No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

736 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 35 of 37

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 17, 2007 · in the opinion

    Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corp. (2007)

    …Boveri Corporation, Burnham Boiler Corporation, Certainteed Corporation, Cleaverbrooks Co., Crane Co., Demming Division, Crane Packing, Crouse-Hinds, Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., Dana Corporation, Dresser Industries, Inc., Durabla Manufacturing Co., Eastern Gunnite Co., Inc., Georgia Pacific…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 13, 2019 · in the opinion

    Johansen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    …A. Costello, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP. IMO Industries, Inc., Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. The Fairbanks Company, Defendant, represented by Timothy A. Sullivan, III, Wilbraham, Lawler…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 13, 2016 · in the opinion

    Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)

    …Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. & Megan Trocki Mantzavinos, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C.. Ingersoll Rand Company, Defendant, represented by Jessica Lee Tyler…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion

    Evans v. John Crane (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …Corporation, Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. IMO Industries, Inc., Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2010 · in the opinion

    Collins v. Plant Insulation Company (2010)

    …is essentially an immunity from suit, or whether it is based on a predicate determination the conduct in question is not wrongful under the law. Subsequent cases illustrate this distinction. In Ford v. Polaris Industries, Inc…

  6. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · September 25, 2001 · in the opinion

    International Paper Co. v. Labour & Indus. Rev. Com'n (2001)

    …102.46. She filed the claim within three weeks of his death, and the claim is valid against International Paper Company.\[\[7\]\] (Footnote omitted.) [\360] \[11\] ¶ 16. We agree with LIRC's analysis that Kohler and…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 26, 2018 · in the opinion

    Pieno v. Crosby Valve (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …Cross Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. & Megan Trocki Mantzavinos, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. The Fairbanks Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Timothy…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 8, 2010 · in the opinion

    Peter & Elpis Constantinides v. CBS Corporation (2010)

    …into the design." Id. The court emphasized that Kohler produced a "generic" engine that had many potential uses and incorporations. Id. at 599; see also Ford v. International Harvester Co., 430 So. 2d 912 (Fl. Dist…

  9. Court case · Alabama Supreme Court · April 30, 1993 · in the opinion

    Hogland v. Celotex Corp. (1993)

    …Jr. of Crosby, Saad & Beebe, P.C., Birmingham, for appellee Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. Michael B. Kinnard and J. Ford Little of Baker, Worthington, Crossley, Stansberry & Woolf, Knoxville, TN, for appellees Keene Corp. and Owens-Illinois…

  10. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 3, 2019 · in the opinion

    Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2019)

    …is relevant. State v. Robertson, No. 40, slip op. at 8 (Md. Apr. 2, 2019); see also Ford v. State, 462 Md. 3, 46, 197 A.3d 1090, 1115 (2018), reconsideration denied (Dec. 11, 2018). In…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · April 9, 2015 · in the opinion

    Thomasson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2015)

    …NJ, for Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Christopher J. Keale, Esq., SEGWICK LLP, Newark, NJ, for Defendants Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. f/k/a Borg-Warner Corporation. Christopher S. Kozak, Esq., LANDMAN CORSI BALLAINE & FORD PC…

  12. Court case · Montana Supreme Court · December 14, 2004 · in the opinion

    Orr v. State (2004)

    …time the damage occurred. ¶55 Three courts from other jurisdictions have examined cases under the unusual circumstances presented here. We look to them for additional guidance. State v. Ford, 2001 MT 230, ¶ 22, 306 Mont. 517…

  13. Court case · U.S. Tax Court · April 28, 1997 · in the opinion

    Norwest Corp. v. Commissioner (1997)

    …of the asset on the purchase date. All remaining consideration, or residual consideration, must be allocated to class IV assets. See, e.g., East Ford, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-261. Petitioner did not…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 15, 2022 · in the opinion

    Stansbury v. McCARTY Corporation (2022)

    …AND REASONS IVAN L.R. LEMELLE, District Judge. Before the Court are defendants Bertram C. Hopeman and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, as alleged insurer of Hopeman's alleged executive officers Albert Arendt Hopeman, Jr., Bertram C…

  15. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · January 5, 2023 · in the opinion

    Pete v. Boland Marine and Manufacturing Company, LLC (2023)

    …07), 968 So. 2d 1063, 1074 (citing Theriot v. Allstate Ins. Co., 625 So.2d (La. 1993)). In Copell v. Arceneaux Ford, Inc., 2020-299, p. 12 (La. App. 3 Cir. 6/9/21), 322 So…

  16. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · December 14, 2004 · in the opinion

    Rourke v. Amchem Products, Inc. (2004)

    …and holdings in these §1738 cases are entirely consistent with the pronouncements of the Supreme Court in Constitutional full faith and credit cases. See, for example, Ford v. Ford, 371 U.S. 187, 192, 83 S…

  17. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 2, 2008 · in the opinion

    Sedlacek v. AO Smith Corp. (2008)

    …Hunter Sales, I.U. North America, Industrial Holdings Company, Ingersoll Rand, ITT Industries, Kentile Floors, Inc., M.S. Jacobs & Associates, Inc., McCarls, Inc., Melrath Supply & Gasket Co., Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Mobile Oil Corporation, Nagle Pumps…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 13, 2005 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2005)

    …the English solicitors for the Administrators of the English companies in the Federal-Mogul Group (the "UK Debtors") applied to Justice David Richards of the English High Court of Justice ("Justice Richards") for directions that concerned…

  19. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · October 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    Kardos v. Armstrong Pumps, Inc. (2019)

    …as to the causation of decedent's disease by the product of each particular defendant." Vanaman, supra at 607. See also Rost v. Ford Company, 637 Pa. 625, 151 A.3d 1032 (2016) (emphasizing that "frequent…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio · October 29, 2012 · in the opinion

    City of Dayton v. AR Environmental, Inc. (2012)

    …nature. See Mabry-Wright, 844 N.E.2d at 862; see also Logsdon v. Graham Ford Co., 376 N.E.2d 1333, 1335-36 (Ohio 1978). A. Tort Requirement With respect to the tort requirement, the…