No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

83 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 3 of 5

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 31, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bell v. Abb Group, Inc. (2015)

    …806 (7th Cir. 2013) (Daubert "remains the gold standard for evaluating the reliability of expert testimony."). The Seventh Circuit's Opinion in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2000) provides the…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 20, 2015 · in the opinion

    Neureuther v. Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC (2015)

    …gold standard for evaluating the reliability of expert testimony."). The Seventh Circuit's Opinion in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2000) provides the framework for analyzing Defendant's first argument…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 18, 2015 · in the opinion

    Neureuther v. Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC (2015)

    …806 (7th Cir. 2013) (Daubert "remains the gold standard for evaluating the reliability of expert testimony."). The Seventh Circuit's Opinion in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2000) provides the…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 21, 2021 · in the opinion

    Benavidez v. Fluor Corp. (2021)

    …2) \legal cause.'" (Turley, at p. 979.) "\\[I\]f there has been no exposure, there is no causation.'" (Petitpas v. Ford Motor Co. (2017) 13 Cal.App.5th 261, 289; see Izell v. Union Carbide Corp…

  5. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · October 15, 1987 · in the opinion

    Lockwood v. AC & S, Inc. (1987)

    …itself and the consumer's expectations. Davis, at 72. Thus, in Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wn.2d 208, 212-13, 683 P.2d 1097, 47 A.L.R.4th 609 (1984), we held that…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    MacCormack v. the Adel Wiggins Group (2017)

    …that under some circumstances even in the case of default, where a party actively participated in the litigation previously, collateral estoppel would apply); see also Ellis v. Ford Motor Co., 628 F. Supp. 849, 857 (D…

  7. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion

    Kiser v. AW Chesterton Co. (2013)

    …original asbestosis suit. Given our current state of medical knowledge, however, it is not even possible to determine with certainty which disease stemmed from what asbestos exposure(s). See Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer, 285 Va. \…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · August 17, 1998 · in the opinion

    Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1998)

    …we are not persuaded that reversible error has been demonstrated or that manifest injustice would result by allowing the verdict to stand. See Johnson v. Ford Motor Co., 988 F.2d 573, 582 (5th Cir.1993)…

  9. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 18, 2012 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Synatzske (2012)

    …evidentiary findings of the MDL pre-trial court, because they are reasonable and supported by the evidence. See Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co., 84 S.W.3d 198, 211 (Tex. 2002) (trial court does not abuse…

  10. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bryant v. General Motors Corp. (2015)

    …husband contracted and died from an occupational disease as a result of an injurious exposure to asbestos in the course of and arising out of his employment. See Snyder v. Ford Motor Co., 3d Dist. No…

  11. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · June 27, 1997 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Wommack (1997)

    …manner. See Bagley v. CSX Transp., 219 Ga.App. 544, 545(1), 465 S.E.2d 706 (1995); Ford Motor Co. v. Stubblefield, 171 Ga.App. 331, 335-336(2), 319 S.E.2d 470 (1984)…

  12. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · December 10, 2015 · in the opinion

    Segroves v. Union Carbide (2015)

    …Woods, 777 S.W.2d 347, 349 (Tenn. 1989)). It is a "rule of rest," Moulton v. Ford Motor Co., 533 S.W.2d 295, 296 (Tenn. 1976), and it promotes finality in litigation, prevents inconsistent…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of the Virgin Islands · September 27, 1991 · in the opinion

    Dunn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass (1991)

    …See also Tunis Bros. Co. v. Ford Motor Co., 124 F.R.D. 95, 97-98 (E.D.Pa.1989) (failure to list witness justified excluding witness). EVIDENTIARY QUESTIONS Defendant argues that this court erred in…

  14. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 28, 2012 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corp. v. Synatzske (2012)

    …because they are reasonable and supported by the evidence. See Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co., 84 S.W.3d 198, 211 (Tex.2002) (trial court does not abuse its discretion if some evidence of substantive and…

  15. Medical study · Medical research · 2004

    RE: Asbestos in brakes: exposure and risk of disease

    …cannot be defended. The letter discloses that the author has served as an expert witness in friction brake litigation, with the author's employer receiving funding for this work from Ford, General Motors and Daimler Chrysler.

  16. Medical study · Medical research · 1984

    The influence of amosite asbestos exposure on lung permeability

    This animal experiment tested whether amosite asbestos changes the barrier between blood and air in the lung. Young adult guinea pigs were given 25 mg of ground amosite in saline into the windpipe. Control animals received saline alone or sham…

  17. Medical study · Medical research · 1992

    Serum oncoproteins and growth factors in asbestosis and silicosis patients

    This case-referent study drew on patients with compensated asbestosis or silicosis followed at the Institute of Occupational Health in Finland. The authors tested 91 stored serum samples, taken between March 1983 and August 1987, from 46 patients…

  18. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 25, 2005 · in the opinion

    Summers v. Certainteed Corp. (2005)

    ¶ 10 FORD ELLIOTT, BENDER and BOWES, JJ., join. \[\\] Judge Joyce recused from participation. \[1\] Frederick Summers' wife, Lynn Summers, is also a plaintiff in a loss of consortium claim. For convenience, Frederick S. Summers and Richard…

  19. Court case · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · August 13, 1982 · in the opinion

    Gill v. Pacor, Inc. (1982)

    …acts of another: Restatement (Second) of Torts, §§ 442A, 442B. See also, Ford v. Jeffries, 474 Pa. 588, 379 A. 2d 111 (1977). In the matter sub judice, the jury specifically found that Johns-Manville was a…

  20. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · September 7, 1983 · in the opinion

    Pierce v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1983)

    …JJ. John T. Enoch and John Amato, IV, with whom were Goodman, Meagher & Enoch on the brief, for appellants. F. Ford Loker, with whom were Robert E. Scott, Jr., Daniel W. Whitney and Semmes, Bowen & Semmes…