No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

736 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 29 of 37

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas · September 25, 2006 · in the opinion

    Jacobs v. Tapscott (2006)

    …disclosures is just that—to supplement. Such disclosures are not intended to provide an extension of the expert designation and report production deadline." Metro Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 145 F.3d 320…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · February 12, 2018 · in the opinion

    Barabin v. Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. (2018)

    …the "single fiber" theory, and the "each and every exposure" theory. See, e.g., Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F.Supp.3d 841, 846 (E.D.N.C. 2015). \[12\] Ms. Barabin takes issue with…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · January 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Erhardt v. Bmw OF North America, LLC (2021)

    …BMW NA Mem. Frank & Zhang at 18-20 (collecting cases); see, e.g., Anderson v. Ford Motor Co., 950 F. Supp. 2d 1217, 1225 (D. Utah 2013) (noting that "a growing number of courts have determined…

  4. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 31, 1992 · in the opinion

    Keene Corp. v. Gardner (1992)

    …721 S.W.2d 832, 834 (Tex. 1986); Lucas, 696 S.W.2d at 377; Ford Motor Co. v. Durrill, 714 S.W.2d 329, 337 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1986), vacated and remanded for rendition…

  5. Court case · Alabama Supreme Court · December 13, 2002 · in the opinion

    Southern Bakeries, Inc. v. Knipp (2002)

    …1971), quoted in Boswell v. Liberty Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 643 So.2d at 581; Ford Motor Co. v. Rice, 726 So.2d 626, 627 (Ala.1998).\[6\] Alabama has long required a manifest, present…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · September 5, 2018 · in the opinion

    Alexander v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2018)

    …S. 592-94. After considering these factors, courts are granted a "broad attitude" to determine admissibility. Clay v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 663, 667 (6th Cir. 2000). Admissibility does not require a perfect methodology…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 16, 2018 · in the opinion

    Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)

    …20] (E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2014), on reconsideration on other grounds sub nom. Yates v. Ford Motor Co., No. 5:12-CV-752-FL, 2015 WL 9222834 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 17, 2015)…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 13, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)

    …the argument that plaintiff's disease "cannot be caused by a certain type of asbestos" and that this defense can be considered by the jury when determining causation); Michel v. Ford Motor Co., No. 18-4738…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 17, 2016 · in the opinion

    Kordestani v. ExxonMOBIL Oil Corporation (2016)

    …408, 421 \[generally, state has no legitimate interest in imposing punitive damages for out-of-state conduct\]; Aguirre Cruz v. Ford Motor Co. (W.D. Tenn. 2006) 435 F.Supp.2d 701, 705-706 \[collecting cases…

  10. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · May 9, 2006 · in the opinion

    In re Asbestos Litigation (2006)

    …Minner, 791 A.2d at 848 (the trial court does not choose between competing reliable opinions, nor is it empowered to determine which theory is stronger). \[216\] See e.g. Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, 119…

  11. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 18, 2012 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Synatzske (2012)

    …evidentiary findings of the MDL pre-trial court, because they are reasonable and supported by the evidence. See Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co., 84 S.W.3d 198, 211 (Tex. 2002) (trial court does not abuse…

  12. Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · January 19, 1994 · in the opinion

    Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)

    …565-66 (1992) ("\[I\]t seems highly illogical and unfair for courts to determine at what point punitive damage awards should cease."); Wangen v. Ford Motor Co., 97 Wis.2d 260, 294 N.W.2d 437…

  13. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bryant v. General Motors Corp. (2015)

    …husband contracted and died from an occupational disease as a result of an injurious exposure to asbestos in the course of and arising out of his employment. See Snyder v. Ford Motor Co., 3d Dist. No…

  14. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 9, 2019 · in the opinion

    Shaffer v. AW Chesterton Co. (2019)

    …¶ 10, quoting Hal Artz Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., Lincoln-Mercury Div., 28 Ohio St.3d 20, 502 N.E.2d 590 (1986), paragraph one of the syllabus. {¶19} In response to U.S…

  15. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 2017 · in the opinion

    Poage v. Crane Co. (2017)

    …a design defect when, "a design is itself inadequate, rendering the product unreasonably dangerous without regard to whether a warning is given\[.\]" Moore v. Ford Motor Co., 332 S.W.3d 749, 757 (Mo. banc 2011)…

  16. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · June 7, 2011 · in the opinion

    Davis v. Crane Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2011)

    …Ford Motor Co., 2010 WL 3005539 (Del. Super. July 30, 2010), which held that Ford was not entitled to summary judgment under Pennsylvania law on a failure-to-warn claim where there were genuine factual disputes…

  17. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · June 27, 1997 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Wommack (1997)

    …manner. See Bagley v. CSX Transp., 219 Ga.App. 544, 545(1), 465 S.E.2d 706 (1995); Ford Motor Co. v. Stubblefield, 171 Ga.App. 331, 335-336(2), 319 S.E.2d 470 (1984)…

  18. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · April 26, 1999 · in the opinion

    Holmes v. ACandS, Inc. (1999)

    …that if the underlying claim is barred, any claim that might have been maintained by the personal representative is also barred." Brief of Appellants at 18. In Grimm v. Ford Motor Co., 157 Mich. App. 633…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Oregon · December 28, 2023 · in the opinion

    Chatfield v. Brenntag North America, Inc. (2023)

    …under Oregon law, the seller of a defective product may be sued in tort for products liability. Pl. Mot. 11 (citing Heaton v. Ford Motor Co., 248 Or. 467, 470, 435 P.2d 806, 808 (1967…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Washington · September 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Strong v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2021)

    …because the district court has a statutory duty to order a competency hearing where a criminal defendant's mental disease makes him unable to assist properly in his defense) with Kline v. Ford Motor Co., Inc.…