74 results for “General Electric”, page 3 of 4
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 17, 2024
Constantine v. Lenox Instrument Co., Inc. (2024)
…order on delay damages, finding three periods wrongly excluded and remanding. A trial court may limit a toxicologist who is not a physician and has no experience diagnosing patients to general causation. Under Pa.R.Civ…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 19, 2018
Hubbard v. California Water Service Company (2018)
…the party asserting the exception to a hirer's general non-liability for a contractor's employees bears the burden of proving that the contractor neither knew nor could reasonably be expected to know of the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 15, 2019 · in the opinion
Burch v. Certainteed Corporation (2019)
…There, a subcontractor's employee sued a general contractor for injuries caused by the collapse of the general contractor's scaffolding; Cal-OSHA provisions were introduced at trial to establish a duty of care and a…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · January 25, 2021
Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2021)
…turns on actual or constructive notice and is ordinarily a jury question; a railroad's general knowledge of asbestos hazards and disputed evidence of escaping dust prevent summary judgment on foreseeability. Causation; Employer and Contractor Liability…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014
Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)
…visited jobsites Home construction jobsites in southern California mid to late 1970's; owner of a home construction business who visited jobsites Home construction jobsites in southern California 1970s; general contractor Construction projects 1960s and 1970s
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · July 15, 2020 · in the opinion
Coates v. Ford Motor Company (2020)
…of a summary judgment motion, as well as foregoing the ruling on such a motion either temporarily until later in the proceedings or for resolution by trial of the general issue, involves not only pure legal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · January 21, 1994 · in the opinion
Tabolt v. Flintkote Co. (In re New York Asbestos Litigation, 1994)
…at 982 F.2d 721 (2d Cir.1992), and the publication of numerous stories in the New York Times and Wall Street Journal — any well-informed citizen could possess general knowledge about Johns Manville, c.f.…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · July 18, 2007 · in the opinion
Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Company (2007)
…applicable. ¶ 28 The doctrine of judicial estoppel holds that "\[a\]s a general rule, a party to an action is estopped from assuming a position inconsistent with his or her assertion in a previous action, if…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)
…which may be as little as three months." Though acknowledging a "general inference that Crocidolite \[asbestos\] is more liable to produce mesothelioma," the report cautioned that "\[e\]xoneration of \[Union Carbide's\] Chrysotile \[asbestos\] has not…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2018 · in the opinion
Trapp v. CertainTEED Corporation (2018)
…at p. 1143.) The Supreme Court explained: "By making exceptions to Civil Code section 1714's general duty of ordinary care only when foreseeability and policy considerations justify a categorical no-duty rule, we preserve the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 17, 2000 · in the opinion
Ashdown v. Ameron International Corp. (2000)
…1982, the dual capacity exception to the general exclusivity of the workers' compensation remedy has been limited to the narrow factual circumstances presented where the employee's injury was caused by the employer's product, which…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 24, 2012 · in the opinion
Evans v. Certainteed Corp. (2012)
…Trutanich, City Attorney, Richard M. Brown, General Counsel of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, and Lisa S. Berger, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Cross-Respondent Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. K…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014 · in the opinion
Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014)
…which may be as little as three months." Though acknowledging a "general inference that Crocidolite \[asbestos\] is more liable to produce mesothelioma," the report cautioned that "\[e\]xoneration of \[Union Carbide's\] Chrysotile \[asbestos\] has not…
-
Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · August 1, 1989 · in the opinion
Mauro v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1989)
…in the evaluation of the damage claim against the defendant. In this way, to the extent that men can achieve justice through general rules, a just balance of the warring interests is accomplished. \[Citations omitted\]. Cf…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 15, 2007 · in the opinion
Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Co. (2007)
…approach a situation to which the term judicial estoppel is applicable. ¶ 28 The doctrine of judicial estoppel holds that "\[a\]s a general rule, a party to an action is estopped from assuming a position inconsistent…
-
Court case · Arkansas Court of Appeals · April 3, 1985 · in the opinion
Alcoa v. Vann (1985)
… 81-1314(5)(iii) (Repl. 1976) provides: No compensation shall be payable for any ordinary disease of life to which the general public is exposed. These statutes require that a causal connection between the claimant's…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · January 2, 2013 · in the opinion
Church v. Dana Kepner Company, Inc. (2013)
…standing to file motions to quash the challenged subpoenas. The general rule is that a party has no standing to quash a subpoena served upon a third party, except as to claims of privilege or upon…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 11, 2018 · in the opinion
Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Coates (2018)
…PROCEEDINGS Until it closed in 1989, Marcantoni was a Baltimore-based general construction contracting company that specialized in highway and utility work for local governments in the greater Baltimore area. Its headquarters was located on Broening…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 8, 2017 · in the opinion
Paulus v. JM Manufacturing Co., Inc. (2017)
…so by letter brief, and they have done so. Appellant argues the court retains jurisdiction under the general authority of Code of Civil Procedure section 128 (courts have power to "compel obedience to its judgments, orders…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · July 29, 2008 · in the opinion
Clayton v. American Biltrate (2008)
…1263 (D.R.I. 1993). As a general note, to the extent Defendants in asbestos litigation choose to file motions for summary judgment before they have responded to plaintiffs' reasonable discovery requests—including, but not limited…