64 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 3 of 4
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · August 31, 2000 · in the opinion
Caruolo v. John Crane, Inc. (2000)
…JOHN CRANE, INC., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, A C and S, Inc., Combustion Engineering, Inc., Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Fibreboard Corporation, U.S. Mineral Products Co., Pittsburgh-Corning Corp., The Flintkote Company, Rockwool Manufacturing Company, Anchor…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · December 28, 2007 · in the opinion
Gregg v. VJ Auto Parts Company (2007)
…A-Best Products Co., 757 A.2d 367, 376 (Pa. Super. 2000), and Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 729 A.2d 614, 623 (Pa. Super. 1999)). Like the common pleas court, Judge Bowes observed that…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 14, 2019 · in the opinion
Walker v. Blackmer Pump Co. (2019)
…Owens testified that Decedent probably worked on every electrical system on the U.S.S. Plymouth Rock. Further, Mr. Owens stated that Decedent spent roughly fifty-percent of his two-years aboard the U.S.S…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 10, 2016 · in the opinion
Wines v. Abb, Inc. (2016)
…federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d Cir. 1998…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · August 31, 2007 · in the opinion
Asbestos Corporation Limited v. Akaiwa (2007)
…motions. The court certified its orders for interlocutory appeal, which we accepted. DISCUSSION AND DECISION Standard of Review Our standard of review for summary judgment appeals is well established. Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. Cobb, 754…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · February 10, 2005 · in the opinion
Wilson v. John Crane, Inc. (2005)
…to move. For example, this fluid makes it easier for the lungs to move during breathing." See American Cancer Society at http://www.cancer.org. As we noted in Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343…
-
Occupation
Asbestos Exposure in Electricians and Electrical Workers
…your decision. What can an electrician's case recover from? Usually several sources at once: the bankruptcy trusts of asbestos makers like Manville and Owens-Corning; lawsuits against still-solvent manufacturers like General Electric and the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · October 26, 2020 · in the opinion
Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2020)
…179, 644 S.E.2d 724 (2007) (adopting the Lohrmann test for actionable exposure in South Carolina); Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th Cir. 1995) (applying the Lohrmann test in…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)
…plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 18, 2016 · in the opinion
Untermann v. D. Zelinsky & Sons, Inc. (2016)
…Citation.\]" (McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. (2002) 98 Cal.App.4th 1098, 1103; see Rutherford v. Owens-Williams, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 976-977.) Direct evidence of exposure is not required; rather, the plaintiff…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · January 27, 2011 · in the opinion
Fisher v. Alliance Machine Co. (2011)
…employed there. Accordingly, we disagree that it qualifies as a written admission. {¶ 42} Fisher's estate also attached several invoices from Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, purporting to show that Clark distributed asbestos products, specifically, Kaylo pipe…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 14, 2006
Rettig v. Gen. Motors Corp. (2006)
…his employer knew of asbestos dangers. The Wellman rule, under which a premises owner owes no duty to an independent contractor's employees doing inherently dangerous work, applies only if the contractor or its employee knew…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 4, 2004
Wajer v. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (2004)
…asbestos insulation and products nearby. The circuit court granted summary judgment to BGE, reasoning that a landowner owes no duty to an independent contractor's employees. The Court of Special Appeals affirmed. It held that several…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · February 15, 2013
Anderson v. Proctor & Gamble Paper Products Co. (2013)
…and are not barred by the statute of repose. Under Wisconsin's safe place statute, a premises owner owes a heightened statutory duty to employees of independent contractors, separate from the common-law rule in Tatera…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 10, 2021
Smith v. AC Light. & Elec. Supplies, LLC (2021)
…200 and common-law negligence, a premises owner or contractor owes a duty to provide a safe workplace only if it had authority to supervise or control the activity causing the injury; evidence that it oversaw…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · June 20, 2018 · in the opinion
Bechtel Corporation v. Batchelor (2018)
…possession and control of all or part of the plant such that it owed Mr. Batchelor the same duty that a landowner owes an invitee under the law of premises liability. For the reasons explained below…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · September 28, 2016 · in the opinion
Myers v. Bremen Casting, Inc. (2016)
…a principal owes no duty of care to an employee of an independent contractor if (1) there is no allegation the principal negligently selected its independent contractors,\[4\] and (2) the facts establish the employee was…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · December 27, 2017 · in the opinion
Bechtel Corporation v. Batchelor (2017)
…possession and control of all or part of the plant such that it owed Mr. Batchelor the same duty that a landowner owes an invitee under the law of premises liability. For the reasons explained below…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 19, 2018 · in the opinion
Melancon v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2018)
…F.3d at 173). Remand is proper when defendants can show only that the government owns the relevant vessels and fails to produce evidence that the government distributed safety procedures regarding use of asbestos. See Bartel…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 8, 2012 · in the opinion
Adler v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2012)
…Specifically, he alleges exposure to asbestos-containing boilers, furnaces, pumps, valves, steam traps, baker ovens, gaskets, and other items. Mr. Wexler was diagnosed with lung cancer on May 12, 2011. He is currently sixty-eight years…