48 results for “General Electric”, page 3 of 3
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 5, 1999 · in the opinion
Pittsburgh Corning Corp. v. Walters (1999)
…be raised at any point in the proceeding. A preliminary motion is, therefore, necessary to assure the application of the laws of another jurisdiction. General Chem. Corp. v. De La Lastra, 852 S.W.2d 916…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion
Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer (2013)
…more widely used terminology in Virginia as well as the terminology used by the circuit court in this case. \[3\] Although the General Assembly later established a discovery rule for asbestos-related diseases based on diagnosis…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 1, 2019 · in the opinion
Finch v. Covil Corporation (2019)
…130:23 -131:1. The fact that this evidence also made Covil "look bad" in some general sense does not make it inadmissible character evidence or unfairly prejudicial under Rule 403. It was highly relevant and…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2009 · in the opinion
Silvestro v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2009)
…to chrysotile." \[3\] Although Silvestro again worked in construction after his career as boiler repairman, the evidence showed that use of asbestos in construction materials (and in general) was being curtailed by the 1970's, and…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Torres (2019)
…439 S.W.3d 332, 352 (Tex. 2014). Appellants do not dispute general causation. That is, they do not dispute that asbestos is capable of causing mesothelioma. However, each appellant argues that Oscar failed to establish…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 29, 2020 · in the opinion
Jackson v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2020)
…25-8 at 1. Similarly, Blanchard was employed by Avondale for over forty years as a supervisor, general superintendent, assistant vice president, and vice president, during which time he "oversaw the construction of all vessels." R…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · May 26, 1992 · in the opinion
Rohrbaugh v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1992)
…Appellants answered with a general denial that their products were defective and that they were negligent. The case was tried to a jury and the jury returned a verdict in favor of the Plaintiffs and against…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 28, 2022 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…. which of Defendants' experts offer the challenged general causation opinion." (Id. at 30.) The Court did not have the benefit of knowing which experts seek to testify that exposure to vehicle friction products categorically cannot cause…