No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

112 results for “General Electric”, page 3 of 6

  1. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 17, 1999

    Burgess v. Abex Corp. (1999)

    …and judgment for plaintiffs (the Burgess estate and Francis Burgess) against Abex Corporation and Pittsburgh Corning Corporation on a civil conspiracy theory. A defendant who understands the general objectives of a conspiracy to conceal asbestos hazards…

  2. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · February 6, 1986 · in the opinion

    Costello v. Unarco Industries, Inc. (1986)

    …242.) Applying a rule of reasonableness it was concluded that the intent of the General Assembly was that the time within which the cause of action may be discovered cannot remain open-ended and that it…

  3. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · March 5, 2013 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company (2013)

    …UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES, including Excess Insurance Company, Ltd., General Reinsurance Corporation, River Thames Insurance Company, World Auxiliary Insurance Corporation, and John Does 1 through 400, Defendants, (Allianz Underwriters…

  4. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · April 16, 2009 · in the opinion

    Nolan v. Weil-McLain (2009)

    …determining whether a plaintiff has satisfied the burden of proof at trial. We began by reciting the "general rule in civil cases" that a plaintiff bears the burden of producing evidence sufficient to establish each element…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois · April 23, 2019 · in the opinion

    Amling v. Schlage Lock Co. (2019)

    …policy only up to $425,000. Id. Recognizing the general rule that a suit to determine an insurer's obligations to indemnify is premature until the insured has been found liable, the Seventh Circuit nonetheless found…

  6. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · February 27, 1992 · in the opinion

    Betts v. Manville Personal Injury Trust (1992)

    …that would include fibrosis of the lungs. Plaintiffs do not contend the answers to the special interrogatories are inconsistent with the general verdicts as to Deitz and Lehr. The language employed is not ambiguous or confusing…

  7. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 4, 2013 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company (2013)

    …UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES, Including Excess Insurance Company, Ltd., General Reinsurance Corporation, River Thames Insurance Company, World Auxiliary Insurance Corporation, and John Does 1 Through 400, Defendants (Allianz Underwriters…

  8. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 26, 2001 · in the opinion

    Burns v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)

    … John Crane, Inc.; DAP, Inc.; Fibreboard Corporation; GAF Corporation; General Refractories Company; Harbison-Walker Refractories Company; Harcros Chemicals, Inc., as Successor-in-Interest to Thompson-Hayward Chemical Company; Kaiser Refractories, A Division of Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical…

  9. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 13, 1993 · in the opinion

    Kurrack v. American Dist. Telegraph Co. (1993)

    …asbestos paper was, in fact, the relevant product. Furthermore, as plaintiff correctly notes, interrogatories are properly given when they can serve as a check on the general verdict. (Saldana v. Wirtz Cartage Co. (1977), 55 Ill…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · May 31, 1985 · in the opinion

    Krull v. Celotex Corp. (1985)

    …Supp. 818, 821-22 (N.D.Cal.1983). But the general rule in such cases remains that, subject to certain exceptions, the asset-acquiring company is not liable for the debts and liabilities of the seller…

  11. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 1, 1988 · in the opinion

    H & H Plumbing Co. v. Indus. Comm'n (1988)

    …on claimant's testimony regarding his work on the boilers and the appearance of the gaskets. The Commission also relied on the testimony of Norris, H & H's general foreman, that the gaskets contained asbestos. Moreover…

  12. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 5, 2018 · in the opinion

    McKinney v. Hobart Bros. Co. (2018)

    …806 N.E.2d 645 (2004)), and it would be difficult to imagine a more general disclosure than the bare statement that defendant's products caused plaintiff's mesothelioma. Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 213(g)…

  13. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 9, 1991 · in the opinion

    Wehmeier v. Unr Industries, Inc. (1991)

    …OSHA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Solomon stated it was his general impression that the level of asbestos used at UNARCO's Bloomington plant was not safe. Solomon stated he never saw chrysotile asbestos ground…

  14. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · September 14, 1987 · in the opinion

    Zurich Insurance Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1987)

    …1981, in an unrelated action construing the comprehensive general liability policy's coverage for asbestos-related diseases, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia held that each insurer on the risk from…

  15. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 29, 2009 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Aurora Equipment Company (2009)

    …222 Ill. 2d at 437. The court then moved into a discussion of the Restatement (Second) of Torts and said that the general rule articulated in section 314A of the Restatement, "and long recognized by this…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 31, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bell v. Abb Group, Inc. (2015)

    …person's expertise. Generalized knowledge of a particular subject will not necessarily enable an expert to testify as to a specific subset of the general field of the expert's knowledge. Martinez v. Sakurai Graphic Sys…

  17. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 14, 1997 · in the opinion

    Van Winkle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997)

    …the general rule is that the trial court has a duty to provide instruction to the jury where it has posed an explicit question or requested clarification on a point of law arising from facts about…

  18. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 31, 2012 · in the opinion

    Menssen v. Pneumo Abex Corporation (2012)

    …signatory to the Saranac Agreement.) Abex received a copy of the 1948 Saranac report from Vandiver Brown, Johns-Manville's general counsel. Brown requested the nine financing companies meet in the Johns-Manville boardroom November 11…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 20, 2015 · in the opinion

    Neureuther v. Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC (2015)

    …person's expertise. Generalized knowledge of a particular subject will not necessarily enable an expert to testify as to a specific subset of the general field of the expert's knowledge. Martinez v. Sakurai Graphic Sys…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · February 14, 2014 · in the opinion

    Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2014)

    …Salisbury, 2014 WL 345214, at [\8]. This court will follow that middle path. In general, consistent with the bare metal defense, a manufacturer is not liable for materials it did not supply. But a duty may…