No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

139 results for “General Electric”, page 3 of 7

  1. Court case · North Carolina Supreme Court · November 5, 1985 · in the opinion

    Wilder v. Amatex Corp. (1985)

    …E.2d 281 (1972); Galligan v. Chapel Hill, 276 N.C. 172, 171 S.E.2d 427 (1970); Domestic Electric Service Co., Inc. v. Rocky Mount, 20 N.C.App. 347, 201 S.E.2d 508…

  2. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 13, 2006 · in the opinion

    Chenot v. AP Green Services, Inc. (2006)

    …and (c) fails to exercise reasonable care to protect them against the danger. Pennsylvania law imposes no general duty on property owners to prepare and maintain a safe building for the benefit of a contractor's…

  3. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 26, 1984 · in the opinion

    Halphen v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)

    …Cf. Andries v. General Motors Corp., 444 So.2d 1180, 1183 (La.1983) (affirming trial court's jury instructions that "manufacturer of a product must give an adequate warning of any danger inherent in any product…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 13, 2017 · in the opinion

    Brooks v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …to asbestos in the following manner: Ronald Brooks: (Living with Lung Cancer) Exposed to Asbestos while working as a construction worker, fireman, and during service as electrician's mate in the U.S. Navy, (1974-1989)…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Brown v. Bell & Gosset Co. (2013)

    …cross-examination Mr. Brown testified that he was directed by the owner or general contractor at each of the sites at which he worked concerning the type of insulation to be used (Deposition pp. 386-388…

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 11, 2013 · in the opinion

    Brown v. Bell & Gossett Co. (2013)

    …14th Street and for LILCO the Northport, who was it that told the insulators and the boilermakers and the steamfitters and the electricians and the plumbers, who was it that told all of the trades what…

  7. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 25, 1993 · in the opinion

    Dempsey v. Pacor, Inc. (1993)

    …1094 (1991). Appellees acknowledge this general pronouncement of law but contend that retroactive application should only occur when the issue at the center of the change in law has been properly preserved for review. Certainly appellants…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 18, 2019 · in the opinion

    ALBIN v. AJAX MAGNETHERMIC CORPORATION (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · December 11, 1990 · in the opinion

    Knox v. AC & S, Inc. (1990)

    …Code sections 22-3-7-2 through XX-X-X-XX as the IWODA despite the fact that the Indiana General Assembly repealed the Act's short title in 1988. \[5\] The employer's exemption from…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 27, 2020

    Hill v. Mallinckrodt LLC (2020)

    The district court denied Mallinckrodt's Rule 12(b)(7) motion to dismiss for failure to join the settled general contractors, so the executor's wrongful-death suit proceeds. A party is not a required party…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · February 27, 1986

    Kisor v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    …in the 1940s and 1950s, and argued that it could not be liable for a danger it did not know about. The jury returned a general verdict for Owens-Illinois. The Ninth Circuit, applying Washington law…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · May 7, 1986

    Silver v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    …§ 1-50(6), barred the claim because his last exposure was in 1961. The Fourth Circuit agreed that the statute applies to wrongful death actions in general. It held, however, that the statute did not apply…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 27, 1990

    Chevron USA v. Workers'comp. Appeals BD. (1990)

    …mesothelioma was not an outgrowth of the asbestosis. It also held that a 1986 California Supreme Court case, General Foundry, did not require a single date of injury. It denied the family's request for attorney…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · February 28, 1986 · in the opinion

    Joyce v. AC and S., Inc. (1986)

    No ordinary disease of life to which the general public is exposed outside of the employment shall be compensable, except: (1) When it follows as an incident of occupational disease as defined in this title; or…

  15. Court case · Minnesota Supreme Court · May 14, 1982 · in the opinion

    DeCosse v. Armstrong Cork Co. (1982)

    …the court concluded that because the tolling provisions of the general limitations statute were in existence prior to the enactment of the wrongful death statute the legislature "could not possibly have had in mind that the…

  16. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 29, 2023

    Barker v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2023)

    …Koehring, an executive officer is personally liable only if the employer delegated a personal duty of care to him and he breached it; general administrative responsibility is not enough. Employer and Contractor Liability, and Workers' Compensation…

  17. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · January 28, 2004

    Psi Energy, Inc. v. Roberts (2004)

    …and the landowner should have anticipated the harm, including where it saw workers going unprotected. A general verdict stands if the evidence supports any one theory of liability. Premises Owner Liability; Fault, Apportionment and Settlement Credits…

  18. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 1, 2021

    Lege v. Union Carbide Corporation (2021)

    …affirmed the judgment for the Leges, including the 51% fault allocation to Birla. A jury's allocation of fault and general damages is reviewed for manifest error or abuse of discretion, and exposure need not be…

  19. Court case · Missouri Supreme Court · September 10, 1991

    Hagen v. Celotex Corp. (1991)

    …A plaintiff must show through expert testimony that each defendant's product was a substantial factor in causing the harm. Evidence showing only asbestos exposure in general, or that a defendant's product may have contributed…

  20. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · September 25, 2012 · in the opinion

    State EX rel. Qunicel v. Indus. Comm. (2012)

    …Ohio, Tenth District, Franklin County. Philip J. Fulton Law Office, and Chelsea J. Fulton, for relator. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Stephen D. Plymale, for respondent Industrial Commission of Ohio. Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP…