No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

96 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 3 of 5

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · March 29, 2016 · in the opinion

    Dugas v. 3M Company (2016)

    …of products liability" it is unsettled whether the consumer-expectation test, risk-utility test or both should be applied in evaluating an alleged defect. Force v. Ford Motor Co., 879 So. 2d 103, 106-07 (Fla…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · February 28, 2014 · in the opinion

    Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2014)

    …v. A-C Prods. Liab. Trust, 424 F.3d 488, 492-93 (6th Cir. 2005); Smith v. Ford Motor Co., No. 2:08-cv-630, 2013 WL 214378, at [\1]-3 (D. Utah Jan. 18, 2014)…

  3. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Coogan v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc. (2020)

    …We agree with the Coogans. a. Legal Principles In Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., the Supreme Court adopted the rule of strict liability for product manufacturers stated in § 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (Am…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 16, 2011 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Salmon Bay and Gravel Co. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2011)

    …Schiff, 602 F.3d 152, 172 (3d Cir. April 7, 2010) (quoting Pineda v. Ford Motor Co., 502 F.3d 237, 243-44 (3d Cir. 2008)). Defendant has not challenged the qualification of Plaintiffs' experts, so…

  5. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 31, 1990 · in the opinion

    Celotex Corp. v. Tate (1990)

    …Manufacturing Company products.\[1\] When considering a "no evidence," "insufficient evidence," or "against the great weight and preponderance" point of error, we will follow the well-established test set forth in Pool v. Ford Motor Co…

  6. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 9, 2017 · in the opinion

    Startley v. Welco Mfg. Co. (2017)

    …Appeals recently decided a case in which a brake worker had inhaled asbestos dust from installing the brake products of six different manufacturers. Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co., 91 S.W.3d 387, 393 (Tex.App…

  7. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 1, 1988 · in the opinion

    H & H Plumbing Co. v. Indus. Comm'n (1988)

    …(1976), 39 Ill. App.3d 59, 65-66, 349 N.E.2d 616, 621; see Pearson v. Ford Motor Co. (1975), 32 Ill. App.3d 188, 191, 336 N.E. 2d 528, 530.) In the case…

  8. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · July 11, 2014 · in the opinion

    Bostic v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. (2014)

    …1965). \[44\] RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF TORTS: LIABILITY FOR PHYSICAL AND EMOTIONAL HARM § 26 (2010). \[45\] See id. § 26 cmt. j. \[46\] 232 S.W.3d at 772. \[47\] Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer, 285 Va. 141…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 31, 1982 · in the opinion

    Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd. (1982)

    …paying compensatory damages rather than changing the business practice which would result in extra costs. See, e.g., Wangen v. Ford Motor Co., 97 Wis.2d 260, 294 N.W.2d 437, 451-457 (1980); Sturm…

  10. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 10, 2024 · in the opinion

    Fisher v. American International Industries (2024)

    …containing product was sufficiently \frequent, regular and proximate' to support a jury's finding that \[the\] defendant's product was substantially causative of the disease." Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1044 (Pa…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 6, 2017 · in the opinion

    Bell v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2017)

    …to say, in the realm of asbestos exposure, the percentages alone simply do not bear out specific causation testimony one way or the other. See Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F. Supp. 3d 841, 847…

  12. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    Schrader v. Ameron International Corporation (2020)

    …Ford Motor Co., 160 A.3d 1135 (Del. 2017) (unpublished disposition at 2017 WL 1422626 [\3]). In Walls, the decedent was exposed to asbestos from, among other sources, brake changes performed on Ford vehicles in the…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    Merrill v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2009)

    …which makes them better able to insure that the component is suitable for their specific applications. (Springmeyer v. Ford Motor Co. (1998) 60 Cal.App.4th 1541, 1554 \[71 Cal.Rptr.2d 190\].) Liability of a…

  14. Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 15, 2018 · in the opinion

    DeLisle v. Crane Co. (2018)

    …exposed to asbestos-containing products from the following nonparty defendants: Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC; A.W. Chesterton Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Honeywell International, Inc., f/k/a Allied Signal, as successor in interest to Allied Corp.…

  15. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 5, 2014 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Airco Welders Supply (2014)

    …Engineering, Ford Motor Co., Foseco, Inc., Foster Wheeler Corporation, Garlock, Inc., General Electric Company, General Motors Corp., George V. Hamilton, Inc., Georgia- Pacific Corporation, Gould Pumps, Inc., Green, Tweed & Company, Inc., Hajoca Plumbing Supply Company, Harnischfeger…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)

    …(2008) 159 Cal.App.4th 655, 690-691.) As our Supreme Court stated in Johnson v. Ford Motor Co. (2005) 35 Cal.4th 1191, "\[t\]o consider the defendant's entire course of conduct in setting…

  17. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 26, 2016 · in the opinion

    Schwartz v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc. (2016)

    …Cleveland, OH, for Ford Motor Co. General Electric Corporation, CT Corporation Systems, Cleveland, OH, for General Electric Corporation. Genuine Parts Company c/o Grant Norris SA, Columbus, OH, for Genuine Parts Company. Pneumo Abex Corp. Successor…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Phillips v. Honeywell International Inc. (2017)

    …s determination of undue prejudice is subject to review under the abuse of discretion standard. (Donlen v. Ford Motor Co. (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 138, 147.) When weighing probative value against the danger of prejudice…

  19. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · September 16, 2024 · in the opinion

    Sorrentino v. Ammco Tools, Inc. (2024)

    …Law Ins. 1965). Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wn.2d 208, 211, 683 P.2d 1097 (1984). Under those principles: (1) One who sells any product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Mata v. Liberty Utilities (park Water) Corp. (2020)

    …Ford Motor Co. (1982) 32 Cal.3d 388, 402, a former Ford engineer and manager testified that Ford knew of the problem with the brakes on its Continental models because Ford had received customer and dealer…