62 results for “General Electric”, page 3 of 4
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · October 18, 1995 · in the opinion
ACandS, Inc. v. Godwin (1995)
…we have now evidence of the consequences of exposure, but we do not have, in general, accurate measures of the levels of exposure occurring 20 or 30 years ago, which have given rise to these consequences…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · July 20, 1992 · in the opinion
Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (1992)
…TAMILIA, KELLY and JOHNSON, JJ. [\442] WIEAND, Judge: The general issue in this asbestos exposure action is whether Pennsylvania, in the context of asbestos actions, shall be a one-disease or two-disease state. More specifically…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 18, 1994 · in the opinion
Keystone Steel and Wire Co. v. Costa (1994)
…689, 485 N.E.2d 500.) In general, a new trial on the question of damages only is appropriately granted where (1) the jury's verdict on the question of liability is amply supported by the…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · March 5, 2015 · in the opinion
Jones v. 84 Lumber Company (2015)
…which was to standardize and simplify the proof of laws of foreign states." Id. In 1940, the Rhode Island General Assembly enacted a revised form of the Judicial Notice of Foreign Law Act, P.L. 1940…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · October 19, 2017 · in the opinion
French v. AW Chesterton Company (2017)
…ANALYSIS I. Motion to Strike Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 32(a) addresses when a deposition may be used as evidence at a hearing or trial. (1) In General. At a hearing or trial, all or…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 16, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. John Crane (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · January 10, 2002 · in the opinion
Harris v. AC & S., Inc. (2002)
…1995), trans. denied. In general, product liability actions must be brought within two years after the cause of action accrues or within ten years after the delivery of the product to the initial user or consumer…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 13, 2021 · in the opinion
Mrjaj v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2021)
…He further testified the International Chimney that was "in existence at that time" was the general contractor and performed the work on furnace number 4 in 1957 at Hanna Furnaces (NYSEF Doc 457 pages 137-145…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 27, 2013 · in the opinion
Fisher v. Beazer East, Inc. (2013)
…the enactment of OSHA. {¶ 10} William Gabriel ("Gabriel"), former assistant to the general manager of Ferro's Engineering Division, testified on cross-examination that Ferro had been the second largest manufacturer of hot tops. Until 1974…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. Caterpillar, Inc. (2017)
…must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 30, 1999 · in the opinion
Porter Hayden Company v. Wyche (1999)
…to the earliest diagnosis, from adenocarcinoma is 13.2 years." Although Porter Hayden seems to take issue in its reply brief with the use of general epidemiological testimony to draw inferences in specific cases, in Grimshaw…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 13, 2013 · in the opinion
Lipson v. ON Marine Services Company, LLC (2013)
…court must assess the reasoning or methodology, using as appropriate such criteria as testability, publication in peer reviewed literature, and general acceptance, but the inquiry is a flexible one." Primiano v. Cook, 598 F.3d 558…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion
Nolen v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2012)
…or 1975. Again, Ay's general testimony that manufacturers, including Foster Wheeler, specified the use of asbestos insulation up until 1971 does not lead to a reasonable inference that asbestos was specified by Foster Wheeler at…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 2, 2013 · in the opinion
Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Carter (2013)
…the non manufacturer supplier to warn plaintiffs is different under some circumstances than the duty of a manufacturer. In general, the supplier-installer is not held to a standard as strict as imposed on the manufacturer.
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · November 22, 2004 · in the opinion
Gibson v. Workers'compensation Appeal Board (2004)
…We note that, in general, questions concerning the admission and exclusion of evidence are within the sound discretion of the tribunal and are not to be reversed on appeal absent a finding of an abuse of…
-
Court case · Indiana Supreme Court · March 25, 2003 · in the opinion
Harris v. AC & S., Inc. (2003)
…was proximately caused by his exposure to asbestos-containing products provided by the Defendants. The Indiana General Assembly has enacted two statutes that limit the period of time within which individuals can file product liability claims…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 18, 1994 · in the opinion
Costa v. Dresser Industries, Inc. (1994)
…246 N.E.2d 269.) The general rule as to statements made by counsel in opening statement that certain evidence will be introduced is that such statements are not improper if made in good faith and…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · January 26, 2017 · in the opinion
Wagner v. Standard Steel, Lcc (2017)
…Forge operated the plant under the "Standard Steel" name. In general terms, Freedom Forge was engaged in the business of "manufacturing and selling railway wheels, railway axles and other forged metal products from various facilities and…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 24, 2009 · in the opinion
Cashman v. Pacific Scientific Company (2009)
…was presumptively a part of furnace insulation during the 1960s and 1970s. He testified, "My experience and the general understanding is that while there may have been Marigold ceramics, other options available, as there are today…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · February 13, 1986 · in the opinion
Zupan v. Industrial Com. (1986)
…term \Occupational Disease' means a disease arising out of and in the course of employment. Ordinary diseases of life to which the general public is exposed outside of the employment shall not be compensable \ \ \." (Ill. Rev…