2,276 results for “General Electric”, page 29 of 114
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · August 28, 2024 · in the opinion
Day v. 3M Company Inc. (2024)
…Court with two motions to decide. The remaining defendants are: (1) Ford Motor Company (hereinafter Ford), see Ford's Summ. J. Mem. and (2) Graybar Electric Company, Inc. (hereinafter Graybar), see Graybar's Summ. J. Mem…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · October 31, 2014 · in the opinion
Netzer v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014)
…without subpoena by defendants";\[8\] — May 26, 2014: Netzer to "name \most likely to use' general product identification fact witnesses from the original fact witness list who have previously been deposed";\[9\] — June 9, 2014: "Last…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 22, 2024 · in the opinion
Matherne v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2024)
…a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation ("Westinghouse"). (Rec. Doc. 217). This motion was opposed by Huntington Ingalls Incorporated ("Avondale…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · December 22, 2015 · in the opinion
Brezonick v. AW Chesteron Company (2015)
…to be pasteurized. A lot of them had to be changed. Just general maintenance of the whole machine. Repacking required John to remove old gaskets and rope packing from valves, clean the valves, fit new gaskets…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 3, 1997 · in the opinion
Anchor Packing Co. v. Grimshaw (1997)
…3\] (Emphasis added). In addition, the legislative history of C.J. § 11-108 indicates that the General Assembly intended that the cap apply broadly, as opposed to only malpractice claims. In January 1986, Senate Bill No…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)
…other defendants after May 19, 1979. But applicable law imposes on plaintiff the burden of proving exposure to each particular defendant's products, not just proving exposure to asbestos in general. See, e.g., Hoffman v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · May 27, 2002 · in the opinion
Madden v. Able Supply Co. (2002)
…GAF Corporation, defendants. [\698] Franklin A Poff, Jr, Crisp Boyd et al, Texarkana, TX, for General Refractories Co., defendant. David Jonathan Fisher, Fairchild Price et al, Center, TX, for JT thorpe Co., defendant. Gregory Michael Sullivan…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · March 23, 2011 · in the opinion
Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Saville (2011)
…money must be used to pay claims, that general liability under the Joint Tort-feasors Act is established by the fact of the creation of the Trust and payment of settlement. We disagree. Under the Act…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 26, 2012 · in the opinion
Bankhead v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2012)
…Baker & McKenzie (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1128, 1137-1138.) We give only a general summary of the facts relating to liability and compensatory damages, because the details are not germane to the issues presented by…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)
…this work, on its own, leaves only the general possibility that Covil insulation was likewise present. Plaintiffs next argue that Mr. Vinson worked in close proximity to Covil employees who were installing or maintaining insulation. The…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…the insulation at the RJ Reynolds plant," he answered that he did not "recall exactly who was working" and testified only that Daniel employees were general contractors who "did all kind of different jobs." (ECF No…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 24, 2021 · in the opinion
Barrosse v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2021)
…of North America, wherein the Court noted the "general rule" that, "injuries sustained by employees when going to or returning from their regular place of work are not deemed to arise out of and in the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 5, 2016 · in the opinion
Evans v. Foster Wheeler Energy, Corporation (2016)
…U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1). (D.I. 1) Defendants CBS Corporation, f/k/a/ Westinghouse Electric Corporation\[1\] ("Westinghouse"), and Crane Co. ("Crane") joined in Foster Wheeler's Notice of Removal. (D.I. 4; D…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 20, 2002 · in the opinion
Gutteridge v. AP Green Services, Inc. (2002)
…2d 1071 (2001). ¶ 28 Pennsylvania law imposes no general duty on property owners to prepare and maintain a safe building for the benefit of a contractor's employees who are working on that building. Mentzer v…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 15, 2015 · in the opinion
Soto v. BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. (2015)
…pain and suffering of the decedent, which is not recoverable as a general rule." The court nonetheless permitted Gabriel to testify about "\[h\]elping out Grandpa towards the end," including giving him morphine, changing his diapers…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 12, 2003 · in the opinion
Breaux v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2003)
…Inc.; Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc.; Hopeman Brothers, Inc.; and Western Electric Corporation (now Viacom, Inc.) for damages allegedly sustained as a result of Mr. Breaux's exposure to asbestos. Plaintiffs allege their damages, including Mr. Breaux's…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 8, 2018 · in the opinion
Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)
…526 (N.D. Cal. 2009) ("A general concern over litigation does not trigger a duty to preserve evidence."). Ms. Finch has not shown that Pfizer reasonably should have known that the pre-1978 records may have…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 4, 2013
Wilson v. 3M Company (2013)
…a jury must decide, so summary judgment cannot be granted on a motion where the court would have to weigh the testimony. Product Identification; Trial Procedure and Discovery electrician installing fire alarms, switches, and other fire…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 30, 2013
Burns v. Bechtel Corp. (2013)
…a roving maintenance employee at Potomac Electric Power Company (PEPCO) power stations. He was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2009, and he and his wife Jean sued Bechtel, PEPCO's general contractor on construction projects at the…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 4, 2008
Nostrom v. Chesterton (2008)
…Nostrom plaintiffs' Labor Law 241(6) claims against it. In this Department, the general air-contaminant regulations in section 12 of the Industrial Code do not support Labor Law 241(6) liability. Even if they applied…