107 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 3 of 6
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · September 28, 2011 · in the opinion
Vickroy v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2011)
…Corp.; Chrysler, LLC; Econolite Traffic Engineering & Maintenance, Inc.; Flexo Supply Co., d/b/a Stovey Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Foster Wheeler Energy Corp.; Garlock, Inc.; Genuine Parts Co.; Georgia Pacific Corp.; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.; Honeywell…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · December 11, 2008 · in the opinion
Braaten v. Saberhagen Holdings (2008)
…in Simonetta, common law product liability claims like those here\[4\] are governed by the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A (1965),\[5\] adopted in Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wash.2d 522, 531-32, 452…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996 · in the opinion
Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)
…in light of the evidence before it. (Ford Motor Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America (1995) 35 Cal. App.4th 604, 610 \[41 Cal. Rptr.2d 342\] (Ford).) Therefore, OC bore the burden of proving…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion
Faddish v. Buffalo Pumps (2012)
…distribution is that " \[t\]hey are an integral part of the overall producing and marketing enterprise that should bear the cost of injuries resulting from defective products." Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co., 61 Cal.2d 256…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 25, 2009 · in the opinion
Merrill v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2009)
…which makes them better able to insure that the component is suitable for their specific applications. (Springmeyer v. Ford Motor Co. (1998) 60 Cal.App.4th 1541, 1554 \[71 Cal.Rptr.2d 190\].) Liability of a…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 20, 2018 · in the opinion
Clayton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2018)
…b)(2); Heliotrope Gen., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 189 F.3d 971, 981 n.18 (9th Cir. 1999). A Rule 12(c) motion challenges the sufficiency of the opposing party's pleadings, and the court…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · September 11, 2017 · in the opinion
MacCormack v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2017)
…that under some circumstances even in the case of default, where a party actively participated in the litigation previously, collateral estoppel would apply); see also Ellis v. Ford Motor Co., 628 F. Supp. 849, 857 (D…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · September 25, 2019 · in the opinion
Kraus v. Alcatel-Lucent (2019)
…SYSTEMS/LORAL, Cross Claimant, represented by MICHAEL DAVID SMITH, GLAZIER YEE LLP & WILLIAM R. ADAMS, DICKIE MCCAMEY & CHILCOTE. FORD MOTOR CO., Cross Claimant, represented by DANIEL J. SINCLAIR, ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC & ERIC L. HORNE…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · December 18, 2015 · in the opinion
May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2015)
…strict liability analysis. Common sense tells us that the pumps were what Respondents sold to the Navy, and the gaskets and packing are included within that product. We have studied Ford Motor Co. v. Wood and…
-
Court case · New York Court of Appeals · June 28, 2016 · in the opinion
Mtr OF Nyc Asbestos Litig. (2016)
…v Frank Hrubetz & Co., 261 Md 141, 146-149, 274 A2d 107, 110-112 \[1971\]; Tibbetts v Ford Motor Co., 4 Mass App Ct 738, 741, 358 NE2d 460, 461-462 \[1976\]; see also Restatement \[Third…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · January 12, 2012 · in the opinion
O'neil v. Crane Co. (2012)
…plaintiffs' assertion on appeal, the case had not been tried or submitted to the jury on the theory that Ford had a duty to warn about hazards in replacement brakes and clutches. (Ford Motor v. Wood…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 25, 2019 · in the opinion
Kraus v. Alcatel-Lucent (2019)
…REILLY, REILLY JANICZEK & MCDEVITT, PC, STEPHEN SCOTT, REILLY MCDEVITT & HENRICH & SUSAN M. VALINIS, REILLY JANICZEK & MCDEVITT P.C. FORD MOTOR CO., Defendant, represented by DANIEL J. SINCLAIR, ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC & ERIC L. HORNE, ECKERT…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002 · in the opinion
Crane, Inc. v. Scribner (2002)
…2d at 996. In adopting 1990 as the critical date when the cause of action arose, the court, though supposedly applying Grimshaw, essentially applied the manifestation test. In Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, 119 Md. App…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 1, 1999 · in the opinion
Owens Corning v. Bauman (1999)
…the result is that Grimshaw and Abate are inconsistent and we, accordingly, should reject our holding construing the meaning of "arises" in Grimshaw. Owens Corning also contends that Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, 119 Md.App…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · October 22, 2010 · in the opinion
Robinson v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. (2010)
…cited in Lucas v. United States, 757 S.W.2d 687, 700 (Tex. 1988); see also Ford Motor Co. v. Sheldon, 22 S.W.3d 444, 456 (Tex. 2000) (defining a "special law" as one that…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 26, 2007 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Stephens (2007)
…of Appeals recently decided a case in which a brake worker had inhaled asbestos dust from installing the brake products of six different manufacturers. Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co., 91 S.W.3d 387, 393 (Tex…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · April 11, 2022 · in the opinion
Lishman v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)
…waive personal jurisdiction. The Court next turns to the merits of the personal jurisdiction defense. As discussed, personal jurisdiction is either general or specific. See Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eight Judicial District Court, 141 S…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)
…but they may be established by circumstantial evidence, in accordance with ordinary standards of proof. Romo v. Ford Motor Co., 99 Cal.App.4th 1115, 1141 (2002) ("It is difficult to imagine how corporate malice could…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · June 12, 2023 · in the opinion
Finello v. Foster Wheeler LLC (2023)
…fibers. We agree with Tragarz Court's approach and adopt it here. Gregg v. V-J Auto Parts Company, 943 A.2d at 225-226. In Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032 (Pa…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 13, 2007 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Stephens (2007)
…Appeals recently decided a case in which a brake worker had inhaled asbestos dust from installing the brake products of six different manufacturers. Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co., 91 S.W.3d 387, 393 (Tex.App…