No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

90 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 3 of 5

  1. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · March 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    Mason v. Mt. St. Joseph, Inc. (2009)

    …474, 155 P.3d 52 (2007); Simonsen v. Ford Motor Co., 196 Or.App. 460, 102 P.3d 710 (2004) (liberal construction of operative pleading in assessing sufficiency of claims under applicable statute of limitations). In…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 16, 2011 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Salmon Bay and Gravel Co. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2011)

    …Schiff, 602 F.3d 152, 172 (3d Cir. April 7, 2010) (quoting Pineda v. Ford Motor Co., 502 F.3d 237, 243-44 (3d Cir. 2008)). Defendant has not challenged the qualification of Plaintiffs' experts, so…

  3. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 31, 1990 · in the opinion

    Celotex Corp. v. Tate (1990)

    …Manufacturing Company products.\[1\] When considering a "no evidence," "insufficient evidence," or "against the great weight and preponderance" point of error, we will follow the well-established test set forth in Pool v. Ford Motor Co…

  4. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · November 10, 2008 · in the opinion

    Kimball v. Asbestos Corporation Ltd. (2008)

    …her\] product, and (b) the user or consumer has not bought the product from or entered into any contractual relation with the seller. \[16\] See Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wn.2d 522, 532, 452…

  5. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 10, 2024 · in the opinion

    Fisher v. American International Industries (2024)

    …containing product was sufficiently \frequent, regular and proximate' to support a jury's finding that \[the\] defendant's product was substantially causative of the disease." Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1044 (Pa…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 6, 2017 · in the opinion

    Bell v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2017)

    …to say, in the realm of asbestos exposure, the percentages alone simply do not bear out specific causation testimony one way or the other. See Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F. Supp. 3d 841, 847…

  7. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · June 19, 2012 · in the opinion

    Wagner v. Bondex International, Inc. (2012)

    …Montgomery, 331 S.W.3d at 335. "Whether the plaintiff made a submissible case is a question of law subject to de novo review." Moore v. Ford Motor Co., 332 S.W.3d 749, 756 (Mo…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 29, 1990 · in the opinion

    Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos (1990)

    …s verdicts if at all possible. See Wagner v. International Harvester Co., 611 F.2d 224 (8th Cir.1979); Hasson v. Ford Motor Co., 19 Cal.3d 530, 138 Cal. Rptr. 705, 564 P.2d 857 …

  9. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · June 28, 2016 · in the opinion

    Mtr OF Nyc Asbestos Litig. (2016)

    …v Frank Hrubetz & Co., 261 Md 141, 146-149, 274 A2d 107, 110-112 \[1971\]; Tibbetts v Ford Motor Co., 4 Mass App Ct 738, 741, 358 NE2d 460, 461-462 \[1976\]; see also Restatement \[Third…

  10. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002 · in the opinion

    Crane, Inc. v. Scribner (2002)

    …2d at 996. In adopting 1990 as the critical date when the cause of action arose, the court, though supposedly applying Grimshaw, essentially applied the manifestation test. In Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, 119 Md. App…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 27, 2009 · in the opinion

    Mahoney v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2009)

    …supra, 33 Cal.4th at pp. 795-796; Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co. (1981) 119 Cal.App.3d 757, 798-799.) Generally, it is improper for counsel to argue facts outside the evidence, or to engage…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · August 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Paroni EX rel. Estate OF Paroni v. General Electric UK Holdings Ltd. (2021)

    …474-75). To satisfy this minimum-contacts inquiry, the Court "recogniz\[es\] two kinds of personal jurisdiction: general (sometimes called all-purpose) jurisdiction and specific (sometimes called case-linked) jurisdiction." Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Campbell v. American Standard, Inc. (2009)

    …suitable place for the action, the court must consider a variety of factors, including whether the defendants are amenable to personal jurisdiction in the alternative forum. (Ford Motor Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America (1995…

  14. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 1, 1999 · in the opinion

    Owens Corning v. Bauman (1999)

    …the result is that Grimshaw and Abate are inconsistent and we, accordingly, should reject our holding construing the meaning of "arises" in Grimshaw. Owens Corning also contends that Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, 119 Md.App…

  15. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Daniels v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2019)

    …App. 3d 26, 37, 342 Ill.Dec. 678, 932 N.E.2d 1139 (2010), and Jablonski v. Ford Motor Co., 398 Ill. App. 3d 222, 271, 337 Ill.Dec. 788, 923 N.E.2d 347 (2010…

  16. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · June 7, 2011 · in the opinion

    Nye v. Bayer Cropscience, Inc. (2011)

    …S.W.3d 429, 452-53 (Tenn.Ct.App.2000); Harden v. Danek Med., Inc., 985 S.W.2d 449, 451 (Tenn.Ct.App.1998). North Brothers, relying on Ford Motor Co. v. Wagoner, 183 Tenn.

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 6, 2021 · in the opinion

    Settlemyer v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2021)

    …gatekeeping function, a trial court must "ensure that an expert's testimony both rests on a reliable foundation and is relevant to the task at hand." Nease v. Ford Motor Co., 848 F.3d 219, 229…

  18. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 26, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Stephens (2007)

    …of Appeals recently decided a case in which a brake worker had inhaled asbestos dust from installing the brake products of six different manufacturers. Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co., 91 S.W.3d 387, 393 (Tex…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion

    Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)

    …but they may be established by circumstantial evidence, in accordance with ordinary standards of proof. Romo v. Ford Motor Co., 99 Cal.App.4th 1115, 1141 (2002) ("It is difficult to imagine how corporate malice could…

  20. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 13, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Stephens (2007)

    …Appeals recently decided a case in which a brake worker had inhaled asbestos dust from installing the brake products of six different manufacturers. Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co., 91 S.W.3d 387, 393 (Tex.App…