No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

177 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 3 of 9

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2008 · in the opinion

    Garza v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (2008)

    …DISCUSSION A. Personal Jurisdiction\[\\\\] B. Arena v. Owens-Corning In Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation (Arena) (1998) 63 Cal. App.4th 1178, 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 580, Division One of this Court upheld a judgment…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 5, 2016 · in the opinion

    Evans v. Foster Wheeler Energy, Corporation (2016)

    …colorable federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidtv. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d Cir. 1998)…

  3. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 13, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Stephens (2007)

    …by defendant, and coworker testified that he used defendant's pipe covering approximately ninety percent of time and installed it in areas where plaintiff regularly worked). But cf. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · May 18, 2000 · in the opinion

    Hamilton v. Garlock, Inc. (2000)

    …must bear the burden of establishing the equitable share of culpability attributable to each of the settling defendants. Zalinka v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 221 A.D.2d 830, 633 N.Y.S.2d 884 (1995)…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · February 19, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bray v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. (2015)

    … Chavez v. Noble Drilling Corp., 567 F.2d 287, 289 (5th Cir. 1978); Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 595 So. 2d 443, 450 (Ala. 1992) (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 433b, comment a). \[5\] Defendant…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · February 11, 2015 · in the opinion

    McCROSSIN v. Imo Industries, Inc. (2015)

    …alleges that the two contractors who performed work on the Trenton were nonparties Owens Corning Fiberglass ("Owens") and Unicor. Id., at 6. Lone Star further alleges that neither Owens nor Unicor supplied any products to Pioneer…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 11, 2008 · in the opinion

    Norris v. Crane Company (2008)

    …and reasonably foreseeable manner; or (2) whether the benefits of the challenged design outweigh the risk of danger inherent in the design. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995; Barker v…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · March 9, 2023 · in the opinion

    Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)

    …with maritime law, is that the plaintiff show "more than a casual or minimum contact with the product" to hold the defendant liable. Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prod., 69 F.3d 712, 716 …

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    Vanhooser v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2012)

    …difficult to determine when the injury occurs and "\[n\]o temporally discrete event exists that encompasses the defendant's breach and the plaintiff's injury." (Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1977) 16 Cal.4th 520…

  10. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Puller (2006)

    …is made." Thus, we are not \[privileged\] to dissect the evidence and weigh the credibility of its messengers, which is what Crane has asked us to do. See Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · August 18, 2014 · in the opinion

    Grande v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, Inc. (2014)

    …Lineweaver's circumstantial evidence "sufficient to support a reasonable inference of exposure"), the circumstantial evidence must be "of sufficient weight to support a reasonable inference of causation." Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 28 Cal. App…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 9, 2009 · in the opinion

    Oxford v. Foster Wheeler LLC (2009)

    …dangerous to place the product in the hands of a user without a suitable warning or if no warning is given. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1000 \[281 Cal.Rptr…

  13. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · July 15, 2013 · in the opinion

    Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)

    …at 548, 217 A.2d at 675; see also Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 510 N.W.2d 854, 863 (Iowa 1994) (quoting In re Joint Eastern and Southern District Asbestos Litigation, 129 B.R…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 1, 2022 · in the opinion

    Labarre v. Bienville Auto Parts Inc. (2022)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · August 29, 2014 · in the opinion

    Hammell v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)

    …S. 121, 124-26, 129-35 (1989); Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d Cir. 1998). The Court analyzes the requirements and determines that the Contractor Defendants satisfy each. A. Corporate…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Merrill v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2009)

    …types of product defects: (1) manufacturing defects; (2) design defects, and (3) warning defects. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, [\1359] 995 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549\].) The…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · June 27, 2022 · in the opinion

    Bantin v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    …Accordingly, a plaintiff "must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product containing asbestos in order to hold \[the defendant\] liable." Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 13, 2023 · in the opinion

    King v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2023)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · December 29, 2016 · in the opinion

    In re Asbestos Litigation Charlevoix v. CBS Corporation (2016)

    …products, "in the scope of \[the plaintiffs\] entire work history," should be considered in determining whether defendant's conduct was a substantial contributing factor. Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 571N.W.2d530, 533 (Mich. Ct…

  20. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · December 11, 2008 · in the opinion

    Braaten v. Saberhagen Holdings (2008)

    …product which because of a defect or unsafe use is itself unsafe); Fricke v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 618 So.2d 473 (La.Ct.App. 1993) (manufacturer is not liable for inadequate warnings regarding a product…