No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

57 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 3 of 3

  1. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · September 18, 2014 · in the opinion

    Walston v. Boeing Company (2014)

    …Indianapolis, IN, 46268, Amicus Curiae on behalf of COAlition for Litigation Justice, Inc. OWENS, J. In 1911, the legislature passed the Industrial Insurance Act (IIA), Title 51 RCW, creating a no-fault system for efficiently compensating…

  2. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 9, 2007 · in the opinion

    Herring v. Texaco, Inc. (2007)

    …Appeals and remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. WE CONCUR: GERRY L. ALEXANDER, C.J., and CHARLES W. JOHNSON, SUSAN OWENS, BARBARA A. MADSEN, MARY E. FAIRHURST, RICHARD B. SANDERS…

  3. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · June 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2009)

    …the Court of Appeals and hold the trial court erred by dismissing Lunsford's strict product liability claims [\1104] against Saberhagen. We remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. WE CONCUR: SUSAN OWENS, CHARLES W…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 26, 2013 · in the opinion

    Hoyt v. Lockheed Shipbuilding Company (2013)

    …Court does not read the Supreme Court's footnote in Simonetta as a wholesale rejection of the relevance of foreseeability to the analysis of whether a party owes a duty of care in a particular situation…

  5. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 7, 2005

    Brown v. Crown Cork & Seal Company (2005)

    Owen Brown, diagnosed with mesothelioma in October 2002, sued several companies, including Honeywell International, the successor to Bendix Corporation. He claimed he was exposed to asbestos from Bendix brake products while working at a service station…

  6. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 24, 2023

    Buckholtz v. American Optical Corporation (2023)

    …it remanded to vacate the judgment against Zidell Explorations and for a new trial. A company that owns a ship being dismantled and retains the right to control the work can owe a duty to the…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · August 5, 2021

    Wineland v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)

    …factor, with evidence of the amount and duration of exposure. A manufacturer owes a duty to warn about third-party replacement parts only if its product requires the part to function as intended. Causation; Product Identification…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · February 22, 2021 · in the opinion

    Jack v. Dco, LLC (2021)

    …position. See Keller v. City of Spokane, 44 P.3d 845, 848 (Wash. 2002) (en banc) ("a court must decide not only who owes the duty, but also to whom the duty is owed. . . ."). Here, the…

  9. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · September 16, 2024 · in the opinion

    Sorrentino v. Ammco Tools, Inc. (2024)

    …industry custom or feasibility of design can be considered when the plaintiff opens the door by "present\[ing\] evidence that puts in issue the custom of the industry or feasibility of alternative design" as "the defendant…

  10. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · December 14, 2010 · in the opinion

    Macias v. Mine Safety Appliances Co. (2010)

    …manufactured. ¶ 17 Macias argues that the purpose of a manufacturer's product is relevant to the question of whether the manufacturer owes a duty to warn of the dangers of another manufacturer's hazardous product. In…

  11. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2017 · in the opinion

    Rublee v. Carrier Corporation (2017)

    …Jan. 12, 2015) (court order). \[12\] Owen v. Burlington N. Santa Fe R.R. Co., 153 Wn.2d 780, 787, 108 P.3d 1220 (2005). \[13\] Owen, 153 Wn.2d at 787. \[14\] Lybbert v. Grant…

  12. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 3, 2017 · in the opinion

    Woo v. General Electric Company (2017)

    …Under Restatement (Second) of Torts § 388, a manufacturer owes a duty to warn of hazards for the use of a product that are or should be known to a manufacturer. Simonetta, 165 Wn.2d at 348. …

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 12, 2022 · in the opinion

    United States Fidelity & Guaranty v. Ulbricht (2022)

    …USF&G, Defendants contend, "has thus far refused to pay anything towards the accrued interest" and therefore "owes at least $171,172.60" in interest on the $4.5 million covenant judgment. (Id.) However, the record…

  14. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 8, 2010 · in the opinion

    Cashman v. Pacific Scientific Company (2010)

    …2d at 248). While this appeal was pending, the Supreme Court held that a manufacturer owes no common law duty to warn of the hazards of asbestos insulation that it did not manufacture, sell, or supply…

  15. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 31, 2011 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Aurora Pump Co. (2011)

    …cases, the Washington Supreme Court held, in relevant part, that a manufacturer owes no common law duty to warn of the hazards of an asbestos-containing product that it did not manufacture, sell, or supply. Simonetta…

  16. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · December 13, 2021 · in the opinion

    Wright v. 3M Company (2021)

    …landowner's premises. Id. The parties do not dispute Wright's status as an invitee. A landowner owes an invitee the duty of care set forth in the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343 (Am Law Inst.

  17. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2016 · in the opinion

    Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2016)

    …Jan. 12, 2015) (court order). \[12\] Owen v. Burlington N. Santa Fe R.R. Co., 153 Wash.2d 780, 787, 108 P.3d 1220 (2005). \[13\] Owen, 153 Wash.2d at 787, 108 P.3d 1220…