57 results for “General Electric”, page 3 of 3
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 17, 2020 · in the opinion
Conaway v. ABB (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…the state of Florida. ABB further argues that they are not incorporated in New York and do not maintain their principal place of business here, thus there is no general jurisdiction. Furthermore, ABB contends that Plaintiffs…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 10, 2016 · in the opinion
Wines v. Abb, Inc. (2016)
…including Plaintiff DONNIE LACY WINES, as well as other users, bystanders, household members and members of the general public of the risks of asbestos; (c) Failed to adequately test, research, or investigate asbestos and/or its…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 3, 2013 · in the opinion
Liberman v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2013)
…Q Do you know the brand name, trade name or manufacturer's name of any of the old panels that you removed. . .? A Yes. Q What were those names? A General — . . . like Cutler-Hammer, GE, Murray…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 9, 2019 · in the opinion
Alder v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…old and is living with mesothelioma (see Aff in Supp., Exhibit J). Mr. Conaway served as both a Naval and civilian electrician for several decades (Aff in Supp., Exh J at 39-40, 54, 78-79…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 24, 2024 · in the opinion
Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)
…causation standard, and then arguing that the second "substantial factor" prong is not met). Only in its reply does Eaton raise doubts about Plaintiff's actual bystander exposure to its asbestos-containing electrical products. Dkt. No…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 2017 · in the opinion
Macaluso v. A.O. Smith Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…rock, floor tiles, and electrical equipment), and also while employed as a plumber's helper (from boilers and boiler insulation) during the period 1972 to 1982. Eugene Story-(deceased) Was exposed to Asbestos dust from valves…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 17, 2016 · in the opinion
Cicio v. American Biltrite (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2016)
…and insulation. In the 1970s, Keeny worked for PSI, a division of Warner Electric, as a senior applications engineer and regional sales manager, where he inspected brakes and clutches at various commercial and industrial worksites, including…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 28, 2001 · in the opinion
Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)
…and Johnny Johnson. CBS Corporation, formerly known as Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Westinghouse), settled and dismissed their appeals with all plaintiffs but Earlven Gauthe and Johnny Johnson after oral argument, but days before…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 13, 2017 · in the opinion
Brooks v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…to asbestos in the following manner: Ronald Brooks: (Living with Lung Cancer) Exposed to Asbestos while working as a construction worker, fireman, and during service as electrician's mate in the U.S. Navy, (1974-1989)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2023 · in the opinion
Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2023)
…reliability, the Court "assess\[es\] the \[expert's\] reasoning or methodology, using as appropriate such criteria as testability, publication in peer reviewed literature, and general acceptance." Id. at 564. III. DISCUSSION As an initial matter, the…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Christy v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 18, 2019 · in the opinion
ALBIN v. AJAX MAGNETHERMIC CORPORATION (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 17, 2019 · in the opinion
Knudsen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 17, 2015 · in the opinion
Melendrez v. Ameron International Corporation (2015)
In general, for the purposes of the causation requirement in workers' compensation, it is sufficient if the connection between work and the injury be a contributing cause of the injury. . . .' \[Citations.\]" (Id. at pp. 298-299…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · April 15, 2021 · in the opinion
Reed v. Reichhold Liquidation, Inc. (2021)
…Iowa State Bar Association indicate that a "harm is within the scope of a defendant's liability if that harm arises from the same general types of danger that the defendant should have taken reasonable steps…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 22, 2016 · in the opinion
Bartolone v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2016)
…a Union Carbide product or provide a "scientific expression" of an exposure level. Dr. Moline cannot establish general or specific causation, defendant argues, where the product cannot be identified. PLAINTIFF'S ARGUMENTS Plaintiff argues that Campanella…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 22, 2018 · in the opinion
Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)
…517, 526 (N.D. Cal. 2009) ("A general concern over litigation does not trigger a duty to preserve evidence."). Absent a duty to retain destroyed records, there can be no spoliation. IV. Motion to Strike MNRM…