No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

767 results for “General Electric”, page 30 of 39

  1. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 22, 1989 · in the opinion

    Sholtis v. American Cyanamid Co. (1989)

    …theory of non-identification liability is acceptable in New Jersey. \[9\] The court "reserve\[d\] decision on the general appropriateness of including products with different degrees of risk in a market-share analysis." 116 N.J…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 23, 2019 · in the opinion

    Chevron Oronite Company v. Jacobs Field Services North America, Inc. (2019)

    …amount was excessive in light of the facts known or reasonably available to the insured at the time of settlement. The burden should, in general, be on the insurer, since its breach of contract \[i.e.…

  3. Court case · Arkansas Court of Appeals · April 3, 1985 · in the opinion

    Alcoa v. Vann (1985)

    … 81-1314(5)(iii) (Repl. 1976) provides: No compensation shall be payable for any ordinary disease of life to which the general public is exposed. These statutes require that a causal connection between the claimant's…

  4. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 5, 1999 · in the opinion

    Pittsburgh Corning Corp. v. Walters (1999)

    …be raised at any point in the proceeding. A preliminary motion is, therefore, necessary to assure the application of the laws of another jurisdiction. General Chem. Corp. v. De La Lastra, 852 S.W.2d 916…

  5. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 11, 2007 · in the opinion

    Alcoa, Inc. v. Behringer (2007)

    …Nevertheless, appellees argue that this memorandum evidences Alcoa's general knowledge that "contaminants could be taken home." Knowledge of the general danger of contact-poisoning from "chemical products," however, does not amount to knowledge of the…

  6. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 25, 2023 · in the opinion

    Lewis v. Washington State Department OF Labor and Industries (2023)

    …1516, Counsel for Appellant(s). Robert W. Ferguson, Office of the Attorney General, 1125 Washington St Se, Po Box 40100, Olympia, WA, 98504-0100, Steve Vinyard, Attorney General's Office, Po Box 40121, Olympia, WA, 98504…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Georgia · March 28, 2018 · in the opinion

    Farmer v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation (2018)

    …296-1 ¶ 19.) Testimony from another case regarding Honeywell's general practices without any evidence that such practices were followed in this case is not sufficient to create a genuine issue as to a material fact. \…

  8. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 5, 2000 · in the opinion

    Brunet v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2000)

    …should be held strictly liable for the injuries that Brunet sustained. The trial court did not err in awarding Brunet $250,000 in general damages. I do not believe that the award is beyond that which…

  9. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · January 17, 2001 · in the opinion

    Crooks v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)

    …principle of stare decisis, the civil law statutes and codes are usually drafted in more general terms than common-law statutes and thus depend more on judges to render them concrete through judicial interpretation. Id. The…

  10. Court case · California Supreme Court · February 18, 2010 · in the opinion

    McCann v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2010)

    …law. Although section 361 provides that, in general, a cause of action arising in another state cannot be maintained in California if the other state's law bars the action due to a lapse of time…

  11. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · October 18, 1995 · in the opinion

    ACandS, Inc. v. Godwin (1995)

    …we have now evidence of the consequences of exposure, but we do not have, in general, accurate measures of the levels of exposure occurring 20 or 30 years ago, which have given rise to these consequences…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 18, 2016 · in the opinion

    DePriest v. Crane Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2016)

    …Here, the evidence that plaintiffs' medical experts intend to submit has the potential to sufficiently establish a general connection between asbestos and mesothelioma, as well as a scientific expression of plaintiffs' exposure levels based on Stagnito…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Iowa · November 22, 1994 · in the opinion

    Perrin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)

    …that the defendants' products were located at shipyards where the Parks was overhauled, and were used by shipyard workers on ships in general, does not support a reasonable inference that the plaintiff was exposed to asbestos…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · November 26, 2013 · in the opinion

    Cabasug v. Crane Company (2013)

    …limited; pipefitter journeyman; nuclear inspector, Code 139; General Engineer, Code 365; and Test Engineer and Risk Control. Plaintiffs asserts that he was exposed to asbestos up until 1986 when he was promoted to an office job…

  15. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 28, 1997 · in the opinion

    Mavroudis v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. (1997)

    …evidence or the supposed inadequacies therein, with the single exception of one general objection based on hearsay contained in the declarations of counsel [\693] provided for use at the reasonableness hearing. Even that objection is not…

  16. Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · June 7, 2011 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Covil Corporation (2011)

    …erred by failing to apply the average weekly wages in conjunction with section 97-38. "\\[I\]n discerning the intent of the General Assembly, statutes in pari materia should be construed together and harmonized whenever possible.'…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 1, 2019 · in the opinion

    Finch v. Covil Corporation (2019)

    …130:23 -131:1. The fact that this evidence also made Covil "look bad" in some general sense does not make it inadmissible character evidence or unfairly prejudicial under Rule 403. It was highly relevant and…

  18. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · October 14, 2009 · in the opinion

    Nye v. Bayer Cropscience, Inc. (2009)

    …S.W.3d 143 (Tenn. 2007), revisited Ridings, Snyder and Carroll. In Troup, Belz was a general contractor overseeing the construction of a warehouse. Troup, the plaintiff, was employed by Belz's subcontractor, Jolly. Another subcontractor…

  19. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 10, 1988 · in the opinion

    Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. US (1988)

    …the LHWCA; and (2) under the LHWCA, Eagle-Picher need not satisfy the general admiralty jurisdiction requirement that the underlying wrong had a significant relationship (i.e., a nexus) to a traditional maritime activity. Executive Jet…

  20. Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · June 1, 2018 · in the opinion

    Kinseth v. Weil-McLain (2018)

    …Waterloo, for appellees. [\62] Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Richard E. Mull, Assistant Attorney General, for intervenor-appellee. [\61] CADY, Chief Justice. In this case, we are called upon to review numerous issues that arose…