No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

48 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 3 of 3

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    Crowe v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2019)

    …LHWCA. In P.C. Pfeiffer, the Court determined that Ford, an employee who fastened military vehicles to flat railroad cars for further inland transportation after the vehicles had been unloaded from ships, was engaged in maritime…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Arbogast v. Georgia-Pacific LLC (2017)

    …The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Theodore F. Roberts, Venable LLP & M. Elizabeth O'Neill, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE LLP, pro hac vice. Georgia-Pacific, LLC, Cross Defendant, represented by F. Ford Loker…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 18, 2016 · in the opinion

    Oliver v. Campbell McCORMICK, Inc. (2016)

    …Pump, ThirdParty Defendant, represented by F. Ford Loker, Jr., Miles and Stockbridge PC. Crane Co., ThirdParty Defendant, represented by Neil Joseph MacDonald, MacDonald Law Group, LLC. General Electric Company, ThirdParty Defendant, represented by David J. Quigg…

  4. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · October 18, 1995 · in the opinion

    ACandS, Inc. v. Godwin (1995)

    …L. Martin, Gardner M. Duvall, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLP, Baltimore \[Attorneys for Porter Hayden Company\]), all on brief. B. Ford Davis (Whiteford, Taylor & Preston L.L.P., Baltimore, all on brief), William D. Harvard, Warren N…

  5. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 3, 2019 · in the opinion

    Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2019)

    …is relevant. State v. Robertson, No. 40, slip op. at 8 (Md. Apr. 2, 2019); see also Ford v. State, 462 Md. 3, 46, 197 A.3d 1090, 1115 (2018), reconsideration denied (Dec. 11, 2018). In…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · December 14, 2004 · in the opinion

    Rourke v. Amchem Products, Inc. (2004)

    …and holdings in these §1738 cases are entirely consistent with the pronouncements of the Supreme Court in Constitutional full faith and credit cases. See, for example, Ford v. Ford, 371 U.S. 187, 192, 83 S…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · April 29, 2019 · in the opinion

    Sawyer v. Union Carbide Corporation (2019)

    …Moskowitz Edelman and Dicker. SB Decking Inc., Cross Claimant, represented by F. Ford Loker, Jr., Miles and Stockbridge PC & Joshua Franklin Kahn, Miles & Stockbridge P.C. General Electric Company, Cross Claimant, represented by Donald S. Meringer…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 22, 2021 · in the opinion

    Staubs v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2021)

    …103 Harv. L. Rev. 1989, 1989-97 (1990)). Maryland follows the separate disease rule in toxic exposure cases. See Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Ford, 204 Md. App. 1, 268 (2012) (Eyler, D., J., concurring in part…