No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

98 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”, page 3 of 5

  1. Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · October 20, 2023 · in the opinion

    Pete v. Boland Marine and Manufacturing Company, LLC (2023)

    …$5,000,000. In my view, the highest award reasonably within the jury's discretion in this matter is $4,000,000. See Lege v. Union Carbide Corp., 20-0252 (La. App. 4 Cir. 4/1…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 16, 2006 · in the opinion

    8th Jud Dist Asbestos Litig (2006)

    …Similarly, there is no private right of action under the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) (42 USC § 9601) (see Ruffing v Union Carbide Corp., 1 AD3d 339, 341 \[2003\], appeal…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2017 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2017)

    …evidence of exposure in asbestos personal injury cases. Particularly instructive is Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 962 \[180 Cal.Rptr.3d 382\] (Izell). The plaintiff ran a construction company from 1964…

  4. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 20, 2019 · in the opinion

    Hoffman v. Ketchikan Pulp Co. (2019)

    …INC.; PACIFIC PLUMBING SUPPLY LLC; SABERHAGEN HOLDINGS, INC.; UNION CARBIDE CORP; Defendants. No. 51162-2-II. Filed August 20, 2019. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two. Appeal from Pierce County Superior Court Docket No: 14…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2024 · in the opinion

    Williams v. JM Manufacturing Company, Inc. (2024)

    …was exposed to asbestos from asbestos-cement pipe supplied by J-MM. Relying on Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 962 (Izell), J-MM contends that Cornelius only raised a "mere possibility…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 15, 2015 · in the opinion

    Soto v. BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. (2015)

    …the record contains evidence sufficient to support the judgment. It is the appellant's affirmative burden to demonstrate otherwise." (Stewart v. Union Carbide Corp. (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 23, 33 \[117 Cal.Rptr.3d 791…

  7. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · October 27, 2005 · in the opinion

    Holdampf v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Matter of Nyc Asbestos Litig, 2005)

    …by its employee's family member, allegedly as a result of exposure to toxins brought home from the workplace on the employee's work clothes (see also Ruffing v Union Carbide Corp., 1 AD3d 339 \[2d…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 4, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)

    …it.\[1\] The motion is opposed by defendants General Electric Co., Foster Wheeler LLC, and ViacomCBS, Inc.;\[2\] Union Carbide Corp. and BayerCropScience, Inc.;\[3\] and plaintiff Callen Cortez (collectively, the "opposing parties").\[4\] For the…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 30, 2019 · in the opinion

    Lopez v. the Hillshire Brands Company (2019)

    …sources of plaintiff's injury." (Id. at pp. 1416-1417.) We review a jury's causation finding for substantial evidence. (Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 962, 969; Jones v. John Crane…

  10. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · January 5, 2023 · in the opinion

    Pete v. Boland Marine and Manufacturing Company, LLC (2023)

    …instant case would suggest that a general damage award should be somewhere in the neighborhood of half of what was awarded to Mr. Pete. See Lege v. Union Carbide Corp., 20-0252 (La. App. 4 Cir…

  11. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · February 27, 2024 · in the opinion

    Burford v. Howmet Aerospace, Inc. (2024)

    …asbestos in the ambient air to which everyone is exposed. \[6\] Alcoa relies on the plurality opinion in Neely v. Union Carbide Corp. and cites a statement from the opinion as a statement by this court…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 7, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)

    …that he knew that his father was working with asbestos-containing products, because plaintiff himself worked as an insulator, and recognized the fibers.\[19\] See Francis v. Union Carbide Corp., 116 So. 3d 858, 863 (La…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Idaho · October 1, 2018

    Stephens v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (2018)

    The court denied Union Pacific's motion for judgment on the pleadings because it had waived its preemption defense, but granted Union Pacific summary judgment because the Stephenses lacked evidence of exposure and causation, and denied…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · August 28, 2019

    Stephens v. Union Pacific R. Co. (2019)

    The Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for Union Pacific Railroad and against William and Norma Stephens, because Stephens did not show that exposure attributable to Union Pacific was a substantial factor in causing his mesothelioma. Under…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 17, 2018 · in the opinion

    Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2018)

    …studies linking secondary asbestos exposure with the onset of asbestos disease. (See Castleman Dep. at 19:19-21.) Additionally, Union Pacific urges the court to follow Hoyt v. Lockheed Shipbuilding Co., C12-1648TSZ, 2013 WL 3270371…

  16. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 14, 1997

    Van Winkle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997)

    …for prior acts of coconspirators only if it knew of and approved those acts when it joined. Wrongful Death and Survival; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Unarco (Union Asbestos & Rubber Company) Bloomington plant; Unarco asbestos plant…

  17. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 22, 2011

    In re Estate OF Holmes v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2011)

    …1962-1963), so the civil conspiracy claim based on a duty to disclose could not stand. Take-Home Exposure; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Unarco (Union Asbestos & Rubber Company) Bloomington plant; Unarco manufacturing plant, Bloomington (husband…

  18. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 11, 1998

    McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    …evidence, proximate cause need only be shown by a preponderance. Causation; Expert Testimony; Fault, Apportionment and Settlement Credits; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Unarco (Union Asbestos & Rubber Company) Bloomington plant; Unarco plant, Bloomington, Bloomington; Unarco plant…

  19. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 21, 1999

    McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    …and convincing proof of the agreement element. The remaining contacts among the companies were as consistent with innocence as with guilt. Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Unarco (Union Asbestos & Rubber Company) Bloomington plant; Unarco Bloomington plant…

  20. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 22, 2019

    Berry v. Anco Insulations (2019)

    …the settled defendants' fault was not proved. It found no abuse of discretion in excluding some evidence about union knowledge or in refusing a credit for the midtrial settlement. It upheld the $1 million future medical…