No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

84 results for “Reaction Department”, page 3 of 5

  1. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · May 16, 1985 · in the opinion

    Sheppard v. AC & S. Co. (1985)

    …in lung or other tissue. The reaction consists of the body "walling off" the foreign matter with fibrous cells such that it eventually produces scar-like tissue which builds up over many years. Forty-Eight Insulations…

  2. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 15, 2009 · in the opinion

    Daley v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)

    …become imbedded in lung or other tissue. The reaction consists of the body "walling off" the foreign matter with fibrous cells such that it eventually produces scar-like tissue which builds up over many years. \ \ \ Pulmonary…

  3. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 20, 2016 · in the opinion

    Blow v. OneBEACON America Insurance Company (2016)

    …as to its retroactive or prospective application. What is certain, however, is that Act 117 embodies a legislative reaction to, and refutation of, the Supreme Court's Kellis opinion, which held that the Direct Action Statute…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · May 1, 1981 · in the opinion

    Fusco v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. (1981)

    …972 (5th Cir. 1975) (products liability case time-barred because plaintiff brought suit five years after she had been informed that her physical ailments probably resulted from an adverse reaction to the defendant's product). [\1184…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · November 12, 1990 · in the opinion

    Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1990)

    …Asbestos fibers, once inhaled, remain in place in the lung, causing a tissue reaction that is slowly progressive and irreversible. Typically, the disease does not manifest itself until years after initial exposure to asbestos fibers. The…

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · August 17, 1998 · in the opinion

    Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1998)

    …the judge. When the proceedings resumed, the district court reprimanded plaintiffs' counsel. Pittsburgh Corning mentions adverse audience reaction on a couple of occasions, but the district court properly handled those matters. Neither of these occurrences, or…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · April 8, 1981 · in the opinion

    Porter v. American Optical Corp. (1981)

    …Rather, the disease is a culmination of body reaction to the particles inhaled during years of exposure. The disease is slow in nature and may require from ten to twenty years from onset to fully manifest…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 21, 1985 · in the opinion

    Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1985)

    …and evokes the strongest of emotions. This prejudice must be coupled with the lack of effectiveness of any limiting instruction to eliminate the emotional reaction from the minds of the jury. Looking just at the first…

  9. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 14, 1990 · in the opinion

    Owens Corning Fiberglas v. Ind. Comm'n (1990)

    …respiratory movements, the asbestos fibers work into the tissues outside the bronchia and into the peribronchial tissues where the fibers seem to set up an inflammatory or fibrotic reaction which results in scar tissue formation. According…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 29, 1989 · in the opinion

    Fusaro v. Porter-Hayden Co. (1989)

    …initial exposure, is characterized by diffuse, interstitial fibrotic pulmonary reaction. The effects of asbestosis are generally cumulative in that the continued exposure to asbestos dust increases both the risk and severity of the disease. The lungs…

  11. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · September 29, 1981 · in the opinion

    Bunker v. National Gypsum Co. (1981)

    …it is progressive and apparently irreversible. As Dr. Selikoff characterizes the medical reaction. "Thus a workman who has been continually exposed to asbestos for, let us say, twenty-five years carries within him a composite biological…

  12. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · February 15, 2018 · in the opinion

    Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Oakes EX rel. Hagan (2018)

    …the Supreme Court noted that a setoff had occurred in Ayers, and there was no negative reaction or treatment of the setoff in the opinion. According to Ayers: "After reduction for three claimants' comparative negligence from…

  13. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 3, 1982 · in the opinion

    Staiano v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1982)

    …24 Wayne L.Rev. 1641 (1978) (British reaction to first breath rule announced in Cartledge). Other jurisdictions have viewed subjecting the plaintiff to exposure as a continuing tort and have adopted what may be called the…

  14. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 7, 1998 · in the opinion

    ACandS v. Abate (1998)

    …they may pierce through the smallest airways into the pleura. The fibers that reach the pleura cause a localized reaction which results in a deposit of scar tissue. When the scarring of the pleura is localized…

  15. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · October 30, 2002 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois v. Gianotti (2002)

    …matters not usually reflected in a cold record. The judge is able to ascertain the demeanor of the witnesses and to note the reaction of the jurors and counsel to inadmissible matters. That is to say…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · September 10, 1973 · in the opinion

    Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation (1973)

    …fibers, once inhaled, remain in place in the lung, causing a tissue reaction that is slowly progressive and apparently irreversible. Even if no additional asbestos fibers are inhaled, tissue changes may continue undetected for decades. By…

  17. Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · March 10, 2003 · in the opinion

    Norfolk & Western R. Co. v. Ayers (2003)

    …See id., at 433. The distress the employee alleged, including his emotional reaction to an incremental, increased risk of dying from cancer, was beyond the ability of a jury to evaluate with precision, heightening the danger…

  18. Court case · Florida Supreme Court · July 8, 2011 · in the opinion

    American Optical Corporation v. Spiewak (2011)

    …Appeal held that the man could maintain an action against the manufacturer even though he suffered no lingering physical injury or particular continuing impairment, but only a mental reaction, to the foreign object in the bottle…

  19. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 21, 2002 · in the opinion

    Ballard v. Armstrong World Indus. (Matter of Seventh Jud. Dist. Asbestos Litig., 2002)

    …substantially the same questions of fact, as happens when large numbers of plaintiffs allege that they have developed similar illnesses in reaction to a particular toxic substance \ \ \ In such circumstances, consolidation permits the federal court to…

  20. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 11, 1994 · in the opinion

    DiDio v. Philadelphia Asbestos Corp. (1994)

    …565a-566a, 571a-575a. James Didio testified that he suffers great anxiety as a result of his diagnosis and described his initial reaction to the diagnosis of his conditions as devastation. N.T. 9/20/91…