No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

49 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 3 of 3

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 9, 2009 · in the opinion

    Oxford v. Foster Wheeler LLC (2009)

    …dangerous to place the product in the hands of a user without a suitable warning or if no warning is given. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1000 \[281 Cal.Rptr…

  2. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · September 8, 1993 · in the opinion

    Keene Corp. v. Rogers (1993)

    …can cause serious damage when injected, but which is the only known way to cure the deadly disease. \[6\] An attorney representing Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation actually made the objection, but the parties agreed at trial…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · October 26, 2020 · in the opinion

    Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2020)

    …179, 644 S.E.2d 724 (2007) (adopting the Lohrmann test for actionable exposure in South Carolina); Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th Cir. 1995) (applying the Lohrmann test in…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 17, 2015 · in the opinion

    Smyth v. Crane Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)

    …Grace & Co.-Conn), 216 AD2d 79 \[1st Dept. 1995\]). In addition, issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where "\[t\]he deposition testimony of a…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. Caterpillar (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …products, "in the scope of \[the plaintiff's\] entire work history," should be considered in determining whether defendant's conduct was a substantial contributing factor. Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 571N.W.2d530, 533 (Mich…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · April 12, 2017 · in the opinion

    Carroll v. Abb, Inc. (2017)

    …metal defense provides that "a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." Spychalla v…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 8, 2012 · in the opinion

    Adler v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2012)

    …Specifically, he alleges exposure to asbestos-containing boilers, furnaces, pumps, valves, steam traps, baker ovens, gaskets, and other items. Mr. Wexler was diagnosed with lung cancer on May 12, 2011. He is currently sixty-eight years…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    Conner v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2012)

    …now holds that, under maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute.

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · December 29, 1998 · in the opinion

    Hamilton v. Garlock, Inc. (1998)

    …426 F.2d 205, 211 (2d Cir.1970). Here, Plaintiff concedes that Atlas has no offices or owns no real estate in New York, that it maintains no bank accounts in this state, and that it…