, 150 East Gay Street, 22nd Floor, Columbus, OH 43215, For: Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation; State Fund Employers, Muskingum Electric, Inc. & Ohio Ferro-Alloys Corp, for Defendants-Appellees…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 26, 2013 · in the opinion

    Friedman v. AO Smith Corp. (2013)

    …breakers, as well as specialty and explosion-proof equipment. Among other things, Mr. Friedman testified that he purchased electrical supplies and equipment from Graybar. In this regard, Mr. Friedman testified as follows (plaintiffs' exhibit B, pp…

  6. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · January 22, 2020 · in the opinion

    Nooyen v. Wisconsin Elec. Power Co. (2020)

    …by a structural defect, rather than an unsafe condition associated with the structure.\[5\] ¶17 Jacqueline contends this court previously held in Viola v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co., 2014 WI App 5, 352 Wis. 2d 541…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · March 13, 2012 · in the opinion

    Rabovsky v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2012)

    …the order of November 1, 2011, denied Pennsylvania Electric's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. As a general rule, a magistrate judge cannot "determine" a motion for judgment on the pleadings. See 28 U.S…

  8. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 30, 1999 · in the opinion

    White v. CBS Corp. (1999)

    …annexation" means a joinder or uniting of a chattel with realty for a specific purpose—here use of the turbines to generate electricity—coupled with the owner's intent to enhance the freehold by the improvement…

  9. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · March 28, 2018 · in the opinion

    Duffy v. CBS Corporation (2018)

    666 carried the force of law due to the General Assembly not having codified that section, whether Scribner's reasoning was applicable to the statute of repose, or whether the manufacturer exception contained in CJP § 5…

  10. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · May 23, 2014 · in the opinion

    Reera v. AO Smith Corp. (2014)

    …the employees of another subcontractor, New England Insulation, were working in the same general area at Mystic as Reera, installing and maintaining older boilers and high-pressure steam lines. Plaintiff also alleges that Reera was exposed…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 25, 2012 · in the opinion

    Rabovsky v. Goulds Pumps (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. VI), 2012)

    Brody's testimony to assist the jury's general understanding of mesothelioma in the same case. See Larson, 2010 WL 4676563 at [\3], n.3 (describing the Schumacher opinion). In Larson, Judge Robreno similarly upheld Magistrate…

  12. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 7, 2023 · in the opinion

    Dusto v. Rogers Corporation (2023)

    …179-80. In Connecticut, the legislature enacted workers' compensation legislation that included a broad exclusivity provision with no express exceptions for intentional torts of the employer. See General Statutes § 31-284 (a). The legislature also elected…

  13. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · October 11, 2024 · in the opinion

    Day v. 3M Company Inc. (2024)

    …(Dr. Kradin's CV at 1-2.) Additionally, Dr. Kradin has worked in several hospitals and currently serves as the Honorary Pathologist and Honorary Associate Physician at Massachusetts General Hospital. Id. at 2. He has authored…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · October 8, 2014 · in the opinion

    Stevens v. CBS Corp. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. V), 2014)

    …mesothelioma, an asbestos-related disease, after having been exposed to asbestos-containing products manufactured by defendants CBS Corporation (a successor by merger to Westinghouse Electric Corporation) and distributed by International Paper Co. ("IP").\[1\] Specifically, he…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · December 29, 2016 · in the opinion

    In re Asbestos Litigation Charlevoix v. CBS Corporation (2016)

    …2013, a copy of which is available on the court's website, http://www.ded.uscourts.gov. \[1\] CBS Corporation is sued as a successor-in-interest to Westinghouse Electric Corporation ("Westinghouse"). (D.1. 147 at…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Woolard v. Carrier Corporation (2020)

    …Mr. Woolard did not mention Foxboro at all during his deposition, and there is no indication that his general testimony covers instrument features specific to (and therefore capable of identifying) Foxboro products. A second fact witness…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · June 18, 2020 · in the opinion

    Kruse v. Actuant Corporation (2020)

    … 3.) After his military service, Mr. Jimenez was "honorably discharged as the civilian equivalent of a Certified Aircraft Electrical Mechanic and Technician." (Id.) Apart from his service, Mr. Jimenez also "performed both supervisorial and hands-on…

  18. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 17, 2010 · in the opinion

    Pichon v. Asbestos Defendants (2010)

    …the theory of successor liability for any damages resulting from Mr. Pichon's pre-1988 exposure to asbestos-containing products manufactured and/or sold by General Motors \["GM"\]? (2) Did the trial court err by determining…

  19. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 17, 2005 · in the opinion

    Rudy v. A-Best Products Company (2005)

    …INC., DURABLE MANUFACTURING, DURAMETALLIC CORPORATION, ELSA BENSON, FABRI-VALVE, DIVISION OF ITT GRINNELL VALVE COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION, GAGE COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC., GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY, GILBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC., GOODYEAR, GPU, INC., GPU NUCLEAR, INC., GPU SERVICE…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · May 2, 2018 · in the opinion

    Ahnert v. Employers Ins. Co. of Wausau (2018)

    …or the distance that Daniel Ahnert worked from any asbestos. He characterized his "general" report as a "review of the industrial hygiene literature as it relates to asbestos"—"kind of a rundown of asbestos information. Id…