49 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 3 of 3
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 4, 2008 · in the opinion
Holliday v. Warren Pumps LLC (2008)
…to a reasonable medical probability a substantial factor in contributing to any asbestos-related disease suffered by him, pursuant to the standard of proof articulated in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 27, 2017 · in the opinion
Hiett v. Ac&r Insulation Co., Inc. (2017)
…the Court of Appeals referenced this Court's decision in Adams v. Owens-Illinois, stating that our decision applied "the same policy of avoiding expansive new duties to hold that an employer owed no duty to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · March 28, 2016 · in the opinion
Walashek v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…A. Governing Law In asbestos-related latent injury cases, the plaintiff "must first establish some threshold exposure to the defendant's defective asbestos-containing products." Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953, 982 (1997…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · February 16, 2016 · in the opinion
Walashek v. Air Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…medical probability that a particular exposure or series of exposures was a "legal cause" of his injury — i.e., a substantial factor in bringing about the injury. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · July 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)
…of these arguments in turn.\[1\] I. Threshold Exposure Plaintiff's claims require proof that Defendant caused or contributed to Donald Willis's exposure to asbestos. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953, 975…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · April 12, 2017 · in the opinion
Carroll v. Abb, Inc. (2017)
…metal defense provides that "a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." Spychalla v…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 8, 2012 · in the opinion
Adler v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2012)
…Specifically, he alleges exposure to asbestos-containing boilers, furnaces, pumps, valves, steam traps, baker ovens, gaskets, and other items. Mr. Wexler was diagnosed with lung cancer on May 12, 2011. He is currently sixty-eight years…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 1, 2012 · in the opinion
Conner v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2012)
…now holds that, under maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute.
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · December 29, 1998 · in the opinion
Hamilton v. Garlock, Inc. (1998)
…426 F.2d 205, 211 (2d Cir.1970). Here, Plaintiff concedes that Atlas has no offices or owns no real estate in New York, that it maintains no bank accounts in this state, and that it…