55 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 3 of 3
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · July 11, 2014 · in the opinion
Bostic v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. (2014)
…in Flores we discussed the California Supreme Court's decision in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.\[17\] That case described how expert testimony was presented from both sides establishing "that the plaintiffs' asbestos-related disease [\339…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · June 21, 2021 · in the opinion
Petrie v. Novelis Corporation (2021)
…evidence of a quantified defendant-specific dose sufficient to show a doubling of the risk of contracting mesothelioma is not required. See ECF 58 at 16 (citing Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 941 P.2d 1203…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · May 18, 2000
Todd Shipyards Corporation v. Perez (2000)
…appeals' reversal of summary judgment for Todd and in favor of Garcia's daughters; Justices Hecht and Owen dissented from the denial. Asbestos Bankruptcies; Wrongful Death and Survival Worksites: Todd Shipyards employee Todd Shipyards 1954-1974
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 27, 2007
Alcoa, Inc. v. Behringer (2007)
…that they take nothing against Alcoa, because Alcoa owed no legal duty. An employer owes no legal duty for take-home asbestos exposure unless the risk was foreseeable at the time; in the 1950s the danger…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 1, 2006
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Altimore (2006)
…during the relevant period. Under Texas foreseeability principles, an employer owes no duty to an employee's spouse for take-home asbestos exposure before the risk was foreseeable; unreliable case reports did not make the risk…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · August 1, 1983
Hargrave v. Fibreboard Corp. (1983)
…or alter ego liability, for its subsidiary's acts merely because it owns all the stock and sets general policy while corporate separateness is observed. A party that does not raise fact issues on its pleaded…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 1, 2009 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Smith (2009)
…or third party claim" and "Property owner" as "a person or entity that owns real property primarily used for commercial or business purposes"). We note that our sister court has recently issued a plurality opinion questioning…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · May 11, 1995 · in the opinion
Able Supply Co. v. Moye (1995)
…Nix, Daingerfield, Walter Umphrey, Beaumont, Franklin Jones, Jr., Marshall, for respondent. Justice OWEN, delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice GONZALEZ, Justice HIGHTOWER, Justice HECHT, Justice CORNYN, Justice GAMMAGE and Justice…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 24, 1999 · in the opinion
Perez v. Todd Shipyards Corp. (1999)
…e.). \[3\] A claim that is derivative is one "which has not its origin in itself, but owes its existence to something foregoing." BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 443 (6th Ed.1990); see also Fidelity & Deposit Co…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · May 25, 2022 · in the opinion
EL Paso Energy Est Company v. Chevron USA Inc. (2022)
…El Paso's defense costs in that suit. (Dkt. 41 at p. 4). "\[A\]s Chevron owes no duty to defend El Paso, it, a fortiori, has no duty to indemnify it." (Dkt. 41 at p…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas · October 30, 2000 · in the opinion
In re National Gypsum Co. (2000)
…its assets would total approximately $374,713,686. Hilton testified that the trust owes asbestos property damage claimants $32,000,000. The Center contends that the trust owes approximately $197,836,030, for previously settled claims…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · May 8, 2015 · in the opinion
Abutahoun v. Dow Chemical Company (2015)
…Chapter 95. Instead, the chapter uses the phrase "property owner," which section 95.001(3) defines to mean "a person or entity that owns real property primarily used for commercial or business purposes." TEX. CIV. PRAC…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 11, 2007 · in the opinion
Alcoa, Inc. v. Behringer (2007)
…Siegler, 899 S.W.2d 195, 197 (Tex.1995) ("The threshold inquiry in a negligence case is whether the defendant owes a legal duty to the plaintiff."). If there is no legal duty, liability for negligence…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas · March 21, 2011 · in the opinion
In re Placid Oil Company (2011)
…that have been sued by the Post-Confirmation Tort Claimants. \[25\] Placid is now a subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum Corporation and remains an active corporation that owns oil and gas interests. See Defendants' Exhibit 1-C…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas · January 18, 2012 · in the opinion
In re Placid Oil Company (2012)
…that have been sued by the Post-Confirmation Tort Claimants. \[27\] Placid is now a subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum Corporation and remains an active corporation that owns oil and gas interests. See Defendants' Exhibit 1-C…