No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

767 results for “General Electric”, page 33 of 39

  1. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 17, 1989 · in the opinion

    Falk v. Keene Corporation (1989)

    …effects of human exposure to asbestos. Initially, defendant Raymark reserved "the right to direct and ... to use the general information \[from Dr. Demopoulos's testimony\] in closing argument." Once, however, it was apparent that appellants sought…

  2. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · June 27, 2007 · in the opinion

    Reynolds v. Garlock Sealing Technologies (Mtr OF Eighth Jud. Dist. Asbestos Litigation, 2007)

    …441, 444 \[Utah 1989\]; Ratterree v Bartlett, 238 Kan 11, 29, 707 P2d 1063, 1076 \[1985\]; General Motors Corp. v Lahocki, 286 Md 714, 723-733, 410 A2d 1039, 1044-1048 \[1980\]; Ward v Ochoa, 284…

  3. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · July 1, 2015 · in the opinion

    Payne v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2015)

    …a diesel locomotive, inside the cab or just in the general area." He acknowledged that "diesel fumes would go \[\] into the air in the general direction back toward the caboose, the cab of the engine and…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 15, 2021 · in the opinion

    Klick v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2021)

    …Instead, Defendant reiterates its arguments regarding general jurisdiction and misconstrues Plaintiffs' arguments regarding Abex's New Jersey facility, stating that "Plaintiffs' position that Abex's research and development department in New Jersey constitutes its principal place…

  5. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 3, 2023 · in the opinion

    Wright v. 3M Co. (2023)

    …jury on "known and obvious" dangers pursuant to § 343A of Restatement (Second) of Torts in light of the evidence presented at trial. ANALYSIS A. General principles regarding premises liability, jury instructions, and the standard of review …

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 29, 1990 · in the opinion

    Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos (1990)

    … 388 (1965), observing that the section had previously been adopted as a general principle in the duty to warn area by previous Maryland cases. Section 388 states as follows: Chattel Known to Be Dangerous for Intended…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 15, 1985 · in the opinion

    Dartez v. Fibreboard Corp. (1985)

    …any other evidence which the proponent can procure through reasonable efforts; and (C) the general purposes of these rules and the interests of justice will best be served by admission of the statement into evidence. However…

  8. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · March 3, 1997 · in the opinion

    Kurak v. AP Green Refractories Co. (1997)

    …949 F.2d 167 (5th Cir.1991), seventeen plaintiffs contended they contracted asbestos related diseases while working in their factory at General Tire and Rubber Company. The suit named thirteen producers and users of asbestos containing…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · September 29, 2011 · in the opinion

    Kite v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2011)

    …her under color of such office. . . ." (Complaint at 13-14). It is this language on which the plaintiff relies for his disclaimer argument. As a general matter, "the plaintiff \[is\] the master of the claim. . . ." Caterpillar…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 10, 2023 · in the opinion

    Wilgenbusch v. Metalclad Insulation LLC (2023)

    …has held that comparative fault principles apply when apportioning liability between a strictly liable party and a negligent party. (See e.g., Daly v. General Motors Corp. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 725, 736-737; Safeway Stores…

  11. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 21, 1995 · in the opinion

    Jadlowski v. Owens Corning (1995)

    …decision to admit this evidence rested in the sound discretion of the trial court, and the judge's decision will not be disturbed unless manifestly unjust. Ratner v. General Motors Corp., 241 N.J. Super. 197…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 15, 2008 · in the opinion

    Whitlock v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2008)

    …Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 859 \["\[A\]s a general matter, orders granting a new trial are examined for abuse of discretion."\].) (Italics added.) Further, as "\[t\]he standard for review of an…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion

    Nolen v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2012)

    …or 1975. Again, Ay's general testimony that manufacturers, including Foster Wheeler, specified the use of asbestos insulation up until 1971 does not lead to a reasonable inference that asbestos was specified by Foster Wheeler at…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 7, 2014 · in the opinion

    Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)

    …477 U.S. at 257. The moving defendants principally challenge the plaintiffs' evidence of exposure and causation as a general matter without distinguishing between the causes of action. In a case where the plaintiff developed asbestosis…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Co. (2022)

    …judgment is disfavored when issues of intent or state of mind are involved, plaintiffs fail to consider that this is a general rule. The rule does not preclude this Court from evaluating the merits of such…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 1, 2009 · in the opinion

    Walmach v. Wheeler (2009)

    …probability that in the absence of the error, a result more favorable to the appealing party would have been reached." (Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 548, 574.) We Do Not Reach the…

  17. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Aquitato v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…

  18. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · April 16, 2018 · in the opinion

    Nichols v. Allis Chalmers Product Liability Trust (2018)

    …L. Rev. 457, 463 (2017). \[6\] For purposes of discussion, this Court notes that as a general rule, no legal duty exists in Rhode Island to control a third party's conduct. Santana v. Rainbow Cleaners…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 28, 2015 · in the opinion

    McALVEY v. Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC (2015)

    …limited to the frequency, regularity and proximity of Plaintiff's exposure to asbestos products in general and his conclusion that Plaintiff experienced a significant exposure to asbestos based on his work activities. Finally, Defendants argue that…

  20. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · February 26, 2021 · in the opinion

    Williams v. Seidenbach (2021)

    …2d 25, 40 (D.D.C. 2007) ("As a general rule, questions of federal law in MDL-transferred cases are governed by the law of the transferee circuit."); In re Korean Air Lines Disaster of Sept…