736 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 30 of 37
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 2016 · in the opinion
Watkins v. Affinia Group (2016)
…702. Thus, the trial court should not accept the expert's opinion at face value; it must independently [\179] examine and evaluate the reliability of each expert's opinion. Walker v. Ford Motor Co., 8th Dist.
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · August 18, 1988 · in the opinion
Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1988)
…Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co., 418 Mich. 311, 343 N.W.2d 164 (1984), and Cousineau v. Ford Motor Co., 140 Mich.App. 19, 363 N.W.2d 721 (1985), cert. denied sub nom. Firestone Tire…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · September 3, 2024 · in the opinion
Edmonds v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)
…to establish that any specific dosages of asbestos causes injury, every exposure to asbestos should be considered a cause of injury." Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F.Supp.3d 841, 846 (E.D.N.C…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · September 28, 2018 · in the opinion
Goodrich v. John Crane, Inc. (2018)
…702. Courts have condensed these requirements into two primary inquiries: "1) whether the proposed expert's testimony is relevant; and 2) whether it is reliable." Yates v. Ford Motor Co., No. 5:12-CV-752-FL…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · February 12, 2025 · in the opinion
Alford v. Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc. (2025)
…Ct.1974); Spruill v. Boyle-Midway, Inc., 308 F.2d 79, 87 (4th Cir.1962); Wolfe v. Ford Motor Co., 6 Mass.App. 346, 376 N.E.2d 143, 147 (1978); Seley v. G.D. Searle…
-
Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · December 10, 2015 · in the opinion
Segroves v. Union Carbide (2015)
…Woods, 777 S.W.2d 347, 349 (Tenn. 1989)). It is a "rule of rest," Moulton v. Ford Motor Co., 533 S.W.2d 295, 296 (Tenn. 1976), and it promotes finality in litigation, prevents inconsistent…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · March 17, 1986 · in the opinion
In re Moorenovich (1986)
…not recover damages for negligently inflicted mental suffering, except in connection with recovery of damages for physical injury caused by the same negligent act." Vicnire v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 401 A.2d 148, 153 (1979)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of the Virgin Islands · September 27, 1991 · in the opinion
Dunn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass (1991)
…See also Tunis Bros. Co. v. Ford Motor Co., 124 F.R.D. 95, 97-98 (E.D.Pa.1989) (failure to list witness justified excluding witness). EVIDENTIARY QUESTIONS Defendant argues that this court erred in…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · October 11, 2018 · in the opinion
Quisenberry v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2018)
…factor' in the duty assessment under Pennsylvania law." (citation omitted)); Cf. Miller v. Ford Motor Co., 740 N.W.2d 206, 209-10 (Mich. 2007) (holding the owner of "property on which asbestos-containing products were…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · July 27, 2016 · in the opinion
Font v. Union Carbide Corp. (2016)
…complained of resulted in a miscarriage of justice, or unless the \failure to give the instruction was reasonably calculated to confuse or mislead the jury.'" Force v. Ford Motor Co., 879 So.2d 103, 106 (Fla…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 28, 2012 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corp. v. Synatzske (2012)
…because they are reasonable and supported by the evidence. See Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co., 84 S.W.3d 198, 211 (Tex.2002) (trial court does not abuse its discretion if some evidence of substantive and…
-
Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · October 29, 2019 · in the opinion
Davis v. John Crane, Inc. (2019)
…designing it so that it is reasonably safe for the purposes for which it is intended, and for other uses which are foreseeably probable\[.\] (Citations and punctuation omitted; emphasis in original.) Ford Motor Co. v. Stubblefield…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 4, 1991 · in the opinion
Koker v. Armstrong Cork, Inc. (1991)
…483, 744 P.2d 357 (1987), review denied, 110 Wn.2d 1007 (1988). See also Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wn.2d 208, 209, 683 P.2d 1097, 40 A.L.R.4th 609, (1984…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 12, 2021 · in the opinion
Faivor v. Amchem Prods., Inc. (2021)
…12, 2021. Supreme Court, Suffolk County. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, 700 Broadway, New York, New York 10003, Attorney for Plaintiffs. LANDMAN CORSI BALLAINE & FORD P.C., 1617 JFK Boulevard, Suite 955, Philadelphia, PA 19103, Attorney for Defendant DAP…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 5, 2018 · in the opinion
Marteney v. Elementis Chemicals Inc. (2018)
…Furthermore, we would reject it were we to consider it, as ratification through the acceptance of benefits requires knowledge of the relevant circumstances (Johnson v. California Interurban Motor Transp. Assn. (1938) 24 Cal.App.2d 322…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 4, 2019 · in the opinion
Linsowe v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2019)
General Motors (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 1179, 1183.) We begin our independent review of the special verdict with the award of $532,685.37 in economic and noneconomic damages to Sharron Linsowe. The damages award…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 29, 2016 · in the opinion
Rhodes v. McIC, Inc. (2016)
…Joshua Franklin Kahn, Michael Alan Brown, Michael L. Haslup, Matthew Thomas Wagman, Alicia N. Ritchie, Jonathan James Huber, F. Ford Loker, Jr., Miles and Stockbridge PC, Patrick C. Smith, R. Thomas Radcliffe, Jr., Steven J. Parrott…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit · March 27, 1989 · in the opinion
Dube v. Pittsburgh Corning (1989)
…768 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir.1985) (same); Ford v. American Motors Corp., 770 F.2d 465 (5th Cir.1985) (decision of postal service not to warn buyers of surplus vehicles of risk of rollovers was…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · June 25, 2019
Ford v. AO Smith Water Products (2019)
Noreen Ford, executor of the estate of Frank Gondar Jr., sued Burnham LLC and others after Gondar died of mesothelioma. The opinion says he was exposed to asbestos over 20 years from dust created when asbestos…
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · April 3, 2008
State EX rel. Pilkington North America, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (2008)
…Supreme Court reversed the court of appeals' mandamus grant and held that the Industrial Commission did not abuse its discretion in naming Pilkington, successor to Libbey Owens Ford's self-insured claims, as the amenable employer…