No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

292 results for “General Electric”, page 3 of 15

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Melendrez v. Superior Court OF State OF California (2013)

    …subd. (b).) The reason for this waiver should be obvious. As a general matter, when an individual verifies discovery responses, further discovery can be directed to that individual to determine the sources for the initial responses…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · June 18, 2020 · in the opinion

    Kruse v. Actuant Corporation (2020)

    … 3.) After his military service, Mr. Jimenez was "honorably discharged as the civilian equivalent of a Certified Aircraft Electrical Mechanic and Technician." (Id.) Apart from his service, Mr. Jimenez also "performed both supervisorial and hands-on…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 23, 1994 · in the opinion

    Smith v. ACandS, Inc. (1994)

    …The specifications provide that the contractor is to comply with all safety regulations and eliminate hazards to its own and other workers and that all work is subject to general supervision and inspection by PG&E…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 26, 2012 · in the opinion

    Bankhead v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2012)

    …Baker & McKenzie (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1128, 1137-1138.) We give only a general summary of the facts relating to liability and compensatory damages, because the details are not germane to the issues presented by…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2007 · in the opinion

    Brumley v. Fdcc California, Inc. (2007)

    …to the heir.' \[Citations.\] Thus, in a wrongful death action the \injury' is not the general loss of the decedent, but the particular loss of the decedent to each individual claimant." (San Diego Gas & Electric, supra…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 15, 2015 · in the opinion

    Soto v. BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. (2015)

    …pain and suffering of the decedent, which is not recoverable as a general rule." The court nonetheless permitted Gabriel to testify about "\[h\]elping out Grandpa towards the end," including giving him morphine, changing his diapers…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 22, 2010

    Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2010)

    …and Discovery Worksites: Contra Costa Powerhouse; Moss Landing Powerhouse; Contra Costa Powerhouse, Antioch; Moss Landing Powerhouse, Moss Landing electrician Contra Costa Powerhouse Antioch 1961-1966 and 1969-1985; electrician Moss Landing Powerhouse Moss Landing 1985-1993

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 19, 1999 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Metalclad Insulation Corp. (1999)

    General Motors Corp., supra, 40 Cal.App.4th at p. 356, 47 Cal.Rptr.2d 580; Barr v. ACandS, Inc., supra, 57 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1049-1053, 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 494.) The issue…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · September 6, 2013 · in the opinion

    Lara v. CBS Corp. (2013)

    …2013. United States District Court, C.D. California. CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL AUDREY B. COLLINS, District Judge. Proceedings: ORDER Granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (In Chambers) Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Immediately Remand Plaintiffs…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 4, 2019 · in the opinion

    Linsowe v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2019)

    General Motors (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 1179, 1183.) We begin our independent review of the special verdict with the award of $532,685.37 in economic and noneconomic damages to Sharron Linsowe. The damages award…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 22, 2017 · in the opinion

    Turley v. Familian Corporation (2017)

    …Webb's evidence of exposure was sufficient. This is the language: "Special Electric contends the evidence was insufficient to show Webb was exposed to crocidolite asbestos it had supplied. The Court of Appeal rejected this argument…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 11, 1995 · in the opinion

    Morton v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1995)

    …may be admissible to prove what ordinary consumers of the product actually expect when those expectations are beyond the lay experience common to all jurors. (Soule v. General Motors Corp., supra, 8 Cal.4th at pp…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 18, 2016 · in the opinion

    Untermann v. D. Zelinsky & Sons, Inc. (2016)

    …witness declaration. We shall affirm the judgment. I. BACKGROUND Desin was an electrician. He alleged he was exposed to asbestos while working at various job sites and that as a result he developed mesothelioma, an asbestos…

  14. Court case · California Supreme Court · December 19, 2005 · in the opinion

    Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2005)

    …by overhead electrical wires\]; see also Rest.2d Torts, § 343A \[possessor of land liable for obvious danger if "the possessor should anticipate the harm despite such. . . obviousness"\].) The question before us is how these general principles…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2009 · in the opinion

    Short v. Sequoia Ventures, Inc. (2009)

    …offer competent and admissible evidence that Sequoia's predecessor in interest negligently or defectively designed and/or constructed the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) power plant where Gary Short was allegedly exposed to asbestos…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2003 · in the opinion

    Dekens v. Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (2003)

    …2d 916.) Centaur Manufacturing made a plastic plumbing pipe that was approved for listing by IAPMO in 1984 and 1985. (FNS Mortgage Service Corp. v. Pacific General Group, Inc., supra, 24 Cal.App.4th at p…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 28, 2017 · in the opinion

    Sandoval v. American Appliance Manufacturing Corp. (2017)

    …reflect a common source, as they rely on duties subject to the Rowland test under Civil Code section 1714, which "establishes a general duty to exercise ordinary care in one's activities." (Kesner, supra, at pp…

  18. Court case · California Supreme Court · August 28, 1997 · in the opinion

    Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997)

    …contained both amosite and chrysotile asbestos fibers. John McKinley, who worked as an electrician at Mare Island, recalled working with Rutherford in the early 1950's. He testified that Rutherford and he were often required to…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 8, 2018 · in the opinion

    Foglia v. Moore Dry Dock Company (2018)

    …secondary exposure, MDD challenged the evidence that Father worked for MDD at the shipyard as an electrician on ship conversion that had been introduced through decedent's deposition and Garcia's declaration as inadmissible hearsay, as…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 21, 2021 · in the opinion

    Benavidez v. Fluor Corp. (2021)

    …fact. Benavidez testified at his March 2018 deposition that during his first job at the Anheuser-Busch facility, Fluor employed electricians working at the site. Benavidez said he had "no idea" who employed the pipefitters. He…