No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

65 results for “General Electric”, page 3 of 4

  1. Court case · Arizona Supreme Court · August 21, 2013 · in the opinion

    Pounders v. Enserch E & C, Inc. (2013)

    …light of § 175's comment (a), which states that "the law applicable to wrongful death is selected by the same principles as control selection of the law applicable to personal injuries in general (see § 146)." ¶ 20…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · March 3, 2020 · in the opinion

    Paroni EX rel. Estate OF Paroni v. Alstom SA (2020)

    …contacts with New York, Elodie relies most heavily on Alstom's website's statement that its "U.S. Headquarters" are in New York to argue that Alstom is subject to general jurisdiction here. See Pl. Mem…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 15, 2017 · in the opinion

    Mayeaux v. Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc. (2017)

    …or to comprehensive and detailed regulations."\[33\] Plaintiff contends that establishing that the relevant acts occurred under the "general auspices" of federal direction is insufficient to warrant removal under Section 1442(a)(1).\[34\] Plaintiff argues…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 13, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)

    …465 (5th Cir. 1991))). 473 While plaintiffs cite several pre-Davis cases that reiterate the general rule that end-users must be warned, these decisions do not address what happens when a manufacturer sells to a…

  5. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · June 10, 1986 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    …Inc., Rapid American, Uni-Royal, Carolina Asbestos Co., J. Franklin Burke General Asbestos Co., Ruberoid Company, Keaseey Mattison Co., Asten Hill Manufacturing Co. Argued December 17, 1985. Filed June 10, 1986. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. [\60…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · September 21, 2022 · in the opinion

    Darden v. Western Asbestos Settlement Trust (In re Western Asbestos Settlement Trust, 2022)

    …named in a release to be included in the release. "\[T\]o obtain summary judgment on the ground that a general release has discharged him from liability, a third party to the release agreement must affirmatively…

  7. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    St. Romain v. Delta Southern Co., Inc. (2021)

    …comprehensive general liability policy are dismissed with prejudice; \[2\] \[Liberty's\] motion for summary judgment filed on or about 28 February 2020 is granted in part and denied in part, and accordingly, no comprehensive general liability…

  8. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 5, 2018 · in the opinion

    McKinney v. Hobart Bros. Co. (2018)

    …806 N.E.2d 645 (2004)), and it would be difficult to imagine a more general disclosure than the bare statement that defendant's products caused plaintiff's mesothelioma. Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 213(g)…

  9. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · February 18, 2020 · in the opinion

    Chevron Oronite Company, LLC v. Jacobs Field Services North America, Incorporated (2020)

    …1993) ("In Louisiana. . . civil actions, the plaintiff, in general, has the burden of proving every essential element of his case."). \[26\] See Fontenot, 791 F.2d at 1216-17. Absent such notice, actual, rather than potential…

  10. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 7, 1992 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Armstrong (1992)

    …283 Md. 296, 327, 389 A.2d 887, 905 (1978). Causation is a necessary element of any strict liability action. Phipps v. General Motors Corp., 278 Md. 337, 344, 363 A.2d 955, 958 (1976). In…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 23, 2019 · in the opinion

    Chevron Oronite Company v. Jacobs Field Services North America, Inc. (2019)

    …amount was excessive in light of the facts known or reasonably available to the insured at the time of settlement. The burden should, in general, be on the insurer, since its breach of contract \[i.e.…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · October 21, 2022 · in the opinion

    Reulet v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)

    …Plaintiffs have produced two copies of a purported Certificate Of Insurance (the "COI") showing that Eagle Asbestos was insured by American during the Policy Period under a Comprehensive General Liability Policy (GL) numbered K-230-9953…

  13. Court case · Arizona Court of Appeals · April 17, 2012 · in the opinion

    Pounders v. Enserch E & C, Inc. (2012)

    …1971) ("The fact ... that one of the parties is domiciled ... in a given state will usually carry little weight of itself."); Ferren v. General Motors Corp., 137 N.H. 423, 427, 628 A.2d 265 (1993…

  14. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · July 18, 2011 · in the opinion

    Yankee v. APV North America, Inc. (2011)

    …We hold that the general rule that there is no duty under common law products liability or negligence principles to warn of the dangers of exposure to asbestos in other manufacturers' products applies with regard to…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 8, 2015 · in the opinion

    Vedros v. Northrop Grumman (2015)

    …who suffered the physical injury. See LA. CIV. CODE art. 2315.6. \[2\] For the same reasons announced in Comardelle v. Pennsylvania General Ins. Co., No. 13-6555, 2014 WL 5762841, at [\3] (E.D. La…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 10, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)

    …and simply restate the general rule that the corporate form may be disregarded in some instances.\[43\] As plaintiffs have not produced evidence supporting even a single factor that Louisiana courts look to when analyzing whether…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 23, 2010 · in the opinion

    Cowley v. Acands, Inc. (2010)

    …deceased, former testimony is not excluded under the general rule disallowing the admission of hearsay.\[4\] Former testimony is \[t\]estimony given as a witness at another hearing of the same or a different proceeding, or…

  18. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 9, 2008 · in the opinion

    Spillman v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2008)

    …Roggli testified that an examination of a lung tissue sample from Mr. Spillman confirmed that he was exposed to asbestos at a rate much higher than that of the general background population. \[3\] La. C.C…

  19. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · May 16, 1985 · in the opinion

    Sheppard v. AC & S. Co. (1985)

    …Daum on May 24, 1982. On the other hand, the defendants' position is [\1130] that the cause of action is time-barred due to presence of general symptoms, namely, shortness of breath, as early as 1974…

  20. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · February 27, 1992 · in the opinion

    Stevenson v. Keene Corp. (1992)

    …mid 1980's, concern over the insurance industry and tort litigation prompted many reports on both a national and state level. See United States Attorney General's Tort Policy Working Group, Report on the Causes, Extent…