81 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 3 of 5
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 15, 2010 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2010)
…and administrative powers, as well as inherent power to control litigation before them. \[Citation.\]" (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 967)." When the plaintiff has engaged in misconduct during the course of…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Collin v. Calportland Company (2014)
…containing CalPortland product. A plaintiff claiming asbestos-related injuries must establish some exposure to the asbestos-containing product or activity for which the defendant is responsible. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 30, 2024 · in the opinion
Brooks v. Mission Stucco Company (2024)
…asbestos-related cancer cases, the plaintiff may seek to prove causation by establishing years of exposure to multiple manufacturers' asbestos-containing products. In Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, the California Supreme…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 4, 2021 · in the opinion
Swanson v. The Marley-Wylain Co. (2021)
…series of exposures was a \legal cause' of his injury, i.e., a substantial factor in bringing about the injury." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 982 \[67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 8, 2011 · in the opinion
Saffold v. Bondex International, Inc. (2011)
…before damages can be allotted to it." (Wilson v. Ritto (2003) 105 Cal.App.4th 361, 369; Sparks v Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 478 \[defendant manufacturer of asbestos-containing product "undisputedly…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 8, 2013 · in the opinion
Georgia Pacific v. Farrar (2013)
…Edgecombe, 384 Md. 606, 865 A.2d 603 (2005), and Adams v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 119 Md.App. 395, 705 A.2d 58 (1998), Georgia Pacific contends that: (1) the existence of a duty is determined…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 26, 2007 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Stephens (2007)
…by defendant, and coworker testified that he used defendant's pipe covering approximately ninety percent of time and installed it in areas where plaintiff regularly worked). But cf. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 682 A…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 13, 2007 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Stephens (2007)
…by defendant, and coworker testified that he used defendant's pipe covering approximately ninety percent of time and installed it in areas where plaintiff regularly worked). But cf. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · January 8, 2015
Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2015)
…ended before the marriage, but denied it to Georgia-Pacific. A defendant owes no duty to a spouse for loss of consortium if the couple was not married when the asbestos exposure occurred, and insurance-policy…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 3, 2008
Gregory v. Beazer East (2008)
…Georgia-Pacific, so the widow lost on both claims. An owner who hires an independent contractor owes a duty to the contractor's employee only if it retained control over how the work was done; general…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · July 7, 1993
Behrendt v. GAF Corp. (1993)
…against defendants GAF, National Gypsum, Owens Corning and U.S. Gypsum. A jury award that bears no reasonable relation to uncontradicted losses warrants a new trial, and it cannot be upheld as a compromise verdict where…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · January 21, 1994
Tabolt v. Flintkote Co. (In re New York Asbestos Litigation, 1994)
Four men with pleural mesothelioma, or their spouses, sued several asbestos companies in federal court in New York. They were Vincent Tabolt, John Consorti, Alfred Luchnick and Peter Pulizzi. Tabolt worked at a farm cooperative and was said to have…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 6, 2015 · in the opinion
Galasso v. BF Goodrich (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)
1995\]). In addition, issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where "\[t\]he deposition testimony of a litigant is sufficient to raise an issue of…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 10, 2018 · in the opinion
Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2018)
…is what the Court of Appeals has "termed a \bystander,' in that he did not work directly with the asbestos products but was in the vicinity of where such products were used." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2024 · in the opinion
Watts v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2024)
…no evidence of sufficient sustainability to support the claim or defense of the party opposing the motion...." (Howard v. Owens Corning (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 621, 629-630 \[85 Cal.Rptr.2d 386\].) "On appeal…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2018 · in the opinion
Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2018)
…is what the Court of Appeals has "termed a \bystander,' in that he did not work directly with the asbestos products but was in the vicinity of where such products were used." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · October 11, 2024 · in the opinion
Day v. 3M Company Inc. (2024)
…holds the qualifications this Court expects of an expert proffered to opine upon specific medical causation of mesothelioma. See Owens, 838 A.2d at 891 (holding a trial justice may consider an expert's qualifications when…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · February 26, 2020 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Font (2020)
…Babcock & Wilcox, and Owens-Corning. \[5\] Union Carbide also suggests that an instruction on the learned intermediary defense would be sufficient if it used the word "discharge" instead of "fulfill," since both words signify a complete…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2010 · in the opinion
Haver v. BNSF Railway Company (2010)
…to Lynne because it had no special relationship with her. Recognizing that foreseeability is a crucial factor in determining whether a defendant owes a duty of care, BNSF pointed out that the primary question to be…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 28, 2011 · in the opinion
Konstantin v. 630 Third Ave. Assocs. (2011)
…of exposure by the plaintiff herein constitutes a separately compensable injury. In support, plaintiffs rely on Consorti v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 86 NY2d 449 \[1995\], in which the Court of Appeals found that a widow…